THEORY OF PRECEDENTS AND ITS INCOMPATIBILITY WITH THE DELIBERATIVE SYSTEM OF THE HIGHER COURTS

This article is the result of a discussion that has been taking account of judiciary, because how is it possible for each court to give a different judgment on identical matters? The answer is given to the fact that in Brazil is not intended to analyze the methods of the precedents, which are so wel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gilberto Andreassa Junior, Claudia Maria Barbosa
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria 2017-12-01
Series:Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/26773
_version_ 1818414805824831488
author Gilberto Andreassa Junior
Claudia Maria Barbosa
author_facet Gilberto Andreassa Junior
Claudia Maria Barbosa
author_sort Gilberto Andreassa Junior
collection DOAJ
description This article is the result of a discussion that has been taking account of judiciary, because how is it possible for each court to give a different judgment on identical matters? The answer is given to the fact that in Brazil is not intended to analyze the methods of the precedents, which are so well used in the common law system. What it proposes, in fact, is to demonstrate that the current legislative reforms are insufficient to generate a secure and coherent Judicial Power. It also seeks to demonstrate the impossibility of applying the theory of precedents in the current deliberative system of higher courts. The method used is based in bibliographic review, case studies and jurisprudence.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T11:24:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-625245c127a54152b286bc8960d6cedb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1981-3694
1981-3694
language Portuguese
last_indexed 2024-12-14T11:24:56Z
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
record_format Article
series Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
spelling doaj.art-625245c127a54152b286bc8960d6cedb2022-12-21T23:03:35ZporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaRevista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM1981-36941981-36942017-12-0112386188810.5902/198136942677314063THEORY OF PRECEDENTS AND ITS INCOMPATIBILITY WITH THE DELIBERATIVE SYSTEM OF THE HIGHER COURTSGilberto Andreassa Junior0Claudia Maria Barbosa1Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC/PR)Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC/PR)This article is the result of a discussion that has been taking account of judiciary, because how is it possible for each court to give a different judgment on identical matters? The answer is given to the fact that in Brazil is not intended to analyze the methods of the precedents, which are so well used in the common law system. What it proposes, in fact, is to demonstrate that the current legislative reforms are insufficient to generate a secure and coherent Judicial Power. It also seeks to demonstrate the impossibility of applying the theory of precedents in the current deliberative system of higher courts. The method used is based in bibliographic review, case studies and jurisprudence.https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/26773civil law, common law, jurisprudência, precedentes, sistemas
spellingShingle Gilberto Andreassa Junior
Claudia Maria Barbosa
THEORY OF PRECEDENTS AND ITS INCOMPATIBILITY WITH THE DELIBERATIVE SYSTEM OF THE HIGHER COURTS
Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
civil law, common law, jurisprudência, precedentes, sistemas
title THEORY OF PRECEDENTS AND ITS INCOMPATIBILITY WITH THE DELIBERATIVE SYSTEM OF THE HIGHER COURTS
title_full THEORY OF PRECEDENTS AND ITS INCOMPATIBILITY WITH THE DELIBERATIVE SYSTEM OF THE HIGHER COURTS
title_fullStr THEORY OF PRECEDENTS AND ITS INCOMPATIBILITY WITH THE DELIBERATIVE SYSTEM OF THE HIGHER COURTS
title_full_unstemmed THEORY OF PRECEDENTS AND ITS INCOMPATIBILITY WITH THE DELIBERATIVE SYSTEM OF THE HIGHER COURTS
title_short THEORY OF PRECEDENTS AND ITS INCOMPATIBILITY WITH THE DELIBERATIVE SYSTEM OF THE HIGHER COURTS
title_sort theory of precedents and its incompatibility with the deliberative system of the higher courts
topic civil law, common law, jurisprudência, precedentes, sistemas
url https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/26773
work_keys_str_mv AT gilbertoandreassajunior theoryofprecedentsanditsincompatibilitywiththedeliberativesystemofthehighercourts
AT claudiamariabarbosa theoryofprecedentsanditsincompatibilitywiththedeliberativesystemofthehighercourts