Comparative Mitogenomics of Flesh Flies: Implications for Phylogeny

Flesh flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) represent a rapid radiation belonging to the Calyptratae. With more than 3000 known species, they are extraordinarily diverse in terms of their breeding habits and are therefore of particular importance in human and veterinary medicine, forensics, and ecology. To...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jin Shang, Wentian Xu, Xiaofang Huang, Dong Zhang, Liping Yan, Thomas Pape
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-08-01
Series:Insects
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/13/8/718
_version_ 1827627462480101376
author Jin Shang
Wentian Xu
Xiaofang Huang
Dong Zhang
Liping Yan
Thomas Pape
author_facet Jin Shang
Wentian Xu
Xiaofang Huang
Dong Zhang
Liping Yan
Thomas Pape
author_sort Jin Shang
collection DOAJ
description Flesh flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) represent a rapid radiation belonging to the Calyptratae. With more than 3000 known species, they are extraordinarily diverse in terms of their breeding habits and are therefore of particular importance in human and veterinary medicine, forensics, and ecology. To better comprehend the phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary characteristics of the Sarcophagidae, we sequenced the complete mitochondrial genomes of five species of flesh flies and performed mitogenomic comparisons amongst the three subfamilies. The mitochondrial genomes match the hypothetical condition of the insect ancestor in terms of gene content and gene arrangement. The evolutionary rates of the subfamilies of Sarcophagidae differ significantly, with Miltogramminae exhibiting a higher rate than the other two subfamilies. The monophyly of the Sarcophagidae and each subfamily is strongly supported by phylogenetic analysis, with the subfamily-level relationship inferred as (Sarcophaginae, (Miltogramminae, Paramacronychiinae)). This study suggests that phylogenetic analysis based on mitochondrial genomes may not be appropriate for rapidly evolving groups such as Miltogramminae and that the third-codon positions could play a considerable role in reconstructing the phylogeny of Sarcophagidae. The protein-coding genes ND2 and ND6 have the potential to be employed as DNA markers for species identification and delimitation in flesh flies.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T13:13:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-62aaa06477b449e08fe98bb63c9da864
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4450
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T13:13:20Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Insects
spelling doaj.art-62aaa06477b449e08fe98bb63c9da8642023-11-30T21:39:10ZengMDPI AGInsects2075-44502022-08-0113871810.3390/insects13080718Comparative Mitogenomics of Flesh Flies: Implications for PhylogenyJin Shang0Wentian Xu1Xiaofang Huang2Dong Zhang3Liping Yan4Thomas Pape5School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, ChinaSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, ChinaSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, ChinaSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, ChinaSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, ChinaNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, DenmarkFlesh flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) represent a rapid radiation belonging to the Calyptratae. With more than 3000 known species, they are extraordinarily diverse in terms of their breeding habits and are therefore of particular importance in human and veterinary medicine, forensics, and ecology. To better comprehend the phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary characteristics of the Sarcophagidae, we sequenced the complete mitochondrial genomes of five species of flesh flies and performed mitogenomic comparisons amongst the three subfamilies. The mitochondrial genomes match the hypothetical condition of the insect ancestor in terms of gene content and gene arrangement. The evolutionary rates of the subfamilies of Sarcophagidae differ significantly, with Miltogramminae exhibiting a higher rate than the other two subfamilies. The monophyly of the Sarcophagidae and each subfamily is strongly supported by phylogenetic analysis, with the subfamily-level relationship inferred as (Sarcophaginae, (Miltogramminae, Paramacronychiinae)). This study suggests that phylogenetic analysis based on mitochondrial genomes may not be appropriate for rapidly evolving groups such as Miltogramminae and that the third-codon positions could play a considerable role in reconstructing the phylogeny of Sarcophagidae. The protein-coding genes ND2 and ND6 have the potential to be employed as DNA markers for species identification and delimitation in flesh flies.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/13/8/718mitogenomesarcophagidaephylogenyevolution
spellingShingle Jin Shang
Wentian Xu
Xiaofang Huang
Dong Zhang
Liping Yan
Thomas Pape
Comparative Mitogenomics of Flesh Flies: Implications for Phylogeny
Insects
mitogenome
sarcophagidae
phylogeny
evolution
title Comparative Mitogenomics of Flesh Flies: Implications for Phylogeny
title_full Comparative Mitogenomics of Flesh Flies: Implications for Phylogeny
title_fullStr Comparative Mitogenomics of Flesh Flies: Implications for Phylogeny
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Mitogenomics of Flesh Flies: Implications for Phylogeny
title_short Comparative Mitogenomics of Flesh Flies: Implications for Phylogeny
title_sort comparative mitogenomics of flesh flies implications for phylogeny
topic mitogenome
sarcophagidae
phylogeny
evolution
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/13/8/718
work_keys_str_mv AT jinshang comparativemitogenomicsoffleshfliesimplicationsforphylogeny
AT wentianxu comparativemitogenomicsoffleshfliesimplicationsforphylogeny
AT xiaofanghuang comparativemitogenomicsoffleshfliesimplicationsforphylogeny
AT dongzhang comparativemitogenomicsoffleshfliesimplicationsforphylogeny
AT lipingyan comparativemitogenomicsoffleshfliesimplicationsforphylogeny
AT thomaspape comparativemitogenomicsoffleshfliesimplicationsforphylogeny