A Survey on Distractors in Multiple-choice Questions and its Relationship on Difficulty and Discriminative Indices

Introduction: The distractors have a very important role in Multiple-Choice Question (MCQ) and it can influence the quality of the tests. This study aimed to investigate frequency of functioning and non-functioning distractors and the relationship between the distractors options with difficulty and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abdolhussein Shakurnia
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Medical Education Development Center 2019-04-01
Series:مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-4776-en.pdf
_version_ 1797638169208815616
author Abdolhussein Shakurnia
author_facet Abdolhussein Shakurnia
author_sort Abdolhussein Shakurnia
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The distractors have a very important role in Multiple-Choice Question (MCQ) and it can influence the quality of the tests. This study aimed to investigate frequency of functioning and non-functioning distractors and the relationship between the distractors options with difficulty and discrimination in Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical sciences in 2017. Methods: In this descriptive-analytic study, the distractors of the MCQs in the immunology were examined. The distractors were those that selected by more than 5% of the examinees', they were considered as Functioning Distractors (FDs) and by less than 5% of the examinees' were considered as non-functioning distractors (NFDs). Data were analyzed using Analysis of Variances and Pearson correlation coefficient; for all tests error was considered as 5%. Results: Out of 2124 distractors, 1361 (64.08%) were FDs and 763 (35.92%) were NFDs. The frequency of MCQs with 0, 1, 2 and 3 FDs was 12.4%, 19.5%, 31.5% and 36.6%, respectively. There was a significant negative correlation between the number of FDs and the difficulty index (r=0.442, p=0.000), but there was not a significant correlation between the number of FDs and the discriminative index of MCQs (r=0.043, p=0.259). Conclusion: The findings showed that more than one-thirds of the distractors were NFDs. As a result of increasing the number of NFDs, the difficulty and the discriminative indices of questions decreased and led to a drop in the quality of the test. Item analysis results could be used to identify and remove non-functioning distractors from MCQs that have been used to improve the quality exam.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T12:59:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-62f1e4891ac14f85b2856f120d344218
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1608-9359
1735-8892
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-11T12:59:30Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Medical Education Development Center
record_format Article
series مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی
spelling doaj.art-62f1e4891ac14f85b2856f120d3442182023-11-03T16:50:49ZfasIsfahan University of Medical Sciences, Medical Education Development Centerمجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی1608-93591735-88922019-04-0119180188A Survey on Distractors in Multiple-choice Questions and its Relationship on Difficulty and Discriminative IndicesAbdolhussein Shakurnia0 Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences Introduction: The distractors have a very important role in Multiple-Choice Question (MCQ) and it can influence the quality of the tests. This study aimed to investigate frequency of functioning and non-functioning distractors and the relationship between the distractors options with difficulty and discrimination in Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical sciences in 2017. Methods: In this descriptive-analytic study, the distractors of the MCQs in the immunology were examined. The distractors were those that selected by more than 5% of the examinees', they were considered as Functioning Distractors (FDs) and by less than 5% of the examinees' were considered as non-functioning distractors (NFDs). Data were analyzed using Analysis of Variances and Pearson correlation coefficient; for all tests error was considered as 5%. Results: Out of 2124 distractors, 1361 (64.08%) were FDs and 763 (35.92%) were NFDs. The frequency of MCQs with 0, 1, 2 and 3 FDs was 12.4%, 19.5%, 31.5% and 36.6%, respectively. There was a significant negative correlation between the number of FDs and the difficulty index (r=0.442, p=0.000), but there was not a significant correlation between the number of FDs and the discriminative index of MCQs (r=0.043, p=0.259). Conclusion: The findings showed that more than one-thirds of the distractors were NFDs. As a result of increasing the number of NFDs, the difficulty and the discriminative indices of questions decreased and led to a drop in the quality of the test. Item analysis results could be used to identify and remove non-functioning distractors from MCQs that have been used to improve the quality exam.http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-4776-en.pdfstudent assessmentmultiple-choice questionsdistractorsfunctioning distractorsnon-functioning distractorsdifficulty indexdiscriminative index
spellingShingle Abdolhussein Shakurnia
A Survey on Distractors in Multiple-choice Questions and its Relationship on Difficulty and Discriminative Indices
مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی
student assessment
multiple-choice questions
distractors
functioning distractors
non-functioning distractors
difficulty index
discriminative index
title A Survey on Distractors in Multiple-choice Questions and its Relationship on Difficulty and Discriminative Indices
title_full A Survey on Distractors in Multiple-choice Questions and its Relationship on Difficulty and Discriminative Indices
title_fullStr A Survey on Distractors in Multiple-choice Questions and its Relationship on Difficulty and Discriminative Indices
title_full_unstemmed A Survey on Distractors in Multiple-choice Questions and its Relationship on Difficulty and Discriminative Indices
title_short A Survey on Distractors in Multiple-choice Questions and its Relationship on Difficulty and Discriminative Indices
title_sort survey on distractors in multiple choice questions and its relationship on difficulty and discriminative indices
topic student assessment
multiple-choice questions
distractors
functioning distractors
non-functioning distractors
difficulty index
discriminative index
url http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-4776-en.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT abdolhusseinshakurnia asurveyondistractorsinmultiplechoicequestionsanditsrelationshipondifficultyanddiscriminativeindices
AT abdolhusseinshakurnia surveyondistractorsinmultiplechoicequestionsanditsrelationshipondifficultyanddiscriminativeindices