Could mid-upper arm circumference be a valid proxy to the body mass index for elderly persons?

Introduction: In elderly persons, due to physiological, anatomical, and functional changes, body mass index (BMI) may not be suitable for the assessment of nutritional status. Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) can be a proxy indicator to identify underweight and overweight/obesity among elderly per...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anil Kumar Goswami, Ramadass Sathiyamoorthy, Kalaivani Mani, Shashi Kant, Sanjeev Kumar Gupta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2022-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Community and Family Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijcfm.org/article.asp?issn=2395-2113;year=2022;volume=8;issue=2;spage=143;epage=147;aulast=Goswami
_version_ 1797866565790597120
author Anil Kumar Goswami
Ramadass Sathiyamoorthy
Kalaivani Mani
Shashi Kant
Sanjeev Kumar Gupta
author_facet Anil Kumar Goswami
Ramadass Sathiyamoorthy
Kalaivani Mani
Shashi Kant
Sanjeev Kumar Gupta
author_sort Anil Kumar Goswami
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: In elderly persons, due to physiological, anatomical, and functional changes, body mass index (BMI) may not be suitable for the assessment of nutritional status. Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) can be a proxy indicator to identify underweight and overweight/obesity among elderly persons. This study aimed to estimate the correlation between MUAC and BMI, and the cutoffs for MUAC using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Material and Methods: This survey was carried out in a resettlement colony of Delhi. The participants were residents of the area who were aged 60 years or older, and selected by a simple random sampling technique. The arm span, weight, and MUAC of the participants were measured. The correlation between MUAC and BMI for gender and age group was calculated. The ROC curve was also constructed. Results: A total of 946 eligible participants were enrolled. The correlation between MUAC and BMI was 0.67 (P < 0.001) and 0.76 (P < 0.001) among men and women, respectively. The MUAC cutoff for underweight was <25 cm with a sensitivity of 68.8% and specificity of 84.9%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.84 (0.80–0.88). The MUAC cutoff for overweight/obesity was ≥27 cm with a sensitivity of 83.9% and specificity of 64.9%, and AUC was 0.78 (0.75–0.82). Conclusion: The MUAC of the participants increased as the BMI of the participants increased. MUAC cutoff was determined using the ROC curve for underweight and overweight/obesity among elderly persons.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T23:27:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-627ec11ea693456ca3d104eafd9e63bb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2395-2113
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T23:27:15Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Community and Family Medicine
spelling doaj.art-627ec11ea693456ca3d104eafd9e63bb2023-03-21T08:41:50ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Community and Family Medicine2395-21132022-01-018214314710.4103/ijcfm.ijcfm_23_22Could mid-upper arm circumference be a valid proxy to the body mass index for elderly persons?Anil Kumar GoswamiRamadass SathiyamoorthyKalaivani ManiShashi KantSanjeev Kumar GuptaIntroduction: In elderly persons, due to physiological, anatomical, and functional changes, body mass index (BMI) may not be suitable for the assessment of nutritional status. Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) can be a proxy indicator to identify underweight and overweight/obesity among elderly persons. This study aimed to estimate the correlation between MUAC and BMI, and the cutoffs for MUAC using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Material and Methods: This survey was carried out in a resettlement colony of Delhi. The participants were residents of the area who were aged 60 years or older, and selected by a simple random sampling technique. The arm span, weight, and MUAC of the participants were measured. The correlation between MUAC and BMI for gender and age group was calculated. The ROC curve was also constructed. Results: A total of 946 eligible participants were enrolled. The correlation between MUAC and BMI was 0.67 (P < 0.001) and 0.76 (P < 0.001) among men and women, respectively. The MUAC cutoff for underweight was <25 cm with a sensitivity of 68.8% and specificity of 84.9%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.84 (0.80–0.88). The MUAC cutoff for overweight/obesity was ≥27 cm with a sensitivity of 83.9% and specificity of 64.9%, and AUC was 0.78 (0.75–0.82). Conclusion: The MUAC of the participants increased as the BMI of the participants increased. MUAC cutoff was determined using the ROC curve for underweight and overweight/obesity among elderly persons.http://www.ijcfm.org/article.asp?issn=2395-2113;year=2022;volume=8;issue=2;spage=143;epage=147;aulast=Goswamibody mass indexelderly personsmid-upper arm circumferencenutritional assessment
spellingShingle Anil Kumar Goswami
Ramadass Sathiyamoorthy
Kalaivani Mani
Shashi Kant
Sanjeev Kumar Gupta
Could mid-upper arm circumference be a valid proxy to the body mass index for elderly persons?
Indian Journal of Community and Family Medicine
body mass index
elderly persons
mid-upper arm circumference
nutritional assessment
title Could mid-upper arm circumference be a valid proxy to the body mass index for elderly persons?
title_full Could mid-upper arm circumference be a valid proxy to the body mass index for elderly persons?
title_fullStr Could mid-upper arm circumference be a valid proxy to the body mass index for elderly persons?
title_full_unstemmed Could mid-upper arm circumference be a valid proxy to the body mass index for elderly persons?
title_short Could mid-upper arm circumference be a valid proxy to the body mass index for elderly persons?
title_sort could mid upper arm circumference be a valid proxy to the body mass index for elderly persons
topic body mass index
elderly persons
mid-upper arm circumference
nutritional assessment
url http://www.ijcfm.org/article.asp?issn=2395-2113;year=2022;volume=8;issue=2;spage=143;epage=147;aulast=Goswami
work_keys_str_mv AT anilkumargoswami couldmidupperarmcircumferencebeavalidproxytothebodymassindexforelderlypersons
AT ramadasssathiyamoorthy couldmidupperarmcircumferencebeavalidproxytothebodymassindexforelderlypersons
AT kalaivanimani couldmidupperarmcircumferencebeavalidproxytothebodymassindexforelderlypersons
AT shashikant couldmidupperarmcircumferencebeavalidproxytothebodymassindexforelderlypersons
AT sanjeevkumargupta couldmidupperarmcircumferencebeavalidproxytothebodymassindexforelderlypersons