High levels of pesticides found in illicit cannabis inflorescence compared to licensed samples in Canadian study using expanded 327 pesticides multiresidue method

Abstract Background As Cannabis was legalised in Canada for recreational use in 2018 with the implementation of the Cannabis Act, Regulations were put in place to ensure safety and consistency across the cannabis industry. This includes the requirement for licence holders to demonstrate that no unau...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mathieu Gagnon, Tyler McRitchie, Kim Montsion, Josée Tully, Michel Blais, Neil Snider, David R. Blais
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-08-01
Series:Journal of Cannabis Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-023-00200-0
_version_ 1797451608367300608
author Mathieu Gagnon
Tyler McRitchie
Kim Montsion
Josée Tully
Michel Blais
Neil Snider
David R. Blais
author_facet Mathieu Gagnon
Tyler McRitchie
Kim Montsion
Josée Tully
Michel Blais
Neil Snider
David R. Blais
author_sort Mathieu Gagnon
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background As Cannabis was legalised in Canada for recreational use in 2018 with the implementation of the Cannabis Act, Regulations were put in place to ensure safety and consistency across the cannabis industry. This includes the requirement for licence holders to demonstrate that no unauthorized pesticides are used to treat cannabis or have contaminated it. In this study, we describe an expanded 327 multi-residue pesticide analysis in cannabis inflorescence to confirm if the implementation of the Cannabis Act is providing safer licensed products to Canadians in comparison to those of the illicit market. Methods An extensive multi-residue method was developed using a modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) sample preparation method using a combination of gas chromatography—triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (GC–MS/MS) and liquid chromatography—triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) for the simultaneous quantification of 327 pesticide active ingredients in cannabis inflorescence. Results Application of this method to Canadian licensed inflorescence samples revealed a 6% sample positivity rate with only two pesticide residues detected, myclobutanil, and dichlobenil, at the method’s lowest calibrated level (LCL) of 0.01 μg/g. Canadian illicit cannabis inflorescence samples analysed showed a striking contrast with a 92% sample positivity rate covering 23 unique pesticide active ingredients with 3.7 different pesticides identified on average per sample. Chlorpyrifos, imidacloprid, and myclobutanil were measured in illicit samples at concentrations up to three orders of magnitude above the method LCL of 0.01 μg/g. Conclusion These results demonstrate the need of an extensive multiresidue method capable of analysing hundreds of pesticides simultaneously, to generate data for future policy and regulatory decision-making, and to enable Canadians to make safe cannabis choices.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T14:57:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-62eec19ed60d4c03b820316c784cd023
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2522-5782
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T14:57:06Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Cannabis Research
spelling doaj.art-62eec19ed60d4c03b820316c784cd0232023-11-26T14:07:35ZengBMCJournal of Cannabis Research2522-57822023-08-01511710.1186/s42238-023-00200-0High levels of pesticides found in illicit cannabis inflorescence compared to licensed samples in Canadian study using expanded 327 pesticides multiresidue methodMathieu Gagnon0Tyler McRitchie1Kim Montsion2Josée Tully3Michel Blais4Neil Snider5David R. Blais6Pesticide Laboratory, Regulatory Operations and Enforcement Branch, Health CanadaPesticide Laboratory, Regulatory Operations and Enforcement Branch, Health CanadaPesticide Laboratory, Regulatory Operations and Enforcement Branch, Health CanadaPesticide Laboratory, Regulatory Operations and Enforcement Branch, Health CanadaPesticide Laboratory, Regulatory Operations and Enforcement Branch, Health CanadaPesticide Laboratory, Regulatory Operations and Enforcement Branch, Health CanadaPesticide Laboratory, Regulatory Operations and Enforcement Branch, Health CanadaAbstract Background As Cannabis was legalised in Canada for recreational use in 2018 with the implementation of the Cannabis Act, Regulations were put in place to ensure safety and consistency across the cannabis industry. This includes the requirement for licence holders to demonstrate that no unauthorized pesticides are used to treat cannabis or have contaminated it. In this study, we describe an expanded 327 multi-residue pesticide analysis in cannabis inflorescence to confirm if the implementation of the Cannabis Act is providing safer licensed products to Canadians in comparison to those of the illicit market. Methods An extensive multi-residue method was developed using a modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) sample preparation method using a combination of gas chromatography—triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (GC–MS/MS) and liquid chromatography—triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) for the simultaneous quantification of 327 pesticide active ingredients in cannabis inflorescence. Results Application of this method to Canadian licensed inflorescence samples revealed a 6% sample positivity rate with only two pesticide residues detected, myclobutanil, and dichlobenil, at the method’s lowest calibrated level (LCL) of 0.01 μg/g. Canadian illicit cannabis inflorescence samples analysed showed a striking contrast with a 92% sample positivity rate covering 23 unique pesticide active ingredients with 3.7 different pesticides identified on average per sample. Chlorpyrifos, imidacloprid, and myclobutanil were measured in illicit samples at concentrations up to three orders of magnitude above the method LCL of 0.01 μg/g. Conclusion These results demonstrate the need of an extensive multiresidue method capable of analysing hundreds of pesticides simultaneously, to generate data for future policy and regulatory decision-making, and to enable Canadians to make safe cannabis choices.https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-023-00200-0QuEChERSGas chromatography–triple quadrupole mass spectrometryLiquid chromatography–triple quadrupole mass spectrometryCannabis inflorescencePesticidesLicensed versus Illicit
spellingShingle Mathieu Gagnon
Tyler McRitchie
Kim Montsion
Josée Tully
Michel Blais
Neil Snider
David R. Blais
High levels of pesticides found in illicit cannabis inflorescence compared to licensed samples in Canadian study using expanded 327 pesticides multiresidue method
Journal of Cannabis Research
QuEChERS
Gas chromatography–triple quadrupole mass spectrometry
Liquid chromatography–triple quadrupole mass spectrometry
Cannabis inflorescence
Pesticides
Licensed versus Illicit
title High levels of pesticides found in illicit cannabis inflorescence compared to licensed samples in Canadian study using expanded 327 pesticides multiresidue method
title_full High levels of pesticides found in illicit cannabis inflorescence compared to licensed samples in Canadian study using expanded 327 pesticides multiresidue method
title_fullStr High levels of pesticides found in illicit cannabis inflorescence compared to licensed samples in Canadian study using expanded 327 pesticides multiresidue method
title_full_unstemmed High levels of pesticides found in illicit cannabis inflorescence compared to licensed samples in Canadian study using expanded 327 pesticides multiresidue method
title_short High levels of pesticides found in illicit cannabis inflorescence compared to licensed samples in Canadian study using expanded 327 pesticides multiresidue method
title_sort high levels of pesticides found in illicit cannabis inflorescence compared to licensed samples in canadian study using expanded 327 pesticides multiresidue method
topic QuEChERS
Gas chromatography–triple quadrupole mass spectrometry
Liquid chromatography–triple quadrupole mass spectrometry
Cannabis inflorescence
Pesticides
Licensed versus Illicit
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-023-00200-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mathieugagnon highlevelsofpesticidesfoundinillicitcannabisinflorescencecomparedtolicensedsamplesincanadianstudyusingexpanded327pesticidesmultiresiduemethod
AT tylermcritchie highlevelsofpesticidesfoundinillicitcannabisinflorescencecomparedtolicensedsamplesincanadianstudyusingexpanded327pesticidesmultiresiduemethod
AT kimmontsion highlevelsofpesticidesfoundinillicitcannabisinflorescencecomparedtolicensedsamplesincanadianstudyusingexpanded327pesticidesmultiresiduemethod
AT joseetully highlevelsofpesticidesfoundinillicitcannabisinflorescencecomparedtolicensedsamplesincanadianstudyusingexpanded327pesticidesmultiresiduemethod
AT michelblais highlevelsofpesticidesfoundinillicitcannabisinflorescencecomparedtolicensedsamplesincanadianstudyusingexpanded327pesticidesmultiresiduemethod
AT neilsnider highlevelsofpesticidesfoundinillicitcannabisinflorescencecomparedtolicensedsamplesincanadianstudyusingexpanded327pesticidesmultiresiduemethod
AT davidrblais highlevelsofpesticidesfoundinillicitcannabisinflorescencecomparedtolicensedsamplesincanadianstudyusingexpanded327pesticidesmultiresiduemethod