Fat-suppressed T2 mapping of human knee femoral articular cartilage: comparison with conventional T2 mapping

Abstract Background There is paucity of studies applying fat suppressed (FS) technique to T2 mapping to overcome chemical shift artifacts. The purpose of the study is to difference between FS T2 and conventional T2 mapping and reproducibility of FS T2 mapping in the femoral articular cartilage. Meth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bo Ram Kim, Hye Jin Yoo, Hee-Dong Chae, Sung Hwan Hong, Ja-Young Choi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-08-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04542-9
_version_ 1818717897752576000
author Bo Ram Kim
Hye Jin Yoo
Hee-Dong Chae
Sung Hwan Hong
Ja-Young Choi
author_facet Bo Ram Kim
Hye Jin Yoo
Hee-Dong Chae
Sung Hwan Hong
Ja-Young Choi
author_sort Bo Ram Kim
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background There is paucity of studies applying fat suppressed (FS) technique to T2 mapping to overcome chemical shift artifacts. The purpose of the study is to difference between FS T2 and conventional T2 mapping and reproducibility of FS T2 mapping in the femoral articular cartilage. Methods Eighteen patients who had normal-looking femoral cartilage and underwent knee MRI with conventional T2 and FS T2 mapping were included. T2 values of each mapping were measured by two readers independently from nine regions in the medial femoral condyle (MFC) and lateral femoral condyle (LFC). Each anatomical region was divided by lines at ± 10°, 30°, 50°, 70°, 90°, and 110°. Comparisons of T2 values between conventional and FS T2 mapping were statistically analyzed. The T2 values between FS and conventional T2 mapping in the anterior, central and posterior femoral condyles were compared. Results The overall femoral condyle T2 values from the FS T2 map were significantly lower than those from the conventional T2 map (48.5ms vs. 51.0ms, p < 0.001). The differences in the T2 values between the two maps were significantly different among the three divisions of the LFC (p = 0.009) and MFC (p = 0.031). The intra-class correlation coefficients indicated higher agreement in the FS T2 map than in the conventional T2 map (0.943 vs. 0.872). Conclusions The T2 values of knee femoral cartilage are significantly lower on FS T2 mapping than on conventional T2 mapping. FS T2 mapping is a more reproducible method for evaluating knee femoral cartilage.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T19:42:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-62a9fa92b2f540019507da3ed21bf775
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2474
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T19:42:27Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
spelling doaj.art-62a9fa92b2f540019507da3ed21bf7752022-12-21T21:34:58ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742021-08-012211810.1186/s12891-021-04542-9Fat-suppressed T2 mapping of human knee femoral articular cartilage: comparison with conventional T2 mappingBo Ram Kim0Hye Jin Yoo1Hee-Dong Chae2Sung Hwan Hong3Ja-Young Choi4Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang HospitalDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University HospitalDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University HospitalDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University HospitalDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University HospitalAbstract Background There is paucity of studies applying fat suppressed (FS) technique to T2 mapping to overcome chemical shift artifacts. The purpose of the study is to difference between FS T2 and conventional T2 mapping and reproducibility of FS T2 mapping in the femoral articular cartilage. Methods Eighteen patients who had normal-looking femoral cartilage and underwent knee MRI with conventional T2 and FS T2 mapping were included. T2 values of each mapping were measured by two readers independently from nine regions in the medial femoral condyle (MFC) and lateral femoral condyle (LFC). Each anatomical region was divided by lines at ± 10°, 30°, 50°, 70°, 90°, and 110°. Comparisons of T2 values between conventional and FS T2 mapping were statistically analyzed. The T2 values between FS and conventional T2 mapping in the anterior, central and posterior femoral condyles were compared. Results The overall femoral condyle T2 values from the FS T2 map were significantly lower than those from the conventional T2 map (48.5ms vs. 51.0ms, p < 0.001). The differences in the T2 values between the two maps were significantly different among the three divisions of the LFC (p = 0.009) and MFC (p = 0.031). The intra-class correlation coefficients indicated higher agreement in the FS T2 map than in the conventional T2 map (0.943 vs. 0.872). Conclusions The T2 values of knee femoral cartilage are significantly lower on FS T2 mapping than on conventional T2 mapping. FS T2 mapping is a more reproducible method for evaluating knee femoral cartilage.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04542-9MRICartilageKneeT2 mappingFat suppression techniqueRelaxomatry
spellingShingle Bo Ram Kim
Hye Jin Yoo
Hee-Dong Chae
Sung Hwan Hong
Ja-Young Choi
Fat-suppressed T2 mapping of human knee femoral articular cartilage: comparison with conventional T2 mapping
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
MRI
Cartilage
Knee
T2 mapping
Fat suppression technique
Relaxomatry
title Fat-suppressed T2 mapping of human knee femoral articular cartilage: comparison with conventional T2 mapping
title_full Fat-suppressed T2 mapping of human knee femoral articular cartilage: comparison with conventional T2 mapping
title_fullStr Fat-suppressed T2 mapping of human knee femoral articular cartilage: comparison with conventional T2 mapping
title_full_unstemmed Fat-suppressed T2 mapping of human knee femoral articular cartilage: comparison with conventional T2 mapping
title_short Fat-suppressed T2 mapping of human knee femoral articular cartilage: comparison with conventional T2 mapping
title_sort fat suppressed t2 mapping of human knee femoral articular cartilage comparison with conventional t2 mapping
topic MRI
Cartilage
Knee
T2 mapping
Fat suppression technique
Relaxomatry
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04542-9
work_keys_str_mv AT boramkim fatsuppressedt2mappingofhumankneefemoralarticularcartilagecomparisonwithconventionalt2mapping
AT hyejinyoo fatsuppressedt2mappingofhumankneefemoralarticularcartilagecomparisonwithconventionalt2mapping
AT heedongchae fatsuppressedt2mappingofhumankneefemoralarticularcartilagecomparisonwithconventionalt2mapping
AT sunghwanhong fatsuppressedt2mappingofhumankneefemoralarticularcartilagecomparisonwithconventionalt2mapping
AT jayoungchoi fatsuppressedt2mappingofhumankneefemoralarticularcartilagecomparisonwithconventionalt2mapping