Leveraging undergraduate learning assistants when implementing new laboratory curricula

At University of California, Irvine, a large-enrollment research university, undergraduate chemistry courses for non-chemistry majors were delivered remotely during the 2020–2021 academic year, with a return to in-person instruction planned for January 2022. Because this return to in-person instruct...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James H. Griffin, Jordan C. Thompson, Pía A. López, Renée D. Link
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1367087/full
_version_ 1797244839239090176
author James H. Griffin
Jordan C. Thompson
Pía A. López
Renée D. Link
author_facet James H. Griffin
Jordan C. Thompson
Pía A. López
Renée D. Link
author_sort James H. Griffin
collection DOAJ
description At University of California, Irvine, a large-enrollment research university, undergraduate chemistry courses for non-chemistry majors were delivered remotely during the 2020–2021 academic year, with a return to in-person instruction planned for January 2022. Because this return to in-person instruction coincided with the transition of second-year students from general chemistry to organic chemistry laboratory courses, the instructional staff recognized a need for remedial laboratory curricula for students with no prior in-person laboratory experience. Simultaneously, we desired to implement undergraduate Learning Assistants (LAs) in non-chemistry major organic chemistry laboratories for the first time at our university. In this paper, we describe our approach for leveraging undergraduate LAs to (1) test new laboratory curricula and (2) address feelings of comfort and safety for students with no prior in-person laboratory experience. Benefits of our LA program perceived by students include increased laboratory efficiency and improved student learning from near-peer instructors; benefits perceived by LAs include the development of professional skills and teamwork with graduate student teaching assistants. We provide an outline of resources and strategies to enable instructors to simultaneously implement undergraduate LAs and new laboratory curricula.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T19:17:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-62bfbf35a56d4eb3a97ad02c95b0d6ca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2504-284X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T19:17:23Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Education
spelling doaj.art-62bfbf35a56d4eb3a97ad02c95b0d6ca2024-03-26T04:36:03ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Education2504-284X2024-03-01910.3389/feduc.2024.13670871367087Leveraging undergraduate learning assistants when implementing new laboratory curriculaJames H. GriffinJordan C. ThompsonPía A. LópezRenée D. LinkAt University of California, Irvine, a large-enrollment research university, undergraduate chemistry courses for non-chemistry majors were delivered remotely during the 2020–2021 academic year, with a return to in-person instruction planned for January 2022. Because this return to in-person instruction coincided with the transition of second-year students from general chemistry to organic chemistry laboratory courses, the instructional staff recognized a need for remedial laboratory curricula for students with no prior in-person laboratory experience. Simultaneously, we desired to implement undergraduate Learning Assistants (LAs) in non-chemistry major organic chemistry laboratories for the first time at our university. In this paper, we describe our approach for leveraging undergraduate LAs to (1) test new laboratory curricula and (2) address feelings of comfort and safety for students with no prior in-person laboratory experience. Benefits of our LA program perceived by students include increased laboratory efficiency and improved student learning from near-peer instructors; benefits perceived by LAs include the development of professional skills and teamwork with graduate student teaching assistants. We provide an outline of resources and strategies to enable instructors to simultaneously implement undergraduate LAs and new laboratory curricula.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1367087/fulllearning assistantsorganic chemistry laboratorynear-peer assisted learningaffective domain in science educationstudent-centered learningcollaborative learning
spellingShingle James H. Griffin
Jordan C. Thompson
Pía A. López
Renée D. Link
Leveraging undergraduate learning assistants when implementing new laboratory curricula
Frontiers in Education
learning assistants
organic chemistry laboratory
near-peer assisted learning
affective domain in science education
student-centered learning
collaborative learning
title Leveraging undergraduate learning assistants when implementing new laboratory curricula
title_full Leveraging undergraduate learning assistants when implementing new laboratory curricula
title_fullStr Leveraging undergraduate learning assistants when implementing new laboratory curricula
title_full_unstemmed Leveraging undergraduate learning assistants when implementing new laboratory curricula
title_short Leveraging undergraduate learning assistants when implementing new laboratory curricula
title_sort leveraging undergraduate learning assistants when implementing new laboratory curricula
topic learning assistants
organic chemistry laboratory
near-peer assisted learning
affective domain in science education
student-centered learning
collaborative learning
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1367087/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jameshgriffin leveragingundergraduatelearningassistantswhenimplementingnewlaboratorycurricula
AT jordancthompson leveragingundergraduatelearningassistantswhenimplementingnewlaboratorycurricula
AT piaalopez leveragingundergraduatelearningassistantswhenimplementingnewlaboratorycurricula
AT reneedlink leveragingundergraduatelearningassistantswhenimplementingnewlaboratorycurricula