Day-roost tree selection by northern long-eared bats—What do non-roost tree comparisons and one year of data really tell us?

Bat day-roost selection often is described through comparisons of day-roosts with randomly selected, and assumed unused, trees. Relatively few studies, however, look at patterns of multi-year selection or compare day-roosts used across years. We explored day-roost selection using 2 years of roost se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexander Silvis, W. Mark Ford, Eric R. Britzke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2015-01-01
Series:Global Ecology and Conservation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989415000347
_version_ 1819136565950021632
author Alexander Silvis
W. Mark Ford
Eric R. Britzke
author_facet Alexander Silvis
W. Mark Ford
Eric R. Britzke
author_sort Alexander Silvis
collection DOAJ
description Bat day-roost selection often is described through comparisons of day-roosts with randomly selected, and assumed unused, trees. Relatively few studies, however, look at patterns of multi-year selection or compare day-roosts used across years. We explored day-roost selection using 2 years of roost selection data for female northern long-eared bats (Myotis septentrionalis) on the Fort Knox Military Reservation, Kentucky, USA. We compared characteristics of randomly selected non-roost trees and day-roosts using a multinomial logistic model and day-roost species selection using chi-squared tests. We found that factors differentiating day-roosts from non-roosts and day-roosts between years varied. Day-roosts differed from non-roosts in the first year of data in all measured factors, but only in size and decay stage in the second year. Between years, day-roosts differed in size and canopy position, but not decay stage. Day-roost species selection was non-random and did not differ between years. Although bats used multiple trees, our results suggest that there were additional unused trees that were suitable as roosts at any time. Day-roost selection pattern descriptions will be inadequate if based only on a single year of data, and inferences of roost selection based only on comparisons of roost to non-roosts should be limited.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T10:37:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-62abe1d5bab0472ebf113142d1779319
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2351-9894
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T10:37:00Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Global Ecology and Conservation
spelling doaj.art-62abe1d5bab0472ebf113142d17793192022-12-21T18:29:08ZengElsevierGlobal Ecology and Conservation2351-98942015-01-013C75676310.1016/j.gecco.2015.03.008Day-roost tree selection by northern long-eared bats—What do non-roost tree comparisons and one year of data really tell us?Alexander Silvis0W. Mark Ford1Eric R. Britzke2Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, United StatesDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, United StatesUS Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Environmental Laboratory, 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS 39180, United StatesBat day-roost selection often is described through comparisons of day-roosts with randomly selected, and assumed unused, trees. Relatively few studies, however, look at patterns of multi-year selection or compare day-roosts used across years. We explored day-roost selection using 2 years of roost selection data for female northern long-eared bats (Myotis septentrionalis) on the Fort Knox Military Reservation, Kentucky, USA. We compared characteristics of randomly selected non-roost trees and day-roosts using a multinomial logistic model and day-roost species selection using chi-squared tests. We found that factors differentiating day-roosts from non-roosts and day-roosts between years varied. Day-roosts differed from non-roosts in the first year of data in all measured factors, but only in size and decay stage in the second year. Between years, day-roosts differed in size and canopy position, but not decay stage. Day-roost species selection was non-random and did not differ between years. Although bats used multiple trees, our results suggest that there were additional unused trees that were suitable as roosts at any time. Day-roost selection pattern descriptions will be inadequate if based only on a single year of data, and inferences of roost selection based only on comparisons of roost to non-roosts should be limited.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989415000347Myotis septentrionalisNorthern long-eared batDay-roost selectionDay-roost comparisonMultinomialRoost selection
spellingShingle Alexander Silvis
W. Mark Ford
Eric R. Britzke
Day-roost tree selection by northern long-eared bats—What do non-roost tree comparisons and one year of data really tell us?
Global Ecology and Conservation
Myotis septentrionalis
Northern long-eared bat
Day-roost selection
Day-roost comparison
Multinomial
Roost selection
title Day-roost tree selection by northern long-eared bats—What do non-roost tree comparisons and one year of data really tell us?
title_full Day-roost tree selection by northern long-eared bats—What do non-roost tree comparisons and one year of data really tell us?
title_fullStr Day-roost tree selection by northern long-eared bats—What do non-roost tree comparisons and one year of data really tell us?
title_full_unstemmed Day-roost tree selection by northern long-eared bats—What do non-roost tree comparisons and one year of data really tell us?
title_short Day-roost tree selection by northern long-eared bats—What do non-roost tree comparisons and one year of data really tell us?
title_sort day roost tree selection by northern long eared bats what do non roost tree comparisons and one year of data really tell us
topic Myotis septentrionalis
Northern long-eared bat
Day-roost selection
Day-roost comparison
Multinomial
Roost selection
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989415000347
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandersilvis dayroosttreeselectionbynorthernlongearedbatswhatdononroosttreecomparisonsandoneyearofdatareallytellus
AT wmarkford dayroosttreeselectionbynorthernlongearedbatswhatdononroosttreecomparisonsandoneyearofdatareallytellus
AT ericrbritzke dayroosttreeselectionbynorthernlongearedbatswhatdononroosttreecomparisonsandoneyearofdatareallytellus