Structured spine fellowship programs in India: Current trends and perceptions

Introduction: The present study aimed to assess the quality of training provided during Structured Spine Fellowships (SSF) and explore the expectations of candidates. The study sought to investigate the utility of SSFs and emphasized the importance of evaluating the fellowship center’s curriculum as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saumyajit Basu, Aditya Banta, Kushal Gohil
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-01-01
Series:Indian Spine Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.isjonline.com/article.asp?issn=2589-5079;year=2024;volume=7;issue=1;spage=42;epage=49;aulast=Basu
_version_ 1797246389423439872
author Saumyajit Basu
Aditya Banta
Kushal Gohil
author_facet Saumyajit Basu
Aditya Banta
Kushal Gohil
author_sort Saumyajit Basu
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The present study aimed to assess the quality of training provided during Structured Spine Fellowships (SSF) and explore the expectations of candidates. The study sought to investigate the utility of SSFs and emphasized the importance of evaluating the fellowship center’s curriculum as well as trainees’ surgical and theoretical competency. Materials and Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted on 100 spine surgeons, 66 from Fellow of the National Board and 34 from the Association of Spine Surgeons of India, using a questionnaire. The survey had three parts, assessing pre-fellowship demographics, feedback on the fellowship conducted, and post-fellowship settlement. Results: The hands-on experience was the most important factor affecting the choice of center, and the average work time was 14 h per day. Nearly 50% of fellows were doing independent cervical dorsal and lumbar surgeries by the end of the fellowship. Academics were mainly in the form of regular case presentations for 55% of fellows, and the average number of publications done was 1.6. Most fellows settled near their native city, practiced exclusive spine surgery, and did a mean of 2.6 additional fellowships. Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive overview of the structured spine fellowship programs in India. The findings highlight the need for standardization and quality control measures in these programs to ensure that they provide a comprehensive and uniform education to the fellows. The study also underscores the importance of ongoing evaluation and assessment to improve the effectiveness of these programs in producing skilled and competent spine surgeons.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T19:42:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-623d31f1a45846478fd4f569235dc9bd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2589-5079
2589-5087
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T19:42:01Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Spine Journal
spelling doaj.art-623d31f1a45846478fd4f569235dc9bd2024-03-25T10:58:51ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Spine Journal2589-50792589-50872024-01-0171424910.4103/isj.isj_34_23Structured spine fellowship programs in India: Current trends and perceptionsSaumyajit BasuAditya BantaKushal GohilIntroduction: The present study aimed to assess the quality of training provided during Structured Spine Fellowships (SSF) and explore the expectations of candidates. The study sought to investigate the utility of SSFs and emphasized the importance of evaluating the fellowship center’s curriculum as well as trainees’ surgical and theoretical competency. Materials and Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted on 100 spine surgeons, 66 from Fellow of the National Board and 34 from the Association of Spine Surgeons of India, using a questionnaire. The survey had three parts, assessing pre-fellowship demographics, feedback on the fellowship conducted, and post-fellowship settlement. Results: The hands-on experience was the most important factor affecting the choice of center, and the average work time was 14 h per day. Nearly 50% of fellows were doing independent cervical dorsal and lumbar surgeries by the end of the fellowship. Academics were mainly in the form of regular case presentations for 55% of fellows, and the average number of publications done was 1.6. Most fellows settled near their native city, practiced exclusive spine surgery, and did a mean of 2.6 additional fellowships. Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive overview of the structured spine fellowship programs in India. The findings highlight the need for standardization and quality control measures in these programs to ensure that they provide a comprehensive and uniform education to the fellows. The study also underscores the importance of ongoing evaluation and assessment to improve the effectiveness of these programs in producing skilled and competent spine surgeons.http://www.isjonline.com/article.asp?issn=2589-5079;year=2024;volume=7;issue=1;spage=42;epage=49;aulast=Basuindiaspine fellowshipspine surgeonsspine surgery training qualitystructured spine fellowship programs
spellingShingle Saumyajit Basu
Aditya Banta
Kushal Gohil
Structured spine fellowship programs in India: Current trends and perceptions
Indian Spine Journal
india
spine fellowship
spine surgeons
spine surgery training quality
structured spine fellowship programs
title Structured spine fellowship programs in India: Current trends and perceptions
title_full Structured spine fellowship programs in India: Current trends and perceptions
title_fullStr Structured spine fellowship programs in India: Current trends and perceptions
title_full_unstemmed Structured spine fellowship programs in India: Current trends and perceptions
title_short Structured spine fellowship programs in India: Current trends and perceptions
title_sort structured spine fellowship programs in india current trends and perceptions
topic india
spine fellowship
spine surgeons
spine surgery training quality
structured spine fellowship programs
url http://www.isjonline.com/article.asp?issn=2589-5079;year=2024;volume=7;issue=1;spage=42;epage=49;aulast=Basu
work_keys_str_mv AT saumyajitbasu structuredspinefellowshipprogramsinindiacurrenttrendsandperceptions
AT adityabanta structuredspinefellowshipprogramsinindiacurrenttrendsandperceptions
AT kushalgohil structuredspinefellowshipprogramsinindiacurrenttrendsandperceptions