Balloon-borne stratospheric BrO measurements: comparison with Envisat/SCIAMACHY BrO limb profiles

For the first time, results of four stratospheric BrO profiling instruments, are presented and compared with reference to the SLIMCAT 3-dimensional chemical transport model (3-D CTM). Model calculations are used to infer a BrO profile validation set, measured by 3 different balloon sensors, for the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Dorf, H. Bösch, A. Butz, C. Camy-Peyret, M. P. Chipperfield, A. Engel, F. Goutail, K. Grunow, F. Hendrick, S. Hrechanyy, B. Naujokat, J.-P. Pommereau, M. Van Roozendael, C. Sioris, F. Stroh, F. Weidner, K. Pfeilsticker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2006-01-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/6/2483/2006/acp-6-2483-2006.pdf
_version_ 1818484296013316096
author M. Dorf
H. Bösch
H. Bösch
A. Butz
C. Camy-Peyret
M. P. Chipperfield
A. Engel
F. Goutail
K. Grunow
F. Hendrick
S. Hrechanyy
B. Naujokat
J.-P. Pommereau
M. Van Roozendael
C. Sioris
F. Stroh
F. Weidner
K. Pfeilsticker
author_facet M. Dorf
H. Bösch
H. Bösch
A. Butz
C. Camy-Peyret
M. P. Chipperfield
A. Engel
F. Goutail
K. Grunow
F. Hendrick
S. Hrechanyy
B. Naujokat
J.-P. Pommereau
M. Van Roozendael
C. Sioris
F. Stroh
F. Weidner
K. Pfeilsticker
author_sort M. Dorf
collection DOAJ
description For the first time, results of four stratospheric BrO profiling instruments, are presented and compared with reference to the SLIMCAT 3-dimensional chemical transport model (3-D CTM). Model calculations are used to infer a BrO profile validation set, measured by 3 different balloon sensors, for the new Envisat/SCIAMACHY (ENVIronment SATellite/SCanning Imaging Absorption spectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY) satellite instrument. The balloon observations include (a) balloon-borne in situ resonance fluorescence detection of BrO (Triple), (b) balloon-borne solar occultation DOAS measurements (Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy) of BrO in the UV, and (c) BrO profiling from the solar occultation SAOZ (Systeme d'Analyse par Observation Zenithale) balloon instrument. Since stratospheric BrO is subject to considerable diurnal variation and none of the measurements are performed close enough in time and space for a direct comparison, all balloon observations are considered with reference to outputs from the 3-D CTM. The referencing is performed by forward and backward air mass trajectory calculations to match the balloon with the satellite observations. The diurnal variation of BrO is considered by 1-D photochemical model calculation along the trajectories. The 1-D photochemical model is initialised with output data of the 3-D model with additional constraints on the vertical transport, the total amount and photochemistry of stratospheric bromine as given by the various balloon observations. Total [Br<sub>y</sub>]=(20.1&plusmn;2.5) pptv obtained from DOAS BrO observations at mid-latitudes in 2003, serves as an upper limit of the comparison. Most of the balloon observations agree with the photochemical model predictions within their given error estimates. First retrieval exercises of BrO limb profiling from the SCIAMACHY satellite instrument on average agree to around 20% with the photochemically-corrected balloon observations of the remote sensing instruments (SAOZ and DOAS). An exception is the in situ Triple profile, in which the balloon and satellite data mostly does not agree within the given errors. In general, the satellite measurements show systematically higher values below 25 km than the balloon data and a change in profile shape above about 25 km.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T15:53:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-62cae6f333524e269f537e2b0c0f94a1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T15:53:24Z
publishDate 2006-01-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-62cae6f333524e269f537e2b0c0f94a12022-12-22T01:42:43ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242006-01-016924832501Balloon-borne stratospheric BrO measurements: comparison with Envisat/SCIAMACHY BrO limb profilesM. DorfH. BöschH. BöschA. ButzC. Camy-PeyretM. P. ChipperfieldA. EngelF. GoutailK. GrunowF. HendrickS. HrechanyyB. NaujokatJ.-P. PommereauM. Van RoozendaelC. SiorisF. StrohF. WeidnerK. PfeilstickerFor the first time, results of four stratospheric BrO profiling instruments, are presented and compared with reference to the SLIMCAT 3-dimensional chemical transport model (3-D CTM). Model calculations are used to infer a BrO profile validation set, measured by 3 different balloon sensors, for the new Envisat/SCIAMACHY (ENVIronment SATellite/SCanning Imaging Absorption spectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY) satellite instrument. The balloon observations include (a) balloon-borne in situ resonance fluorescence detection of BrO (Triple), (b) balloon-borne solar occultation DOAS measurements (Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy) of BrO in the UV, and (c) BrO profiling from the solar occultation SAOZ (Systeme d'Analyse par Observation Zenithale) balloon instrument. Since stratospheric BrO is subject to considerable diurnal variation and none of the measurements are performed close enough in time and space for a direct comparison, all balloon observations are considered with reference to outputs from the 3-D CTM. The referencing is performed by forward and backward air mass trajectory calculations to match the balloon with the satellite observations. The diurnal variation of BrO is considered by 1-D photochemical model calculation along the trajectories. The 1-D photochemical model is initialised with output data of the 3-D model with additional constraints on the vertical transport, the total amount and photochemistry of stratospheric bromine as given by the various balloon observations. Total [Br<sub>y</sub>]=(20.1&plusmn;2.5) pptv obtained from DOAS BrO observations at mid-latitudes in 2003, serves as an upper limit of the comparison. Most of the balloon observations agree with the photochemical model predictions within their given error estimates. First retrieval exercises of BrO limb profiling from the SCIAMACHY satellite instrument on average agree to around 20% with the photochemically-corrected balloon observations of the remote sensing instruments (SAOZ and DOAS). An exception is the in situ Triple profile, in which the balloon and satellite data mostly does not agree within the given errors. In general, the satellite measurements show systematically higher values below 25 km than the balloon data and a change in profile shape above about 25 km.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/6/2483/2006/acp-6-2483-2006.pdf
spellingShingle M. Dorf
H. Bösch
H. Bösch
A. Butz
C. Camy-Peyret
M. P. Chipperfield
A. Engel
F. Goutail
K. Grunow
F. Hendrick
S. Hrechanyy
B. Naujokat
J.-P. Pommereau
M. Van Roozendael
C. Sioris
F. Stroh
F. Weidner
K. Pfeilsticker
Balloon-borne stratospheric BrO measurements: comparison with Envisat/SCIAMACHY BrO limb profiles
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Balloon-borne stratospheric BrO measurements: comparison with Envisat/SCIAMACHY BrO limb profiles
title_full Balloon-borne stratospheric BrO measurements: comparison with Envisat/SCIAMACHY BrO limb profiles
title_fullStr Balloon-borne stratospheric BrO measurements: comparison with Envisat/SCIAMACHY BrO limb profiles
title_full_unstemmed Balloon-borne stratospheric BrO measurements: comparison with Envisat/SCIAMACHY BrO limb profiles
title_short Balloon-borne stratospheric BrO measurements: comparison with Envisat/SCIAMACHY BrO limb profiles
title_sort balloon borne stratospheric bro measurements comparison with envisat sciamachy bro limb profiles
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/6/2483/2006/acp-6-2483-2006.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mdorf balloonbornestratosphericbromeasurementscomparisonwithenvisatsciamachybrolimbprofiles
AT hbosch balloonbornestratosphericbromeasurementscomparisonwithenvisatsciamachybrolimbprofiles
AT hbosch balloonbornestratosphericbromeasurementscomparisonwithenvisatsciamachybrolimbprofiles
AT abutz balloonbornestratosphericbromeasurementscomparisonwithenvisatsciamachybrolimbprofiles
AT ccamypeyret balloonbornestratosphericbromeasurementscomparisonwithenvisatsciamachybrolimbprofiles
AT mpchipperfield balloonbornestratosphericbromeasurementscomparisonwithenvisatsciamachybrolimbprofiles
AT aengel balloonbornestratosphericbromeasurementscomparisonwithenvisatsciamachybrolimbprofiles
AT fgoutail balloonbornestratosphericbromeasurementscomparisonwithenvisatsciamachybrolimbprofiles
AT kgrunow balloonbornestratosphericbromeasurementscomparisonwithenvisatsciamachybrolimbprofiles
AT fhendrick balloonbornestratosphericbromeasurementscomparisonwithenvisatsciamachybrolimbprofiles
AT shrechanyy balloonbornestratosphericbromeasurementscomparisonwithenvisatsciamachybrolimbprofiles
AT bnaujokat balloonbornestratosphericbromeasurementscomparisonwithenvisatsciamachybrolimbprofiles
AT jppommereau balloonbornestratosphericbromeasurementscomparisonwithenvisatsciamachybrolimbprofiles
AT mvanroozendael balloonbornestratosphericbromeasurementscomparisonwithenvisatsciamachybrolimbprofiles
AT csioris balloonbornestratosphericbromeasurementscomparisonwithenvisatsciamachybrolimbprofiles
AT fstroh balloonbornestratosphericbromeasurementscomparisonwithenvisatsciamachybrolimbprofiles
AT fweidner balloonbornestratosphericbromeasurementscomparisonwithenvisatsciamachybrolimbprofiles
AT kpfeilsticker balloonbornestratosphericbromeasurementscomparisonwithenvisatsciamachybrolimbprofiles