Charging Complicity in Abuses, Ignoring Beneficial Engagement: How American Conservatives Secured the Blocking of U.S. Funds for the UNFPA by Misrepresenting the UN’s Efforts to Reform China’s One-Child Policy
We describe a key moment during the world’s attempt to come to terms with enormously expanding populations. China was an extreme case, both in the magnitude of its population explosion and in its government’s control of reproduction through the One-Child Policy (OCP). The U.S. had been a founder and...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-05-01
|
| Series: | Histories |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9252/3/2/10 |
| _version_ | 1797594521334185984 |
|---|---|
| author | Guigui Yao Derek Hoff Robert J. Wyman |
| author_facet | Guigui Yao Derek Hoff Robert J. Wyman |
| author_sort | Guigui Yao |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | We describe a key moment during the world’s attempt to come to terms with enormously expanding populations. China was an extreme case, both in the magnitude of its population explosion and in its government’s control of reproduction through the One-Child Policy (OCP). The U.S. had been a founder and the main financial supporter of The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Starting in 1998, UNFPA’s program in China attempted to move the OCP away from two decades of coercive family planning and toward acceptance of the women’s rights–centered global consensus that emerged from the 1994 Cairo Conference on Population and Development. In 2001, a conservative U.S. organization, the Population Research Institute, claimed to have gathered evidence of UNFPA’s involvement in Chinese coercion. Although several investigations, including one sent by President George W. Bush himself, refuted this evidence, and UNFPA had used no U.S. funds in China, conservative political power was sufficient to cause President George W. Bush to eliminate all U.S. funding for UNFPA’s activities everywhere in the world. Ironically, this period was exactly when the UNFPA project had shown that coercion was unnecessary. China eventually followed the UNFPA’s lead, liberalizing and eventually ending the OCP. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T02:24:26Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-62df4fe8f275465aaf873b7684282683 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2409-9252 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T02:24:26Z |
| publishDate | 2023-05-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Histories |
| spelling | doaj.art-62df4fe8f275465aaf873b76842826832023-11-18T10:40:08ZengMDPI AGHistories2409-92522023-05-013212915510.3390/histories3020010Charging Complicity in Abuses, Ignoring Beneficial Engagement: How American Conservatives Secured the Blocking of U.S. Funds for the UNFPA by Misrepresenting the UN’s Efforts to Reform China’s One-Child PolicyGuigui Yao0Derek Hoff1Robert J. Wyman2Center for American Culture Studies and School of Foreign Languages, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430014, ChinaDavid Eccles School of Business, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USAMCDB, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USAWe describe a key moment during the world’s attempt to come to terms with enormously expanding populations. China was an extreme case, both in the magnitude of its population explosion and in its government’s control of reproduction through the One-Child Policy (OCP). The U.S. had been a founder and the main financial supporter of The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Starting in 1998, UNFPA’s program in China attempted to move the OCP away from two decades of coercive family planning and toward acceptance of the women’s rights–centered global consensus that emerged from the 1994 Cairo Conference on Population and Development. In 2001, a conservative U.S. organization, the Population Research Institute, claimed to have gathered evidence of UNFPA’s involvement in Chinese coercion. Although several investigations, including one sent by President George W. Bush himself, refuted this evidence, and UNFPA had used no U.S. funds in China, conservative political power was sufficient to cause President George W. Bush to eliminate all U.S. funding for UNFPA’s activities everywhere in the world. Ironically, this period was exactly when the UNFPA project had shown that coercion was unnecessary. China eventually followed the UNFPA’s lead, liberalizing and eventually ending the OCP.https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9252/3/2/10one-child policyChinaUnited Nations Population FundSteven W. MosherPopulation Research InstituteGeorge W. Bush |
| spellingShingle | Guigui Yao Derek Hoff Robert J. Wyman Charging Complicity in Abuses, Ignoring Beneficial Engagement: How American Conservatives Secured the Blocking of U.S. Funds for the UNFPA by Misrepresenting the UN’s Efforts to Reform China’s One-Child Policy Histories one-child policy China United Nations Population Fund Steven W. Mosher Population Research Institute George W. Bush |
| title | Charging Complicity in Abuses, Ignoring Beneficial Engagement: How American Conservatives Secured the Blocking of U.S. Funds for the UNFPA by Misrepresenting the UN’s Efforts to Reform China’s One-Child Policy |
| title_full | Charging Complicity in Abuses, Ignoring Beneficial Engagement: How American Conservatives Secured the Blocking of U.S. Funds for the UNFPA by Misrepresenting the UN’s Efforts to Reform China’s One-Child Policy |
| title_fullStr | Charging Complicity in Abuses, Ignoring Beneficial Engagement: How American Conservatives Secured the Blocking of U.S. Funds for the UNFPA by Misrepresenting the UN’s Efforts to Reform China’s One-Child Policy |
| title_full_unstemmed | Charging Complicity in Abuses, Ignoring Beneficial Engagement: How American Conservatives Secured the Blocking of U.S. Funds for the UNFPA by Misrepresenting the UN’s Efforts to Reform China’s One-Child Policy |
| title_short | Charging Complicity in Abuses, Ignoring Beneficial Engagement: How American Conservatives Secured the Blocking of U.S. Funds for the UNFPA by Misrepresenting the UN’s Efforts to Reform China’s One-Child Policy |
| title_sort | charging complicity in abuses ignoring beneficial engagement how american conservatives secured the blocking of u s funds for the unfpa by misrepresenting the un s efforts to reform china s one child policy |
| topic | one-child policy China United Nations Population Fund Steven W. Mosher Population Research Institute George W. Bush |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9252/3/2/10 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT guiguiyao chargingcomplicityinabusesignoringbeneficialengagementhowamericanconservativessecuredtheblockingofusfundsfortheunfpabymisrepresentingtheunseffortstoreformchinasonechildpolicy AT derekhoff chargingcomplicityinabusesignoringbeneficialengagementhowamericanconservativessecuredtheblockingofusfundsfortheunfpabymisrepresentingtheunseffortstoreformchinasonechildpolicy AT robertjwyman chargingcomplicityinabusesignoringbeneficialengagementhowamericanconservativessecuredtheblockingofusfundsfortheunfpabymisrepresentingtheunseffortstoreformchinasonechildpolicy |