Comparative analysis of extreme ultraviolet solar radiation proxies during minimum activity levels

Four extreme ultraviolet (EUV) solar radiation proxies (Magnesium II core-to-wing ratio (MgII), Lyman α flux (Fα), 10.7-cm solar radio flux (F10.7), and sunspot number (Rz)) were analyzed during the last four consecutive solar activity minima to investigate how they differ during minimum periods and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. G. Elias, C. R. Martinis, B. F. de Haro Barbas, F. D. Medina, B. S. Zossi, M. Fagre, T. Duran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Science Press 2023-09-01
Series:Earth and Planetary Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.eppcgs.org/article/doi/10.26464/epp2023050?pageType=en
_version_ 1797692529951375360
author A. G. Elias
C. R. Martinis
B. F. de Haro Barbas
F. D. Medina
B. S. Zossi
M. Fagre
T. Duran
author_facet A. G. Elias
C. R. Martinis
B. F. de Haro Barbas
F. D. Medina
B. S. Zossi
M. Fagre
T. Duran
author_sort A. G. Elias
collection DOAJ
description Four extreme ultraviolet (EUV) solar radiation proxies (Magnesium II core-to-wing ratio (MgII), Lyman α flux (Fα), 10.7-cm solar radio flux (F10.7), and sunspot number (Rz)) were analyzed during the last four consecutive solar activity minima to investigate how they differ during minimum periods and how well they represent solar EUV radiation. Their variability within each minimum and between minima was compared by considering monthly means. A comparison was also made of their role in filtering the effect of solar activity from the critical frequency of the ionospheric F2 layer, foF2, which at mid to low latitudes depends mainly on EUV solar radiation. The last two solar cycles showed unusually low EUV radiation levels according to the four proxies. Regarding the connection between the EUV “true” variation and that of solar proxies, according to the foF2 filtering analysis, MgII and Fα behaved in a more stable and suitable way, whereas Rz and F10.7 could be overestimating EUV levels during the last two minima, implying they would both underestimate the inter-minima difference of EUV when compared with the first two minima.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T02:28:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-62abac3cada246f78186ab7901e9e198
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2096-3955
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T02:28:56Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Science Press
record_format Article
series Earth and Planetary Physics
spelling doaj.art-62abac3cada246f78186ab7901e9e1982023-09-05T09:56:43ZengScience PressEarth and Planetary Physics2096-39552023-09-017554054710.26464/epp2023050RA367-EliasComparative analysis of extreme ultraviolet solar radiation proxies during minimum activity levelsA. G. Elias0C. R. Martinis1B. F. de Haro Barbas2F. D. Medina3B. S. Zossi4M. Fagre5T. Duran6Laboratorio de Ionosfera, Atmosfera Neutra y Magnetosfera, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnologia (FACET), Universidad Nacional de Tucuman (UNT), Tucuman 4000, ArgentinaCenter for Space Physics, Astronomy Department, Boston University, MA 02215, USALaboratorio de Ionosfera, Atmosfera Neutra y Magnetosfera, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnologia (FACET), Universidad Nacional de Tucuman (UNT), Tucuman 4000, ArgentinaLaboratorio de Ionosfera, Atmosfera Neutra y Magnetosfera, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnologia (FACET), Universidad Nacional de Tucuman (UNT), Tucuman 4000, ArgentinaLaboratorio de Ionosfera, Atmosfera Neutra y Magnetosfera, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnologia (FACET), Universidad Nacional de Tucuman (UNT), Tucuman 4000, ArgentinaCONICET, Tucuman 4000, ArgentinaDepartamento de Física, Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS), Bahia Blanca 8000, ArgentinaFour extreme ultraviolet (EUV) solar radiation proxies (Magnesium II core-to-wing ratio (MgII), Lyman α flux (Fα), 10.7-cm solar radio flux (F10.7), and sunspot number (Rz)) were analyzed during the last four consecutive solar activity minima to investigate how they differ during minimum periods and how well they represent solar EUV radiation. Their variability within each minimum and between minima was compared by considering monthly means. A comparison was also made of their role in filtering the effect of solar activity from the critical frequency of the ionospheric F2 layer, foF2, which at mid to low latitudes depends mainly on EUV solar radiation. The last two solar cycles showed unusually low EUV radiation levels according to the four proxies. Regarding the connection between the EUV “true” variation and that of solar proxies, according to the foF2 filtering analysis, MgII and Fα behaved in a more stable and suitable way, whereas Rz and F10.7 could be overestimating EUV levels during the last two minima, implying they would both underestimate the inter-minima difference of EUV when compared with the first two minima.http://www.eppcgs.org/article/doi/10.26464/epp2023050?pageType=ensolar euv radiationsolar minimumfof2solar activitysolar euv proxy
spellingShingle A. G. Elias
C. R. Martinis
B. F. de Haro Barbas
F. D. Medina
B. S. Zossi
M. Fagre
T. Duran
Comparative analysis of extreme ultraviolet solar radiation proxies during minimum activity levels
Earth and Planetary Physics
solar euv radiation
solar minimum
fof2
solar activity
solar euv proxy
title Comparative analysis of extreme ultraviolet solar radiation proxies during minimum activity levels
title_full Comparative analysis of extreme ultraviolet solar radiation proxies during minimum activity levels
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of extreme ultraviolet solar radiation proxies during minimum activity levels
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of extreme ultraviolet solar radiation proxies during minimum activity levels
title_short Comparative analysis of extreme ultraviolet solar radiation proxies during minimum activity levels
title_sort comparative analysis of extreme ultraviolet solar radiation proxies during minimum activity levels
topic solar euv radiation
solar minimum
fof2
solar activity
solar euv proxy
url http://www.eppcgs.org/article/doi/10.26464/epp2023050?pageType=en
work_keys_str_mv AT agelias comparativeanalysisofextremeultravioletsolarradiationproxiesduringminimumactivitylevels
AT crmartinis comparativeanalysisofextremeultravioletsolarradiationproxiesduringminimumactivitylevels
AT bfdeharobarbas comparativeanalysisofextremeultravioletsolarradiationproxiesduringminimumactivitylevels
AT fdmedina comparativeanalysisofextremeultravioletsolarradiationproxiesduringminimumactivitylevels
AT bszossi comparativeanalysisofextremeultravioletsolarradiationproxiesduringminimumactivitylevels
AT mfagre comparativeanalysisofextremeultravioletsolarradiationproxiesduringminimumactivitylevels
AT tduran comparativeanalysisofextremeultravioletsolarradiationproxiesduringminimumactivitylevels