Evaluation of buccal swabs for pharmacogenetics

Abstract Objective A simple, non-invasive sample collection method is key for the integration of pharmacogenetics into clinical practice. The aim of this study was to gain samples for pharmacogenetic testing and evaluate the variation between dry-flocked and sponge-tipped buccal swabs in yield and q...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Sidney Ang, Martin N. Aloise, Diana Dawes, Maryn G. Dempster, Robert Fraser, Andrea Paterson, Paul Stanley, Adriana Suarez-Gonzalez, Martin Dawes, Hagit Katzov-Eckert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-06-01
Series:BMC Research Notes
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-018-3476-5
_version_ 1819179520078381056
author J. Sidney Ang
Martin N. Aloise
Diana Dawes
Maryn G. Dempster
Robert Fraser
Andrea Paterson
Paul Stanley
Adriana Suarez-Gonzalez
Martin Dawes
Hagit Katzov-Eckert
author_facet J. Sidney Ang
Martin N. Aloise
Diana Dawes
Maryn G. Dempster
Robert Fraser
Andrea Paterson
Paul Stanley
Adriana Suarez-Gonzalez
Martin Dawes
Hagit Katzov-Eckert
author_sort J. Sidney Ang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective A simple, non-invasive sample collection method is key for the integration of pharmacogenetics into clinical practice. The aim of this study was to gain samples for pharmacogenetic testing and evaluate the variation between dry-flocked and sponge-tipped buccal swabs in yield and quality of DNA isolated. Results Thirty-one participants collected samples using dry-flocked swabs and sponge-tipped swabs. Samples were assessed for DNA yield, quality and genotyping performance on a qPCR OpenArray platform of 28 pharmacogenetic SNPs and a CYP2D6 TaqMan copy number variant. DNA from sponge-tipped swabs had a significantly greater yield compared to DNA collected with dry-flocked swabs (p = 4.4 × 10−7). Moreover, highest genotyping call rates across all assays and highest CNV confidence scores were observed in DNA samples collected from sponge-tipped swabs (97% vs. 54% dry-flocked swabs; 0.99 vs. 0.88 dry-flocked swabs, respectively). Sample collection using sponge-tipped swabs provides a DNA source of sufficient quantity and quality for pharmacogenetic variant detection using qPCR.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T21:59:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-626c8179f91c49438d592775f4924cd7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1756-0500
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T21:59:45Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Research Notes
spelling doaj.art-626c8179f91c49438d592775f4924cd72022-12-21T18:11:08ZengBMCBMC Research Notes1756-05002018-06-011111510.1186/s13104-018-3476-5Evaluation of buccal swabs for pharmacogeneticsJ. Sidney Ang0Martin N. Aloise1Diana Dawes2Maryn G. Dempster3Robert Fraser4Andrea Paterson5Paul Stanley6Adriana Suarez-Gonzalez7Martin Dawes8Hagit Katzov-Eckert9GenXys Health Care Systems Inc.GenXys Health Care Systems Inc.GenXys Health Care Systems Inc.GenXys Health Care Systems Inc.Molecular You Inc.GenXys Health Care Systems Inc.GenXys Health Care Systems Inc.GenXys Health Care Systems Inc.GenXys Health Care Systems Inc.GenXys Health Care Systems Inc.Abstract Objective A simple, non-invasive sample collection method is key for the integration of pharmacogenetics into clinical practice. The aim of this study was to gain samples for pharmacogenetic testing and evaluate the variation between dry-flocked and sponge-tipped buccal swabs in yield and quality of DNA isolated. Results Thirty-one participants collected samples using dry-flocked swabs and sponge-tipped swabs. Samples were assessed for DNA yield, quality and genotyping performance on a qPCR OpenArray platform of 28 pharmacogenetic SNPs and a CYP2D6 TaqMan copy number variant. DNA from sponge-tipped swabs had a significantly greater yield compared to DNA collected with dry-flocked swabs (p = 4.4 × 10−7). Moreover, highest genotyping call rates across all assays and highest CNV confidence scores were observed in DNA samples collected from sponge-tipped swabs (97% vs. 54% dry-flocked swabs; 0.99 vs. 0.88 dry-flocked swabs, respectively). Sample collection using sponge-tipped swabs provides a DNA source of sufficient quantity and quality for pharmacogenetic variant detection using qPCR.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-018-3476-5Sample collectionBuccal swabsOpenArrayCopy number variationPharmacogenetics
spellingShingle J. Sidney Ang
Martin N. Aloise
Diana Dawes
Maryn G. Dempster
Robert Fraser
Andrea Paterson
Paul Stanley
Adriana Suarez-Gonzalez
Martin Dawes
Hagit Katzov-Eckert
Evaluation of buccal swabs for pharmacogenetics
BMC Research Notes
Sample collection
Buccal swabs
OpenArray
Copy number variation
Pharmacogenetics
title Evaluation of buccal swabs for pharmacogenetics
title_full Evaluation of buccal swabs for pharmacogenetics
title_fullStr Evaluation of buccal swabs for pharmacogenetics
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of buccal swabs for pharmacogenetics
title_short Evaluation of buccal swabs for pharmacogenetics
title_sort evaluation of buccal swabs for pharmacogenetics
topic Sample collection
Buccal swabs
OpenArray
Copy number variation
Pharmacogenetics
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-018-3476-5
work_keys_str_mv AT jsidneyang evaluationofbuccalswabsforpharmacogenetics
AT martinnaloise evaluationofbuccalswabsforpharmacogenetics
AT dianadawes evaluationofbuccalswabsforpharmacogenetics
AT maryngdempster evaluationofbuccalswabsforpharmacogenetics
AT robertfraser evaluationofbuccalswabsforpharmacogenetics
AT andreapaterson evaluationofbuccalswabsforpharmacogenetics
AT paulstanley evaluationofbuccalswabsforpharmacogenetics
AT adrianasuarezgonzalez evaluationofbuccalswabsforpharmacogenetics
AT martindawes evaluationofbuccalswabsforpharmacogenetics
AT hagitkatzoveckert evaluationofbuccalswabsforpharmacogenetics