Can men be trusted in population-based surveys to report couples’ medical care for infertility?

Abstract Background Men are usually excluded from surveys on reproductive health as some works have cast doubts on their ability to accurately report information on reproduction. Recent papers challenged this viewpoint, arguing that the quality of men’s reports depends strongly on use of an appropri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Soraya Belgherbi, Elise de La Rochebrochard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-10-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-018-0566-y
_version_ 1818502986207330304
author Soraya Belgherbi
Elise de La Rochebrochard
author_facet Soraya Belgherbi
Elise de La Rochebrochard
author_sort Soraya Belgherbi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Men are usually excluded from surveys on reproductive health as some works have cast doubts on their ability to accurately report information on reproduction. Recent papers challenged this viewpoint, arguing that the quality of men’s reports depends strongly on use of an appropriate study design. We aimed to explore the relevance of evaluating couples’ use of medical care for infertility based on men’s interviews in a population-based survey. Methods The study was based on the last French sexual and reproductive health study (Fecond) conducted by phone interviews among a population-based sample of 2863 men and 4629 women aged 20–49 years. Results Among respondents who had ever tried to have a child, the use of infertility medical care by couples (i.e. by the respondents and/or their partners) within the previous 15 years was 16% (95%CI 14 to 18%) based on men’s reports and 17% (95%CI 15 to 18%) based on women’s reports (p = 0.43). Men’s and women’s reports were remarkably concordant on most items (infertility duration, treatment). The main discrepancy concerned male medical checkup, which was reported much more often by male respondents than female respondents (86% vs. 57%, p < 0.001 for sperm analysis, 56% vs. 27%, p < 0.001 for male genital examination). Conclusions It is time to trust men to report couples’ infertility medical care in reproductive surveys, as they provide information remarkably concordant with that provided by women. Conversely, women may poorly report the infertility checkups of their male partner.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T21:17:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6251942880ac482b9c01d3421ae87f3c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2288
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T21:17:41Z
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
spelling doaj.art-6251942880ac482b9c01d3421ae87f3c2022-12-22T01:33:14ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882018-10-011811910.1186/s12874-018-0566-yCan men be trusted in population-based surveys to report couples’ medical care for infertility?Soraya Belgherbi0Elise de La Rochebrochard1Université Paris-Saclay, Univ. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, INSERMUniversité Paris-Saclay, Univ. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, INSERMAbstract Background Men are usually excluded from surveys on reproductive health as some works have cast doubts on their ability to accurately report information on reproduction. Recent papers challenged this viewpoint, arguing that the quality of men’s reports depends strongly on use of an appropriate study design. We aimed to explore the relevance of evaluating couples’ use of medical care for infertility based on men’s interviews in a population-based survey. Methods The study was based on the last French sexual and reproductive health study (Fecond) conducted by phone interviews among a population-based sample of 2863 men and 4629 women aged 20–49 years. Results Among respondents who had ever tried to have a child, the use of infertility medical care by couples (i.e. by the respondents and/or their partners) within the previous 15 years was 16% (95%CI 14 to 18%) based on men’s reports and 17% (95%CI 15 to 18%) based on women’s reports (p = 0.43). Men’s and women’s reports were remarkably concordant on most items (infertility duration, treatment). The main discrepancy concerned male medical checkup, which was reported much more often by male respondents than female respondents (86% vs. 57%, p < 0.001 for sperm analysis, 56% vs. 27%, p < 0.001 for male genital examination). Conclusions It is time to trust men to report couples’ infertility medical care in reproductive surveys, as they provide information remarkably concordant with that provided by women. Conversely, women may poorly report the infertility checkups of their male partner.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-018-0566-ySurvey methodologyRespondentsFranceMaleFemaleInfertility
spellingShingle Soraya Belgherbi
Elise de La Rochebrochard
Can men be trusted in population-based surveys to report couples’ medical care for infertility?
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Survey methodology
Respondents
France
Male
Female
Infertility
title Can men be trusted in population-based surveys to report couples’ medical care for infertility?
title_full Can men be trusted in population-based surveys to report couples’ medical care for infertility?
title_fullStr Can men be trusted in population-based surveys to report couples’ medical care for infertility?
title_full_unstemmed Can men be trusted in population-based surveys to report couples’ medical care for infertility?
title_short Can men be trusted in population-based surveys to report couples’ medical care for infertility?
title_sort can men be trusted in population based surveys to report couples medical care for infertility
topic Survey methodology
Respondents
France
Male
Female
Infertility
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-018-0566-y
work_keys_str_mv AT sorayabelgherbi canmenbetrustedinpopulationbasedsurveystoreportcouplesmedicalcareforinfertility
AT elisedelarochebrochard canmenbetrustedinpopulationbasedsurveystoreportcouplesmedicalcareforinfertility