Word, Image, and (Re)Production in Francis Picabia’s Mechanically Inspired Abstractions
Francis Picabia’s <i>Bobinage</i> (<i>Bobbin</i>, <i>Winding</i> or <i>Coil</i>) is a pencil and ink work produced on gouache-painted paper between 1921–1922. The free-floating forms in this piece appear, at first glance, to be studies in geometric abs...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-11-01
|
| Series: | Arts |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/12/6/231 |
| _version_ | 1827575688089042944 |
|---|---|
| author | Stephanie Chadwick |
| author_facet | Stephanie Chadwick |
| author_sort | Stephanie Chadwick |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Francis Picabia’s <i>Bobinage</i> (<i>Bobbin</i>, <i>Winding</i> or <i>Coil</i>) is a pencil and ink work produced on gouache-painted paper between 1921–1922. The free-floating forms in this piece appear, at first glance, to be studies in geometric abstraction. Yet, they, and the work’s title, make both semiotic and real-world references. The admixture of perspectives is notable, for it retains traces of the Cubist visual language that motivated Picabia and his peers as well as the imagery of the early twentieth-century technical diagrams that, as has been demonstrated by scholars, inspired his work. Examining <i>Coil</i> and other of Picabia’s artworks in tandem with the scholarship that has investigated these influences, this article explores the artist’s engagement with the very issue of representation. Through this investigation, this paper considers the ways in which Picabia’s work alludes to gender in a manner that privileges masculinity yet calls attention to the destabilizing effects of modernity—and modern representations—on notions about gender and, even, what it means to be human. Contextualized thusly, <i>Coil</i> represents not an abstract divergence but rather a continuation of the artist’s technical, gender, and, one could say, even cyborg investigations, revealing his engagement with new and innovative ways of perceiving, conceiving, and depicting modern experience. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T21:00:34Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-62ec93077ef243df8ddb470059ee1c18 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2076-0752 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T21:00:34Z |
| publishDate | 2023-11-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Arts |
| spelling | doaj.art-62ec93077ef243df8ddb470059ee1c182023-12-22T13:52:27ZengMDPI AGArts2076-07522023-11-0112623110.3390/arts12060231Word, Image, and (Re)Production in Francis Picabia’s Mechanically Inspired AbstractionsStephanie Chadwick0Department of Art & Design, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX 77710, USAFrancis Picabia’s <i>Bobinage</i> (<i>Bobbin</i>, <i>Winding</i> or <i>Coil</i>) is a pencil and ink work produced on gouache-painted paper between 1921–1922. The free-floating forms in this piece appear, at first glance, to be studies in geometric abstraction. Yet, they, and the work’s title, make both semiotic and real-world references. The admixture of perspectives is notable, for it retains traces of the Cubist visual language that motivated Picabia and his peers as well as the imagery of the early twentieth-century technical diagrams that, as has been demonstrated by scholars, inspired his work. Examining <i>Coil</i> and other of Picabia’s artworks in tandem with the scholarship that has investigated these influences, this article explores the artist’s engagement with the very issue of representation. Through this investigation, this paper considers the ways in which Picabia’s work alludes to gender in a manner that privileges masculinity yet calls attention to the destabilizing effects of modernity—and modern representations—on notions about gender and, even, what it means to be human. Contextualized thusly, <i>Coil</i> represents not an abstract divergence but rather a continuation of the artist’s technical, gender, and, one could say, even cyborg investigations, revealing his engagement with new and innovative ways of perceiving, conceiving, and depicting modern experience.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/12/6/231PicabiaDuchampDadaMechanomorphsModernismCubism |
| spellingShingle | Stephanie Chadwick Word, Image, and (Re)Production in Francis Picabia’s Mechanically Inspired Abstractions Arts Picabia Duchamp Dada Mechanomorphs Modernism Cubism |
| title | Word, Image, and (Re)Production in Francis Picabia’s Mechanically Inspired Abstractions |
| title_full | Word, Image, and (Re)Production in Francis Picabia’s Mechanically Inspired Abstractions |
| title_fullStr | Word, Image, and (Re)Production in Francis Picabia’s Mechanically Inspired Abstractions |
| title_full_unstemmed | Word, Image, and (Re)Production in Francis Picabia’s Mechanically Inspired Abstractions |
| title_short | Word, Image, and (Re)Production in Francis Picabia’s Mechanically Inspired Abstractions |
| title_sort | word image and re production in francis picabia s mechanically inspired abstractions |
| topic | Picabia Duchamp Dada Mechanomorphs Modernism Cubism |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/12/6/231 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stephaniechadwick wordimageandreproductioninfrancispicabiasmechanicallyinspiredabstractions |