| Summary: | Yanmei Luo,1,* Jie Liu,2,* Zhihui Jiang,3,* Xinghai Yang,1 Song Lin,1 Xiaowen Mao1 1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Pediatric Surgery, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of General Surgery, Qingdao Women and Children’s Hospital, Qingdao, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Xiaowen Mao; Song Lin, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No. 58 Guanggu Third Road, Donghu New Technology Development Zone, Wuhan City, 430070, Hubei Province, People’s Republic of China, Email xiaowenmao0927@163.com; yes888111@sina.cnPurpose: To compare and analyze the therapeutic effects of endoscopy-assisted laparoscopic surgery (EALS) and laparoscopic surgery (LS) in the treatment of gastric duplication cysts (GDCs).Patients and Methods: We reviewed the clinical data of children with GDCs who underwent surgical treatment at Hubei Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, and Qingdao Women and Children’s Medical Center from September 2014 to November 2022.Results: The study comprised 29 children with GDCs, including 14 in the EALS group and 15 in the LS group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, sex, weight, and cyst size characteristics. There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of average surgical time (P> 0.05), which was 1.100 ± 0.833 hours in the EALS group and 1.933 ± 0.159 hours in the LS group. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P< 0.05) in average intraoperative blood loss, which was 7.93 ± 3.81 milliliters in the EALS group and 11.80 ± 2.72 milliliters in the LS group. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P< 0.05) in average postoperative fasting time, which was 73.79 ± 8.36 hours in the EALS group and 114.1 ± 9.24 hours in the LS group. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P< 0.05) in average postoperative hospital stay, which was 10.21 ± 4.25 days in the EALS group and 14.47 ± 4.36 days in the LS group.Conclusion: EALS technology can not only shorten surgical time, accurately locate GDCs, reduce injuries, and decrease the probability of complications but also achieve treatment goals safely and reliably.Keywords: gastric duplication cyst, laparoscopic, endoscopic, surgery, children
|
|---|