EXPERIENCE GAINED BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AND ITS CHALLENGES IN RESOLVING CONSTITUTIONAL DISPUTES BETWEEN STATE AUTHORITIES

This article presents the experience gained by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania in resolving disputes between state authorities and, at the same time, the challenges in ensuring both the supremacy of the Constitution as the supreme law and the rule of law. First, the content of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Danutė Jočienė
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mykolas Romeris University 2022-02-01
Series:Jurisprudencija
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/jurisprudence/article/view/6855
_version_ 1818284111543926784
author Danutė Jočienė
author_facet Danutė Jočienė
author_sort Danutė Jočienė
collection DOAJ
description This article presents the experience gained by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania in resolving disputes between state authorities and, at the same time, the challenges in ensuring both the supremacy of the Constitution as the supreme law and the rule of law. First, the content of the constitutional principle of the separation of powers (which is enshrined, among others, in Article 5 of the Constitution) as the legal basis for disputes between public authorities is revealed. As the Constitutional Court has repeatedly pointed out, this principle is the main principle of the democratic organisation and functioning of a state under the rule of law. After that, based on the interpretation of the constitutional principle of the separation of powers in the official constitutional doctrine, those challenges are illustrated by analysing constitutional disputes in the specific most prominent constitutional justice cases in recent years (2018–2021) in which the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania and the Government of the Republic of Lithuania were most involved. It is apparent from the examined constitutional justice cases that the Constitutional Court has a strong responsibility, in the process of examining the constitutionality of legal acts, to act as a prudent arbitrator in disputes between public authorities before it, with a view, on the one hand, to ensuring the constitutional balance and harmonious functioning of the system of public authorities as a whole and, on the other hand, to creating the preconditions for the proper exercise by those authorities of the competence enjoyed by them under the Constitution. The protection of the constitutional principle of the separation of powers and the related constitutional imperatives, and the proper operation of the mechanisms established by the Constitution to ensure the smooth functioning of the state authorities and cooperation between them are important for the Constitutional Court in the course of administering constitutional justice entrusted to it.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T00:47:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-62f4a01c008e402a8dbd988c171ce048
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1392-6195
2029-2058
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T00:47:37Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher Mykolas Romeris University
record_format Article
series Jurisprudencija
spelling doaj.art-62f4a01c008e402a8dbd988c171ce0482022-12-22T00:04:59ZengMykolas Romeris UniversityJurisprudencija1392-61952029-20582022-02-0128210.13165/JUR-21-28-2-01EXPERIENCE GAINED BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AND ITS CHALLENGES IN RESOLVING CONSTITUTIONAL DISPUTES BETWEEN STATE AUTHORITIESDanutė JočienėThis article presents the experience gained by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania in resolving disputes between state authorities and, at the same time, the challenges in ensuring both the supremacy of the Constitution as the supreme law and the rule of law. First, the content of the constitutional principle of the separation of powers (which is enshrined, among others, in Article 5 of the Constitution) as the legal basis for disputes between public authorities is revealed. As the Constitutional Court has repeatedly pointed out, this principle is the main principle of the democratic organisation and functioning of a state under the rule of law. After that, based on the interpretation of the constitutional principle of the separation of powers in the official constitutional doctrine, those challenges are illustrated by analysing constitutional disputes in the specific most prominent constitutional justice cases in recent years (2018–2021) in which the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania and the Government of the Republic of Lithuania were most involved. It is apparent from the examined constitutional justice cases that the Constitutional Court has a strong responsibility, in the process of examining the constitutionality of legal acts, to act as a prudent arbitrator in disputes between public authorities before it, with a view, on the one hand, to ensuring the constitutional balance and harmonious functioning of the system of public authorities as a whole and, on the other hand, to creating the preconditions for the proper exercise by those authorities of the competence enjoyed by them under the Constitution. The protection of the constitutional principle of the separation of powers and the related constitutional imperatives, and the proper operation of the mechanisms established by the Constitution to ensure the smooth functioning of the state authorities and cooperation between them are important for the Constitutional Court in the course of administering constitutional justice entrusted to it.https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/jurisprudence/article/view/6855the constitutional court of the republic of lithuaniaensuring the supremacy of the constitution as the supreme law and the rule of lawofficial constitutional doctrinethe constitutional principle of the separation of powers
spellingShingle Danutė Jočienė
EXPERIENCE GAINED BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AND ITS CHALLENGES IN RESOLVING CONSTITUTIONAL DISPUTES BETWEEN STATE AUTHORITIES
Jurisprudencija
the constitutional court of the republic of lithuania
ensuring the supremacy of the constitution as the supreme law and the rule of law
official constitutional doctrine
the constitutional principle of the separation of powers
title EXPERIENCE GAINED BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AND ITS CHALLENGES IN RESOLVING CONSTITUTIONAL DISPUTES BETWEEN STATE AUTHORITIES
title_full EXPERIENCE GAINED BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AND ITS CHALLENGES IN RESOLVING CONSTITUTIONAL DISPUTES BETWEEN STATE AUTHORITIES
title_fullStr EXPERIENCE GAINED BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AND ITS CHALLENGES IN RESOLVING CONSTITUTIONAL DISPUTES BETWEEN STATE AUTHORITIES
title_full_unstemmed EXPERIENCE GAINED BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AND ITS CHALLENGES IN RESOLVING CONSTITUTIONAL DISPUTES BETWEEN STATE AUTHORITIES
title_short EXPERIENCE GAINED BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AND ITS CHALLENGES IN RESOLVING CONSTITUTIONAL DISPUTES BETWEEN STATE AUTHORITIES
title_sort experience gained by the constitutional court and its challenges in resolving constitutional disputes between state authorities
topic the constitutional court of the republic of lithuania
ensuring the supremacy of the constitution as the supreme law and the rule of law
official constitutional doctrine
the constitutional principle of the separation of powers
url https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/jurisprudence/article/view/6855
work_keys_str_mv AT danutejociene experiencegainedbytheconstitutionalcourtanditschallengesinresolvingconstitutionaldisputesbetweenstateauthorities