The Role of Trust in Argumentation
Argumentation is important for sharing knowledge and information. Given that the receiver of an argument purportedly engages first and foremost with its content, one might expect trust to play a negligible epistemic role, as opposed to its crucial role in testimony. I argue on the contrary that trus...
Main Author: | Catarina Dutilh Novaes |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Windsor
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Informal Logic |
Online Access: | https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/6328 |
Similar Items
-
Dependability arguments with trusted bases
by: Kang, Eunsuk, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Towards a Practice-based Philosophy of Logic: Formal Languages as a Case Study
by: Catarina Dutilh Novaes
Published: (2012-04-01) -
Formalizing Medieval Logical Theories [electronic book] : Suppositio, Consequentiae and Obligationes/
by: 356461 Dutilh Novaes, Catarina
Published: (2007) -
Epistemic trust in oneself and others – an argument from analogy?
by: Fricker, L
Published: (2013) -
The Influence of Argument Quality and Information Richness on Trust in Halal Cosmetic Reviews
by: Aufa Aviska Rahma Haryono, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)