Differences in risk factors for surgical site infection between laparotomy and laparoscopy in gastrointestinal surgery.

Extensive gastrointestinal surgery surveillance data in Japan were analyzed to examine the differences in the risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) between laparotomy and laparoscopic abdominal procedures. Surgical procedures investigated in the study were gastrectomy, cholecystectomy, cole...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Momoe Utsumi, Terumasa Yamada, Kazuo Yamabe, Yoshiteru Katsura, Nariaki Fukuchi, Hiroki Fukunaga, Masahiro Tanemura, Junzo Shimizu, Yoshinori Kagawa, Shogo Kobayashi, Hidekazu Takahashi, Koji Tanaka, Tsunekazu Mizushima, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Nana Nakayama, Kiyoko Makimoto, Yuichiro Doki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274887
_version_ 1811229231727771648
author Momoe Utsumi
Terumasa Yamada
Kazuo Yamabe
Yoshiteru Katsura
Nariaki Fukuchi
Hiroki Fukunaga
Masahiro Tanemura
Junzo Shimizu
Yoshinori Kagawa
Shogo Kobayashi
Hidekazu Takahashi
Koji Tanaka
Tsunekazu Mizushima
Hidetoshi Eguchi
Nana Nakayama
Kiyoko Makimoto
Yuichiro Doki
author_facet Momoe Utsumi
Terumasa Yamada
Kazuo Yamabe
Yoshiteru Katsura
Nariaki Fukuchi
Hiroki Fukunaga
Masahiro Tanemura
Junzo Shimizu
Yoshinori Kagawa
Shogo Kobayashi
Hidekazu Takahashi
Koji Tanaka
Tsunekazu Mizushima
Hidetoshi Eguchi
Nana Nakayama
Kiyoko Makimoto
Yuichiro Doki
author_sort Momoe Utsumi
collection DOAJ
description Extensive gastrointestinal surgery surveillance data in Japan were analyzed to examine the differences in the risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) between laparotomy and laparoscopic abdominal procedures. Surgical procedures investigated in the study were gastrectomy, cholecystectomy, colectomy, rectal resection, and appendectomy. A total of 32,629 patients were included in the study. The study participants were divided into two groups according to the year of surgery, 2003-2009 (first study period) and 2010-2015 (second study period), due to the increase in the number of laparoscopic surgeries in the second study period. The incidence of SSI was stratified by three SSI classifications (superficial incisional, deep incisional, and organ/space SSI). Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to predict the risk factors for SSI. The percentage of laparoscopic surgeries performed has increased linearly since 2010. Patients in the second study period were significantly older and had a higher prevalence of SSI risk factors compared with those in the first study period. In addition, the predictive factors changed substantially in most surgical procedures between the two study periods. Wound class ≥ 3 was a ubiquitous risk factor for superficial incisional SSI (SI-SSI) and organ/space SSI (OS-SSI) in both open (laparotomy) and laparoscopic procedures in the first study period. Meanwhile, in the second study period, operative duration was a ubiquitous risk factor in both procedures. The risk factors for SI-SSI differed from those for OS-SSI in the five abdominal surgeries investigated in the study. Periodic examination of risk factors for SSI is recommended in an aging society.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T10:11:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-62ca457d7ba947148d96d15522061a43
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T10:11:04Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-62ca457d7ba947148d96d15522061a432022-12-22T03:37:18ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01179e027488710.1371/journal.pone.0274887Differences in risk factors for surgical site infection between laparotomy and laparoscopy in gastrointestinal surgery.Momoe UtsumiTerumasa YamadaKazuo YamabeYoshiteru KatsuraNariaki FukuchiHiroki FukunagaMasahiro TanemuraJunzo ShimizuYoshinori KagawaShogo KobayashiHidekazu TakahashiKoji TanakaTsunekazu MizushimaHidetoshi EguchiNana NakayamaKiyoko MakimotoYuichiro DokiExtensive gastrointestinal surgery surveillance data in Japan were analyzed to examine the differences in the risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) between laparotomy and laparoscopic abdominal procedures. Surgical procedures investigated in the study were gastrectomy, cholecystectomy, colectomy, rectal resection, and appendectomy. A total of 32,629 patients were included in the study. The study participants were divided into two groups according to the year of surgery, 2003-2009 (first study period) and 2010-2015 (second study period), due to the increase in the number of laparoscopic surgeries in the second study period. The incidence of SSI was stratified by three SSI classifications (superficial incisional, deep incisional, and organ/space SSI). Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to predict the risk factors for SSI. The percentage of laparoscopic surgeries performed has increased linearly since 2010. Patients in the second study period were significantly older and had a higher prevalence of SSI risk factors compared with those in the first study period. In addition, the predictive factors changed substantially in most surgical procedures between the two study periods. Wound class ≥ 3 was a ubiquitous risk factor for superficial incisional SSI (SI-SSI) and organ/space SSI (OS-SSI) in both open (laparotomy) and laparoscopic procedures in the first study period. Meanwhile, in the second study period, operative duration was a ubiquitous risk factor in both procedures. The risk factors for SI-SSI differed from those for OS-SSI in the five abdominal surgeries investigated in the study. Periodic examination of risk factors for SSI is recommended in an aging society.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274887
spellingShingle Momoe Utsumi
Terumasa Yamada
Kazuo Yamabe
Yoshiteru Katsura
Nariaki Fukuchi
Hiroki Fukunaga
Masahiro Tanemura
Junzo Shimizu
Yoshinori Kagawa
Shogo Kobayashi
Hidekazu Takahashi
Koji Tanaka
Tsunekazu Mizushima
Hidetoshi Eguchi
Nana Nakayama
Kiyoko Makimoto
Yuichiro Doki
Differences in risk factors for surgical site infection between laparotomy and laparoscopy in gastrointestinal surgery.
PLoS ONE
title Differences in risk factors for surgical site infection between laparotomy and laparoscopy in gastrointestinal surgery.
title_full Differences in risk factors for surgical site infection between laparotomy and laparoscopy in gastrointestinal surgery.
title_fullStr Differences in risk factors for surgical site infection between laparotomy and laparoscopy in gastrointestinal surgery.
title_full_unstemmed Differences in risk factors for surgical site infection between laparotomy and laparoscopy in gastrointestinal surgery.
title_short Differences in risk factors for surgical site infection between laparotomy and laparoscopy in gastrointestinal surgery.
title_sort differences in risk factors for surgical site infection between laparotomy and laparoscopy in gastrointestinal surgery
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274887
work_keys_str_mv AT momoeutsumi differencesinriskfactorsforsurgicalsiteinfectionbetweenlaparotomyandlaparoscopyingastrointestinalsurgery
AT terumasayamada differencesinriskfactorsforsurgicalsiteinfectionbetweenlaparotomyandlaparoscopyingastrointestinalsurgery
AT kazuoyamabe differencesinriskfactorsforsurgicalsiteinfectionbetweenlaparotomyandlaparoscopyingastrointestinalsurgery
AT yoshiterukatsura differencesinriskfactorsforsurgicalsiteinfectionbetweenlaparotomyandlaparoscopyingastrointestinalsurgery
AT nariakifukuchi differencesinriskfactorsforsurgicalsiteinfectionbetweenlaparotomyandlaparoscopyingastrointestinalsurgery
AT hirokifukunaga differencesinriskfactorsforsurgicalsiteinfectionbetweenlaparotomyandlaparoscopyingastrointestinalsurgery
AT masahirotanemura differencesinriskfactorsforsurgicalsiteinfectionbetweenlaparotomyandlaparoscopyingastrointestinalsurgery
AT junzoshimizu differencesinriskfactorsforsurgicalsiteinfectionbetweenlaparotomyandlaparoscopyingastrointestinalsurgery
AT yoshinorikagawa differencesinriskfactorsforsurgicalsiteinfectionbetweenlaparotomyandlaparoscopyingastrointestinalsurgery
AT shogokobayashi differencesinriskfactorsforsurgicalsiteinfectionbetweenlaparotomyandlaparoscopyingastrointestinalsurgery
AT hidekazutakahashi differencesinriskfactorsforsurgicalsiteinfectionbetweenlaparotomyandlaparoscopyingastrointestinalsurgery
AT kojitanaka differencesinriskfactorsforsurgicalsiteinfectionbetweenlaparotomyandlaparoscopyingastrointestinalsurgery
AT tsunekazumizushima differencesinriskfactorsforsurgicalsiteinfectionbetweenlaparotomyandlaparoscopyingastrointestinalsurgery
AT hidetoshieguchi differencesinriskfactorsforsurgicalsiteinfectionbetweenlaparotomyandlaparoscopyingastrointestinalsurgery
AT nananakayama differencesinriskfactorsforsurgicalsiteinfectionbetweenlaparotomyandlaparoscopyingastrointestinalsurgery
AT kiyokomakimoto differencesinriskfactorsforsurgicalsiteinfectionbetweenlaparotomyandlaparoscopyingastrointestinalsurgery
AT yuichirodoki differencesinriskfactorsforsurgicalsiteinfectionbetweenlaparotomyandlaparoscopyingastrointestinalsurgery