Interorganizational Relationships Within State Tobacco Control Networks: A Social Network Analysis

Introduction State tobacco control programs are implemented by networks of public and private agencies with a common goal to reduce tobacco use. The degree of a programs comprehensiveness depends on the scope of its activities and the variety of agencies involved in the network. Structural aspects...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Melissa Krauss, Nancy Mueller, Douglas Luke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2004-10-01
Series:Preventing Chronic Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2004/oct/04_0041.htm
_version_ 1797429013204959232
author Melissa Krauss
Nancy Mueller
Douglas Luke
author_facet Melissa Krauss
Nancy Mueller
Douglas Luke
author_sort Melissa Krauss
collection DOAJ
description Introduction State tobacco control programs are implemented by networks of public and private agencies with a common goal to reduce tobacco use. The degree of a programs comprehensiveness depends on the scope of its activities and the variety of agencies involved in the network. Structural aspects of these networks could help describe the process of implementing a states tobacco control program, but have not yet been examined. Methods Social network analysis was used to examine the structure of five state tobacco control networks. Semi-structured interviews with key agencies collected quantitative and qualitative data on frequency of contact among network partners, money flow, relationship productivity, level of network effectiveness, and methods for improvement. Results Most states had hierarchical communication structures in which partner agencies had frequent contact with one or two central agencies. Lead agencies had the highest control over network communication. Networks with denser communication structures had denser productivity structures. Lead agencies had the highest financial influence within the networks, while statewide coalitions were financially influenced by others. Lead agencies had highly productive relationships with others, while agencies with narrow roles had fewer productive relationships. Statewide coalitions that received Robert Wood Johnson Foundation funding had more highly productive relationships than coalitions that did not receive the funding. Conclusion Results suggest that frequent communication among network partners is related to more highly productive relationships. Results also highlight the importance of lead agencies and statewide coalitions in implementing a comprehensive state tobacco control program. Network analysis could be useful in developing process indicators for state tobacco control programs.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T09:07:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-62d355dcfc3c4f579604310c13db04ae
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1545-1151
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T09:07:03Z
publishDate 2004-10-01
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format Article
series Preventing Chronic Disease
spelling doaj.art-62d355dcfc3c4f579604310c13db04ae2023-12-02T10:00:06ZengCenters for Disease Control and PreventionPreventing Chronic Disease1545-11512004-10-0114Interorganizational Relationships Within State Tobacco Control Networks: A Social Network AnalysisMelissa KraussNancy MuellerDouglas LukeIntroduction State tobacco control programs are implemented by networks of public and private agencies with a common goal to reduce tobacco use. The degree of a programs comprehensiveness depends on the scope of its activities and the variety of agencies involved in the network. Structural aspects of these networks could help describe the process of implementing a states tobacco control program, but have not yet been examined. Methods Social network analysis was used to examine the structure of five state tobacco control networks. Semi-structured interviews with key agencies collected quantitative and qualitative data on frequency of contact among network partners, money flow, relationship productivity, level of network effectiveness, and methods for improvement. Results Most states had hierarchical communication structures in which partner agencies had frequent contact with one or two central agencies. Lead agencies had the highest control over network communication. Networks with denser communication structures had denser productivity structures. Lead agencies had the highest financial influence within the networks, while statewide coalitions were financially influenced by others. Lead agencies had highly productive relationships with others, while agencies with narrow roles had fewer productive relationships. Statewide coalitions that received Robert Wood Johnson Foundation funding had more highly productive relationships than coalitions that did not receive the funding. Conclusion Results suggest that frequent communication among network partners is related to more highly productive relationships. Results also highlight the importance of lead agencies and statewide coalitions in implementing a comprehensive state tobacco control program. Network analysis could be useful in developing process indicators for state tobacco control programs.http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2004/oct/04_0041.htmtobaccosocial network analysischronic disease
spellingShingle Melissa Krauss
Nancy Mueller
Douglas Luke
Interorganizational Relationships Within State Tobacco Control Networks: A Social Network Analysis
Preventing Chronic Disease
tobacco
social network analysis
chronic disease
title Interorganizational Relationships Within State Tobacco Control Networks: A Social Network Analysis
title_full Interorganizational Relationships Within State Tobacco Control Networks: A Social Network Analysis
title_fullStr Interorganizational Relationships Within State Tobacco Control Networks: A Social Network Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Interorganizational Relationships Within State Tobacco Control Networks: A Social Network Analysis
title_short Interorganizational Relationships Within State Tobacco Control Networks: A Social Network Analysis
title_sort interorganizational relationships within state tobacco control networks a social network analysis
topic tobacco
social network analysis
chronic disease
url http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2004/oct/04_0041.htm
work_keys_str_mv AT melissakrauss interorganizationalrelationshipswithinstatetobaccocontrolnetworksasocialnetworkanalysis
AT nancymueller interorganizationalrelationshipswithinstatetobaccocontrolnetworksasocialnetworkanalysis
AT douglasluke interorganizationalrelationshipswithinstatetobaccocontrolnetworksasocialnetworkanalysis