Infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first assessment may deserve a second semen analysis: Challenging the guidelines in the real-life scenario.
<h4>Objectives</h4>To investigate which infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first semen analysis deserve a second semen test.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Data from 1358 consecutive infertile men were analysed. Patients underwent two consecutive...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2023-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280519 |
_version_ | 1797743309282607104 |
---|---|
author | Luca Boeri Edoardo Pozzi Paolo Capogrosso Giuseppe Fallara Federico Belladelli Luigi Candela Nicolò Schifano Christian Corsini Walter Cazzaniga Daniele Cignoli Eugenio Ventimiglia Marina Pontillo Massimo Alfano Francesco Montorsi Andrea Salonia |
author_facet | Luca Boeri Edoardo Pozzi Paolo Capogrosso Giuseppe Fallara Federico Belladelli Luigi Candela Nicolò Schifano Christian Corsini Walter Cazzaniga Daniele Cignoli Eugenio Ventimiglia Marina Pontillo Massimo Alfano Francesco Montorsi Andrea Salonia |
author_sort | Luca Boeri |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <h4>Objectives</h4>To investigate which infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first semen analysis deserve a second semen test.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Data from 1358 consecutive infertile men were analysed. Patients underwent two consecutive semen analyses at the same laboratory. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models tested the association between clinical variables and semen parameters. A new predicting model was identified through logistic regression analysis exploring potential predictors of semen parameters below WHO reference limits after a previously normal one. Diagnostic accuracy of the new model was compared with AUA/ASRM and EAU guidelines. Decision curve analyses (DCA) tested their clinical benefit.<h4>Results</h4>Of 1358, 212 (15.6%) infertile men had semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first analysis. Of 212, 87 (41.0%) had a second semen analysis with results above WHO reference limits. Men with sperm parameters below reference limits at second analysis had higher FSH values, but lower testicular volume (TV) (all p<0.01) compared to men with a second semen analysis above WHO limits. At multivariable logistic regression analysis, lower TV (OR 0.9, p = 0.03), higher FSH (OR 1.2, p<0.01), and lower total sperm count (OR 0.9, p<0.01) were associated with second semen analyses below WHO limits. DCA showed the superior net benefit of using the new model, compared to both AUA/ASRM and EAU guidelines to identify those men with a second semen sample below WHO limits after a previously normal one.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Approximately 60% of infertile men with a first semen analysis above WHO limits have a second analysis with results below limits. The newly identified risk model might be useful to select infertile men with initial semen results above WHO limits who deserve a second semen analysis. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T14:53:38Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6260d202ec0e45f09ad5cd29789ab179 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T14:53:38Z |
publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj.art-6260d202ec0e45f09ad5cd29789ab1792023-08-15T05:31:45ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01181e028051910.1371/journal.pone.0280519Infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first assessment may deserve a second semen analysis: Challenging the guidelines in the real-life scenario.Luca BoeriEdoardo PozziPaolo CapogrossoGiuseppe FallaraFederico BelladelliLuigi CandelaNicolò SchifanoChristian CorsiniWalter CazzanigaDaniele CignoliEugenio VentimigliaMarina PontilloMassimo AlfanoFrancesco MontorsiAndrea Salonia<h4>Objectives</h4>To investigate which infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first semen analysis deserve a second semen test.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Data from 1358 consecutive infertile men were analysed. Patients underwent two consecutive semen analyses at the same laboratory. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models tested the association between clinical variables and semen parameters. A new predicting model was identified through logistic regression analysis exploring potential predictors of semen parameters below WHO reference limits after a previously normal one. Diagnostic accuracy of the new model was compared with AUA/ASRM and EAU guidelines. Decision curve analyses (DCA) tested their clinical benefit.<h4>Results</h4>Of 1358, 212 (15.6%) infertile men had semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first analysis. Of 212, 87 (41.0%) had a second semen analysis with results above WHO reference limits. Men with sperm parameters below reference limits at second analysis had higher FSH values, but lower testicular volume (TV) (all p<0.01) compared to men with a second semen analysis above WHO limits. At multivariable logistic regression analysis, lower TV (OR 0.9, p = 0.03), higher FSH (OR 1.2, p<0.01), and lower total sperm count (OR 0.9, p<0.01) were associated with second semen analyses below WHO limits. DCA showed the superior net benefit of using the new model, compared to both AUA/ASRM and EAU guidelines to identify those men with a second semen sample below WHO limits after a previously normal one.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Approximately 60% of infertile men with a first semen analysis above WHO limits have a second analysis with results below limits. The newly identified risk model might be useful to select infertile men with initial semen results above WHO limits who deserve a second semen analysis.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280519 |
spellingShingle | Luca Boeri Edoardo Pozzi Paolo Capogrosso Giuseppe Fallara Federico Belladelli Luigi Candela Nicolò Schifano Christian Corsini Walter Cazzaniga Daniele Cignoli Eugenio Ventimiglia Marina Pontillo Massimo Alfano Francesco Montorsi Andrea Salonia Infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first assessment may deserve a second semen analysis: Challenging the guidelines in the real-life scenario. PLoS ONE |
title | Infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first assessment may deserve a second semen analysis: Challenging the guidelines in the real-life scenario. |
title_full | Infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first assessment may deserve a second semen analysis: Challenging the guidelines in the real-life scenario. |
title_fullStr | Infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first assessment may deserve a second semen analysis: Challenging the guidelines in the real-life scenario. |
title_full_unstemmed | Infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first assessment may deserve a second semen analysis: Challenging the guidelines in the real-life scenario. |
title_short | Infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first assessment may deserve a second semen analysis: Challenging the guidelines in the real-life scenario. |
title_sort | infertile men with semen parameters above who reference limits at first assessment may deserve a second semen analysis challenging the guidelines in the real life scenario |
url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280519 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lucaboeri infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario AT edoardopozzi infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario AT paolocapogrosso infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario AT giuseppefallara infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario AT federicobelladelli infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario AT luigicandela infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario AT nicoloschifano infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario AT christiancorsini infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario AT waltercazzaniga infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario AT danielecignoli infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario AT eugenioventimiglia infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario AT marinapontillo infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario AT massimoalfano infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario AT francescomontorsi infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario AT andreasalonia infertilemenwithsemenparametersabovewhoreferencelimitsatfirstassessmentmaydeserveasecondsemenanalysischallengingtheguidelinesinthereallifescenario |