A controlled, double blind, study of adding Nalbuphine to Propofol for laryngeal mask insertion conditions and hemodynamics in adults

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate laryngeal mask airway placement conditions achieved with Nalbuphine/Propofol combination when given intravenously as well as hemodynamic changes if any. Methods: 60 ASA grade 1 and 11 patients of age group 20–60 years, scheduled for general anesthes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ossama Hamdy Salman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2015-10-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110184915000549
_version_ 1818446703773089792
author Ossama Hamdy Salman
author_facet Ossama Hamdy Salman
author_sort Ossama Hamdy Salman
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate laryngeal mask airway placement conditions achieved with Nalbuphine/Propofol combination when given intravenously as well as hemodynamic changes if any. Methods: 60 ASA grade 1 and 11 patients of age group 20–60 years, scheduled for general anesthesia with spontaneous breathing were randomly allocated to receive intravenously either Fentanyl 2 μg/kg, controlled group (Group F, n = 30) or Nalbuphine 0.2 mg/kg (Group N, n = 30), before induction of anesthesia with Propofol 2–2.5 mg/kg. Heart rate and arterial blood pressure were measured before induction of anesthesia and at 1, 3, and 5 min after LMA insertion. Assessment of LMA insertion was done using 6 variables: mouth opening, gagging, swallowing, head and limb movements, laryngospasm and resistance to insertion. Incidence and duration of apnea were recorded. Results: The incidence of coughing/gagging was higher in the F group (50%) compared to the N group (30%), (P = 0.019). Swallowing was also statistically significant (P = 0.017), being higher in F group (50%), compared to N group (16.6%). Limb moving followed the same pattern being higher in the F group (40%) compared to (13.3%) in the N group, (P = 0.008). Laryngospasm was seen in neither group. There was also statistically significant difference (P = 0.007) in the incidence of apnea between the control group (F) 86.6% and (N) group. Heart rate variation and MAP changes were not statistically significant in either F or N groups. Conclusion: The addition of Nalbuphine to Propofol for LMA insertion provides excellent insertion conditions with stable hemodynamics in adults.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T19:51:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-62b127f22913403d9a6771cf5ceaa996
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1110-1849
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T19:51:57Z
publishDate 2015-10-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
spelling doaj.art-62b127f22913403d9a6771cf5ceaa9962022-12-21T22:49:24ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEgyptian Journal of Anaesthesia1110-18492015-10-0131427728110.1016/j.egja.2015.03.009A controlled, double blind, study of adding Nalbuphine to Propofol for laryngeal mask insertion conditions and hemodynamics in adultsOssama Hamdy SalmanPurpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate laryngeal mask airway placement conditions achieved with Nalbuphine/Propofol combination when given intravenously as well as hemodynamic changes if any. Methods: 60 ASA grade 1 and 11 patients of age group 20–60 years, scheduled for general anesthesia with spontaneous breathing were randomly allocated to receive intravenously either Fentanyl 2 μg/kg, controlled group (Group F, n = 30) or Nalbuphine 0.2 mg/kg (Group N, n = 30), before induction of anesthesia with Propofol 2–2.5 mg/kg. Heart rate and arterial blood pressure were measured before induction of anesthesia and at 1, 3, and 5 min after LMA insertion. Assessment of LMA insertion was done using 6 variables: mouth opening, gagging, swallowing, head and limb movements, laryngospasm and resistance to insertion. Incidence and duration of apnea were recorded. Results: The incidence of coughing/gagging was higher in the F group (50%) compared to the N group (30%), (P = 0.019). Swallowing was also statistically significant (P = 0.017), being higher in F group (50%), compared to N group (16.6%). Limb moving followed the same pattern being higher in the F group (40%) compared to (13.3%) in the N group, (P = 0.008). Laryngospasm was seen in neither group. There was also statistically significant difference (P = 0.007) in the incidence of apnea between the control group (F) 86.6% and (N) group. Heart rate variation and MAP changes were not statistically significant in either F or N groups. Conclusion: The addition of Nalbuphine to Propofol for LMA insertion provides excellent insertion conditions with stable hemodynamics in adults.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110184915000549Laryngeal mask airway (LMA)American Society of Anesthetists (ASA)Mean arterial pressure (MAP)
spellingShingle Ossama Hamdy Salman
A controlled, double blind, study of adding Nalbuphine to Propofol for laryngeal mask insertion conditions and hemodynamics in adults
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Laryngeal mask airway (LMA)
American Society of Anesthetists (ASA)
Mean arterial pressure (MAP)
title A controlled, double blind, study of adding Nalbuphine to Propofol for laryngeal mask insertion conditions and hemodynamics in adults
title_full A controlled, double blind, study of adding Nalbuphine to Propofol for laryngeal mask insertion conditions and hemodynamics in adults
title_fullStr A controlled, double blind, study of adding Nalbuphine to Propofol for laryngeal mask insertion conditions and hemodynamics in adults
title_full_unstemmed A controlled, double blind, study of adding Nalbuphine to Propofol for laryngeal mask insertion conditions and hemodynamics in adults
title_short A controlled, double blind, study of adding Nalbuphine to Propofol for laryngeal mask insertion conditions and hemodynamics in adults
title_sort controlled double blind study of adding nalbuphine to propofol for laryngeal mask insertion conditions and hemodynamics in adults
topic Laryngeal mask airway (LMA)
American Society of Anesthetists (ASA)
Mean arterial pressure (MAP)
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110184915000549
work_keys_str_mv AT ossamahamdysalman acontrolleddoubleblindstudyofaddingnalbuphinetopropofolforlaryngealmaskinsertionconditionsandhemodynamicsinadults
AT ossamahamdysalman controlleddoubleblindstudyofaddingnalbuphinetopropofolforlaryngealmaskinsertionconditionsandhemodynamicsinadults