Empirical Bayesian Estimation of the Interferometric SAR Coherence Magnitude

SAR interferometry has developed rapidly in recent years and now allows measurements of subtle deformation of the Earth's surface with millimeter accuracy. All state-of-the-art processing methods require a precise coherence estimate. However, this estimate is a random variable and biased...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nico Adam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2022-01-01
Series:IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9835014/
_version_ 1818497349835554816
author Nico Adam
author_facet Nico Adam
author_sort Nico Adam
collection DOAJ
description SAR interferometry has developed rapidly in recent years and now allows measurements of subtle deformation of the Earth&#x0027;s surface with millimeter accuracy. All state-of-the-art processing methods require a precise coherence estimate. However, this estimate is a random variable and biased toward higher values. Up to now, little is published on the Bayesian estimation of the degree of coherence. The objective of the article is to develop empirical Bayesian estimators and to assess their characteristics by simulations. Bayesian estimation is understood as a regularization of the maximum likelihood estimation. The more information is used and the stricter the general prior, the more accurate the estimate will be. Three levels of prior information are developed: (1) an uninformative prior and an informative prior which can be implemented as (2a) less strict prior and (2b) strict prior. The informative priors are described by a single parameter only i.e., the maximum underlaying coherence. The article reports on the bias, the standard deviation and the root-mean-square error of the developed estimators. It was found that all empirical Bayes estimators improve the coherence estimation from small samples and for small underlaying coherences compared to the conventional sample estimator, e.g., a zero underlaying coherence is estimated by the expected <italic>a posteriori</italic> estimator without additional information with a 33.3&#x0025; reduced bias using three samples only. Assuming the maximum underlaying coherence is 0.6, the bias is reduced by 51.3&#x0025; for the strict prior and by 36.6&#x0025; for the less strict prior. In addition, it was found that the methods work very well even for the extremely small sample size of only two values.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T18:44:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-62e34fa37ed04e43b82b681b52132ef1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2151-1535
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T18:44:33Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher IEEE
record_format Article
series IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-62e34fa37ed04e43b82b681b52132ef12022-12-22T01:37:32ZengIEEEIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing2151-15352022-01-01156306632310.1109/JSTARS.2022.31928949835014Empirical Bayesian Estimation of the Interferometric SAR Coherence MagnitudeNico Adam0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6053-0105German Aerospace Center (DLR), Wessling, GermanySAR interferometry has developed rapidly in recent years and now allows measurements of subtle deformation of the Earth&#x0027;s surface with millimeter accuracy. All state-of-the-art processing methods require a precise coherence estimate. However, this estimate is a random variable and biased toward higher values. Up to now, little is published on the Bayesian estimation of the degree of coherence. The objective of the article is to develop empirical Bayesian estimators and to assess their characteristics by simulations. Bayesian estimation is understood as a regularization of the maximum likelihood estimation. The more information is used and the stricter the general prior, the more accurate the estimate will be. Three levels of prior information are developed: (1) an uninformative prior and an informative prior which can be implemented as (2a) less strict prior and (2b) strict prior. The informative priors are described by a single parameter only i.e., the maximum underlaying coherence. The article reports on the bias, the standard deviation and the root-mean-square error of the developed estimators. It was found that all empirical Bayes estimators improve the coherence estimation from small samples and for small underlaying coherences compared to the conventional sample estimator, e.g., a zero underlaying coherence is estimated by the expected <italic>a posteriori</italic> estimator without additional information with a 33.3&#x0025; reduced bias using three samples only. Assuming the maximum underlaying coherence is 0.6, the bias is reduced by 51.3&#x0025; for the strict prior and by 36.6&#x0025; for the less strict prior. In addition, it was found that the methods work very well even for the extremely small sample size of only two values.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9835014/Bayesian inferencecoherence magnitudedegree of coherencedistributed scatterers in SqueeSAR or CESAR or phase linkingempirical Bayes methodExpected <named-content xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" content-type="math" xlink:type="simple"> <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$a \, posteriori$</tex-math> </inline-formula> </named-content> (EAP) estimation
spellingShingle Nico Adam
Empirical Bayesian Estimation of the Interferometric SAR Coherence Magnitude
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Bayesian inference
coherence magnitude
degree of coherence
distributed scatterers in SqueeSAR or CESAR or phase linking
empirical Bayes method
Expected <named-content xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" content-type="math" xlink:type="simple"> <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$a \, posteriori$</tex-math> </inline-formula> </named-content> (EAP) estimation
title Empirical Bayesian Estimation of the Interferometric SAR Coherence Magnitude
title_full Empirical Bayesian Estimation of the Interferometric SAR Coherence Magnitude
title_fullStr Empirical Bayesian Estimation of the Interferometric SAR Coherence Magnitude
title_full_unstemmed Empirical Bayesian Estimation of the Interferometric SAR Coherence Magnitude
title_short Empirical Bayesian Estimation of the Interferometric SAR Coherence Magnitude
title_sort empirical bayesian estimation of the interferometric sar coherence magnitude
topic Bayesian inference
coherence magnitude
degree of coherence
distributed scatterers in SqueeSAR or CESAR or phase linking
empirical Bayes method
Expected <named-content xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" content-type="math" xlink:type="simple"> <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$a \, posteriori$</tex-math> </inline-formula> </named-content> (EAP) estimation
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9835014/
work_keys_str_mv AT nicoadam empiricalbayesianestimationoftheinterferometricsarcoherencemagnitude