Infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first assessment may deserve a second semen analysis: Challenging the guidelines in the real-life scenario.

<h4>Objectives</h4>To investigate which infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first semen analysis deserve a second semen test.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Data from 1358 consecutive infertile men were analysed. Patients underwent two consecutive...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luca Boeri, Edoardo Pozzi, Paolo Capogrosso, Giuseppe Fallara, Federico Belladelli, Luigi Candela, Nicolò Schifano, Christian Corsini, Walter Cazzaniga, Daniele Cignoli, Eugenio Ventimiglia, Marina Pontillo, Massimo Alfano, Francesco Montorsi, Andrea Salonia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280519
_version_ 1797743309282607104
author Luca Boeri
Edoardo Pozzi
Paolo Capogrosso
Giuseppe Fallara
Federico Belladelli
Luigi Candela
Nicolò Schifano
Christian Corsini
Walter Cazzaniga
Daniele Cignoli
Eugenio Ventimiglia
Marina Pontillo
Massimo Alfano
Francesco Montorsi
Andrea Salonia
author_facet Luca Boeri
Edoardo Pozzi
Paolo Capogrosso
Giuseppe Fallara
Federico Belladelli
Luigi Candela
Nicolò Schifano
Christian Corsini
Walter Cazzaniga
Daniele Cignoli
Eugenio Ventimiglia
Marina Pontillo
Massimo Alfano
Francesco Montorsi
Andrea Salonia
author_sort Luca Boeri
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objectives</h4>To investigate which infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first semen analysis deserve a second semen test.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Data from 1358 consecutive infertile men were analysed. Patients underwent two consecutive semen analyses at the same laboratory. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models tested the association between clinical variables and semen parameters. A new predicting model was identified through logistic regression analysis exploring potential predictors of semen parameters below WHO reference limits after a previously normal one. Diagnostic accuracy of the new model was compared with AUA/ASRM and EAU guidelines. Decision curve analyses (DCA) tested their clinical benefit.<h4>Results</h4>Of 1358, 212 (15.6%) infertile men had semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first analysis. Of 212, 87 (41.0%) had a second semen analysis with results above WHO reference limits. Men with sperm parameters below reference limits at second analysis had higher FSH values, but lower testicular volume (TV) (all p<0.01) compared to men with a second semen analysis above WHO limits. At multivariable logistic regression analysis, lower TV (OR 0.9, p = 0.03), higher FSH (OR 1.2, p<0.01), and lower total sperm count (OR 0.9, p<0.01) were associated with second semen analyses below WHO limits. DCA showed the superior net benefit of using the new model, compared to both AUA/ASRM and EAU guidelines to identify those men with a second semen sample below WHO limits after a previously normal one.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Approximately 60% of infertile men with a first semen analysis above WHO limits have a second analysis with results below limits. The newly identified risk model might be useful to select infertile men with initial semen results above WHO limits who deserve a second semen analysis.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T14:53:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6260d202ec0e45f09ad5cd29789ab179
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T14:53:38Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-6260d202ec0e45f09ad5cd29789ab1792023-08-15T05:31:45ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01181e028051910.1371/journal.pone.0280519Infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first assessment may deserve a second semen analysis: Challenging the guidelines in the real-life scenario.Luca BoeriEdoardo PozziPaolo CapogrossoGiuseppe FallaraFederico BelladelliLuigi CandelaNicolò SchifanoChristian CorsiniWalter CazzanigaDaniele CignoliEugenio VentimigliaMarina PontilloMassimo AlfanoFrancesco MontorsiAndrea Salonia<h4>Objectives</h4>To investigate which infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first semen analysis deserve a second semen test.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Data from 1358 consecutive infertile men were analysed. Patients underwent two consecutive semen analyses at the same laboratory. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models tested the association between clinical variables and semen parameters. A new predicting model was identified through logistic regression analysis exploring potential predictors of semen parameters below WHO reference limits after a previously normal one. Diagnostic accuracy of the new model was compared with AUA/ASRM and EAU guidelines. Decision curve analyses (DCA) tested their clinical benefit.<h4>Results</h4>Of 1358, 212 (15.6%) infertile men had semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first analysis. Of 212, 87 (41.0%) had a second semen analysis with results above WHO reference limits. Men with sperm parameters below reference limits at second analysis had higher FSH values, but lower testicular volume (TV) (all p<0.01) compared to men with a second semen analysis above WHO limits. At multivariable logistic regression analysis, lower TV (OR 0.9, p = 0.03), higher FSH (OR 1.2, p<0.01), and lower total sperm count (OR 0.9, p<0.01) were associated with second semen analyses below WHO limits. DCA showed the superior net benefit of using the new model, compared to both AUA/ASRM and EAU guidelines to identify those men with a second semen sample below WHO limits after a previously normal one.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Approximately 60% of infertile men with a first semen analysis above WHO limits have a second analysis with results below limits. The newly identified risk model might be useful to select infertile men with initial semen results above WHO limits who deserve a second semen analysis.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280519
spellingShingle Luca Boeri
Edoardo Pozzi
Paolo Capogrosso
Giuseppe Fallara
Federico Belladelli
Luigi Candela
Nicolò Schifano
Christian Corsini
Walter Cazzaniga
Daniele Cignoli
Eugenio Ventimiglia
Marina Pontillo
Massimo Alfano
Francesco Montorsi
Andrea Salonia
Infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first assessment may deserve a second semen analysis: Challenging the guidelines in the real-life scenario.
PLoS ONE
title Infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first assessment may deserve a second semen analysis: Challenging the guidelines in the real-life scenario.
title_full Infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first assessment may deserve a second semen analysis: Challenging the guidelines in the real-life scenario.
title_fullStr Infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first assessment may deserve a second semen analysis: Challenging the guidelines in the real-life scenario.
title_full_unstemmed Infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first assessment may deserve a second semen analysis: Challenging the guidelines in the real-life scenario.
title_short Infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first assessment may deserve a second semen analysis: Challenging the guidelines in the real-life scenario.
title_sort infertile men with semen parameters above who reference limits at first assessment may deserve a second semen analysis challenging the guidelines in the real life scenario
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280519
work_keys_str_mv AT lucaboeri infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario
AT edoardopozzi infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario
AT paolocapogrosso infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario
AT giuseppefallara infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario
AT federicobelladelli infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario
AT luigicandela infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario
AT nicoloschifano infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario
AT christiancorsini infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario
AT waltercazzaniga infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario
AT danielecignoli infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario
AT eugenioventimiglia infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario
AT marinapontillo infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario
AT massimoalfano infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario
AT francescomontorsi infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario
AT andreasalonia infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario