法律經濟學之發展特別報導 — 從有效率的公平正義出發 Law and Economics Special Report — Proceeding Fair and Justice from Efficiency
自 1960 年代以來，法律之經濟分析（或法律經濟學）已經成為當代最重要的法學研究方法之一。然而，法學與經濟學本有各自之研究領域及研究方法，學者為何會嘗試以經濟學之分析方法，探究法學議題，並因此引起廣泛之討論，且至今未休？對法律人而言，實有必要從法律經濟學之歷史發展及經濟分析之基本理論著眼，藉以瞭解法律之經濟分析的梗概。其次，以「理性自利為假設前提」之分析模型，能否全然適用在法律學領域的論戰，亦能使我們對法律之經濟分析有更深刻的認識。最後，法學與經濟學之間究竟應該如何互動，則屬未來值得觀察的發展趨勢。站在法學追求「公平正 義」的理想上，以及經濟學倡言「效率」的大纛下，建構一個「有效率」之「公...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | zho |
| Published: |
National Chiao Tung University
2004-12-01
|
| Series: | Kējì Fǎxué Pínglùn |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www-old.itl.nctu.edu.tw/tlr_n/papers/ch_paper/1_2/1_2_1.pdf |
| _version_ | 1828737860097802240 |
|---|---|
| author | 林三元 San-Yuan Lin |
| author_facet | 林三元 San-Yuan Lin |
| author_sort | 林三元 San-Yuan Lin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | 自 1960 年代以來，法律之經濟分析（或法律經濟學）已經成為當代最重要的法學研究方法之一。然而，法學與經濟學本有各自之研究領域及研究方法，學者為何會嘗試以經濟學之分析方法，探究法學議題，並因此引起廣泛之討論，且至今未休？對法律人而言，實有必要從法律經濟學之歷史發展及經濟分析之基本理論著眼，藉以瞭解法律之經濟分析的梗概。其次，以「理性自利為假設前提」之分析模型，能否全然適用在法律學領域的論戰，亦能使我們對法律之經濟分析有更深刻的認識。最後，法學與經濟學之間究竟應該如何互動，則屬未來值得觀察的發展趨勢。站在法學追求「公平正
義」的理想上，以及經濟學倡言「效率」的大纛下，建構一個「有效率」之「公平正義」的社會，應該是法律經濟學努力的方向。
Economic analysis of law (or law and economics) has been deemed as one of the most important methodologies for legal study since 1960. However, law and economics are different subjects which focus on specific areas individually. It
would be an interesting and complicated issue to explore the relationship between law and economics. In order to keep the main points of law and economics, a lawyer should understand the history and basic theories of this subject. In this special report, I would like to bring the brief history of law and economics and
the most important assumptions of economics that are rationality, self-interest and the Coass theorem. In addition, I will introduce some critics, so called behavioral economics, which may back up law and economics, but are not satisfied with the “unreal” assumptions of economics. Those critics borrow some behavior theories from psychology and sociology to amend the model of human behavior been set up by economics. After unfold the broad outline of economic analysis of law and some critics, we may reconsider the future of law and economics by pursuing not only a new model for legal study but also an efficient justice system. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T23:51:28Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-621bc6f88c3d4d21a984828ac2c411e0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1811-3095 |
| language | zho |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T23:51:28Z |
| publishDate | 2004-12-01 |
| publisher | National Chiao Tung University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Kējì Fǎxué Pínglùn |
| spelling | doaj.art-621bc6f88c3d4d21a984828ac2c411e02022-12-22T03:11:40ZzhoNational Chiao Tung UniversityKējì Fǎxué Pínglùn1811-30952004-12-0112249293法律經濟學之發展特別報導 — 從有效率的公平正義出發 Law and Economics Special Report — Proceeding Fair and Justice from Efficiency林三元 San-Yuan Lin0台中地方法院法官，交通大學科技管理研究所科技法律組博士生自 1960 年代以來，法律之經濟分析（或法律經濟學）已經成為當代最重要的法學研究方法之一。然而，法學與經濟學本有各自之研究領域及研究方法，學者為何會嘗試以經濟學之分析方法，探究法學議題，並因此引起廣泛之討論，且至今未休？對法律人而言，實有必要從法律經濟學之歷史發展及經濟分析之基本理論著眼，藉以瞭解法律之經濟分析的梗概。其次，以「理性自利為假設前提」之分析模型，能否全然適用在法律學領域的論戰，亦能使我們對法律之經濟分析有更深刻的認識。最後，法學與經濟學之間究竟應該如何互動，則屬未來值得觀察的發展趨勢。站在法學追求「公平正 義」的理想上，以及經濟學倡言「效率」的大纛下，建構一個「有效率」之「公平正義」的社會，應該是法律經濟學努力的方向。 Economic analysis of law (or law and economics) has been deemed as one of the most important methodologies for legal study since 1960. However, law and economics are different subjects which focus on specific areas individually. It would be an interesting and complicated issue to explore the relationship between law and economics. In order to keep the main points of law and economics, a lawyer should understand the history and basic theories of this subject. In this special report, I would like to bring the brief history of law and economics and the most important assumptions of economics that are rationality, self-interest and the Coass theorem. In addition, I will introduce some critics, so called behavioral economics, which may back up law and economics, but are not satisfied with the “unreal” assumptions of economics. Those critics borrow some behavior theories from psychology and sociology to amend the model of human behavior been set up by economics. After unfold the broad outline of economic analysis of law and some critics, we may reconsider the future of law and economics by pursuing not only a new model for legal study but also an efficient justice system.http://www-old.itl.nctu.edu.tw/tlr_n/papers/ch_paper/1_2/1_2_1.pdf法律之經濟分析法律經濟學寇斯定理理性自利有限理性行為經濟學economic analysis of lawlaw and economicsCoase theoremself-interestrationalitybehavioral economics |
| spellingShingle | 林三元 San-Yuan Lin 法律經濟學之發展特別報導 — 從有效率的公平正義出發 Law and Economics Special Report — Proceeding Fair and Justice from Efficiency Kējì Fǎxué Pínglùn 法律之經濟分析 法律經濟學 寇斯定理 理性自利 有限理性 行為經濟學 economic analysis of law law and economics Coase theorem self-interest rationality behavioral economics |
| title | 法律經濟學之發展特別報導 — 從有效率的公平正義出發 Law and Economics Special Report — Proceeding Fair and Justice from Efficiency |
| title_full | 法律經濟學之發展特別報導 — 從有效率的公平正義出發 Law and Economics Special Report — Proceeding Fair and Justice from Efficiency |
| title_fullStr | 法律經濟學之發展特別報導 — 從有效率的公平正義出發 Law and Economics Special Report — Proceeding Fair and Justice from Efficiency |
| title_full_unstemmed | 法律經濟學之發展特別報導 — 從有效率的公平正義出發 Law and Economics Special Report — Proceeding Fair and Justice from Efficiency |
| title_short | 法律經濟學之發展特別報導 — 從有效率的公平正義出發 Law and Economics Special Report — Proceeding Fair and Justice from Efficiency |
| title_sort | 法律經濟學之發展特別報導 從有效率的公平正義出發 law and economics special report proceeding fair and justice from efficiency |
| topic | 法律之經濟分析 法律經濟學 寇斯定理 理性自利 有限理性 行為經濟學 economic analysis of law law and economics Coase theorem self-interest rationality behavioral economics |
| url | http://www-old.itl.nctu.edu.tw/tlr_n/papers/ch_paper/1_2/1_2_1.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT línsānyuánsanyuanlin fǎlǜjīngjìxuézhīfāzhǎntèbiébàodǎocóngyǒuxiàolǜdegōngpíngzhèngyìchūfālawandeconomicsspecialreportproceedingfairandjusticefromefficiency |