Migrants, Irregular Migrants, or (Irregular) Migrants?

Response to the ATR Debate Proposition: ‘It is important and necessary to make clear distinctions between (irregular) migrants, refugees and trafficked persons.’ Upon first reading this issue’s debate proposition, I was struck by its structure rather than its content. Its content is subject to li...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Katharine T. Weatherhead
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women 2018-10-01
Series:Anti-Trafficking Review
Online Access:https://antitraffickingreview.org/index.php/atrjournal/article/view/354
Description
Summary:Response to the ATR Debate Proposition: ‘It is important and necessary to make clear distinctions between (irregular) migrants, refugees and trafficked persons.’ Upon first reading this issue’s debate proposition, I was struck by its structure rather than its content. Its content is subject to lively discussions among scholars, practitioners, and policy-makers, as attested to by other contributions in this issue of the journal. Its curious structure, though, raises issues that merit articulation. In what follows, I briefly problematise the bracketing of the word ‘irregular’ in the debate proposition. What the brackets do is prompt an additional question: migrants, irregular migrants, or (irregular) migrants?
ISSN:2286-7511
2287-0113