Migrants, Irregular Migrants, or (Irregular) Migrants?
Response to the ATR Debate Proposition: ‘It is important and necessary to make clear distinctions between (irregular) migrants, refugees and trafficked persons.’ Upon first reading this issue’s debate proposition, I was struck by its structure rather than its content. Its content is subject to li...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women
2018-10-01
|
Series: | Anti-Trafficking Review |
Online Access: | https://antitraffickingreview.org/index.php/atrjournal/article/view/354 |
_version_ | 1797838239706382336 |
---|---|
author | Katharine T. Weatherhead |
author_facet | Katharine T. Weatherhead |
author_sort | Katharine T. Weatherhead |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Response to the ATR Debate Proposition: ‘It is important and necessary to make clear distinctions between (irregular) migrants, refugees and trafficked persons.’
Upon first reading this issue’s debate proposition, I was struck by its structure rather than its content. Its content is subject to lively discussions among scholars, practitioners, and policy-makers, as attested to by other contributions in this issue of the journal. Its curious structure, though, raises issues that merit articulation. In what follows, I briefly problematise the bracketing of the word ‘irregular’ in the debate proposition. What the brackets do is prompt an additional question: migrants, irregular migrants, or (irregular) migrants? |
first_indexed | 2024-04-09T15:38:43Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-62412f3b970e43e882d6bc4935fe885c |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2286-7511 2287-0113 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-09T15:38:43Z |
publishDate | 2018-10-01 |
publisher | Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women |
record_format | Article |
series | Anti-Trafficking Review |
spelling | doaj.art-62412f3b970e43e882d6bc4935fe885c2023-04-27T16:22:33ZengGlobal Alliance Against Traffic in WomenAnti-Trafficking Review2286-75112287-01132018-10-011110.14197/atr.201218118314Migrants, Irregular Migrants, or (Irregular) Migrants?Katharine T. WeatherheadResponse to the ATR Debate Proposition: ‘It is important and necessary to make clear distinctions between (irregular) migrants, refugees and trafficked persons.’ Upon first reading this issue’s debate proposition, I was struck by its structure rather than its content. Its content is subject to lively discussions among scholars, practitioners, and policy-makers, as attested to by other contributions in this issue of the journal. Its curious structure, though, raises issues that merit articulation. In what follows, I briefly problematise the bracketing of the word ‘irregular’ in the debate proposition. What the brackets do is prompt an additional question: migrants, irregular migrants, or (irregular) migrants?https://antitraffickingreview.org/index.php/atrjournal/article/view/354 |
spellingShingle | Katharine T. Weatherhead Migrants, Irregular Migrants, or (Irregular) Migrants? Anti-Trafficking Review |
title | Migrants, Irregular Migrants, or (Irregular) Migrants? |
title_full | Migrants, Irregular Migrants, or (Irregular) Migrants? |
title_fullStr | Migrants, Irregular Migrants, or (Irregular) Migrants? |
title_full_unstemmed | Migrants, Irregular Migrants, or (Irregular) Migrants? |
title_short | Migrants, Irregular Migrants, or (Irregular) Migrants? |
title_sort | migrants irregular migrants or irregular migrants |
url | https://antitraffickingreview.org/index.php/atrjournal/article/view/354 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katharinetweatherhead migrantsirregularmigrantsorirregularmigrants |