Improving peer review of systematic reviews by involving librarians and information specialists: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Abstract Background Problems continue to exist with the reporting quality and risk of bias in search methods and strategies in systematic reviews and related review types. Peer reviewers who are not familiar with what is required to transparently and fully report a search may not be prepared to revi...
Main Authors: | Melissa L. Rethlefsen, Sara Schroter, Lex M. Bouter, David Moher, Ana Patricia Ayala, Jamie J. Kirkham, Maurice P. Zeegers |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-11-01
|
Series: | Trials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05738-z |
Similar Items
-
Librarians and information specialists as methodological peer-reviewers: a case-study of the International Journal of Health Governance
by: Irina Ibragimova, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
The case of the disappearing librarians: analyzing documentation of librarians’ contributions to systematic reviews
by: Amelia Brunskill, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Problematizing Peer Review: Academic Librarians’ Pedagogical Approaches to Peer Review
by: Gr Keer, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
LIBRARIAN'S ROLE IN DENTISTRY SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: AN EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY
by: Karyn Munyk Lehmkuhl, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01) -
Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews
by: Deborah Meert, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)