The value of statistical tools to detect data fabrication

The value of statistical tools to detect data fabrication

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Chris Hartgerink, Jelte Wicherts, Marcel van Assen
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Pensoft Publishers 2016-04-01
Series:	Research Ideas and Outcomes
Online Access:	https://riojournal.com/article/8860/

Similar Items

Research practices and assessment of research misconduct
by: Chris Hartgerink, et al.
Published: (2016-07-01)

Distributions of p-values smaller than .05 in psychology: what is going on?
by: Chris H.J. Hartgerink, et al.
Published: (2016-04-01)

Statistical Reporting Errors and Collaboration on Statistical Analyses in Psychological Science.
by: Coosje L S Veldkamp, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01)

Journal Data Sharing Policies and Statistical Reporting Inconsistencies in Psychology
by: Michèle B. Nuijten, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01)

The ordinal effects of ostracism: a meta-analysis of 120 Cyberball studies.
by: Chris H J Hartgerink, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results.
by: Jelte M Wicherts, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01)

Science revolves around the data
by: Jelte M Wicherts
Published: (2013-06-01)

Too Good to be False: Nonsignificant Results Revisited
by: Chris H. J. Hartgerink, et al.
Published: (2017-03-01)

Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis.
by: Robbie C M van Aert, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals.
by: Jelte M Wicherts
Published: (2016-01-01)

The Weak Spots in Contemporary Science (and How to Fix Them)
by: Jelte M. Wicherts
Published: (2017-11-01)

Reproducibility of individual effect sizes in meta-analyses in psychology.
by: Esther Maassen, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Effect Sizes, Power, and Biases in Intelligence Research: A Meta-Meta-Analysis
by: Michèle B. Nuijten, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studiesA checklist to avoid p - hacking
by: Jelte M Wicherts, et al.
Published: (2016-11-01)

Problematic trial detection in ClinicalTrials.gov
by: Chris Hartgerink, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01)

Recommendations in pre-registrations and internal review board proposals promote formal power analyses but do not increase sample size.
by: Marjan Bakker, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Verified, Shared, Modular, and Provenance Based Research Communication with the Dat Protocol
by: Chris Hartgerink
Published: (2019-06-01)

Comparing the prevalence of statistical reporting inconsistencies in COVID-19 preprints and matched controls: a registered report
by: Robbie C. M. van Aert, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations.
by: Marjan Bakker, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)

Data from ‘Cohort Differences in Big Five Personality Factors Over a Period of 25 Years’
by: Iris A. M. Smits, et al.
Published: (2013-06-01)

Extreme value statistics for novelty detection in biomedical data processing
by: Roberts, S
Published: (2000)

Questionable research practices among italian research psychologists.
by: Franca Agnoli, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

No Effect of Weight on Judgments of Importance in the Moral Domain and Evidence of Publication Bias from a Meta-Analysis.
by: André L A Rabelo, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Approach, avoidance, and affect: A meta-analysis of approach-avoidance tendencies in manual reaction time tasks
by: Hans ePhaf, et al.
Published: (2014-05-01)

Letting the daylight in: Reviewing the reviewers and other ways to maximize transparency in science
by: Jelte M Wicherts, et al.
Published: (2012-04-01)

Statistical Modeling of Spirality and Thickness Values in Plain Knitted Fabrics
by: S. Mezarcıöz
Published: (2022-12-01)

Reanalyzing Head et al. (2015): investigating the robustness of widespread p-hacking
by: Chris H.J. Hartgerink
Published: (2017-03-01)

PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF THE COMPUTERIZED BATTERY FOR NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF CHILDREN (BENCI) AMONG SCHOOL AGED CHILDREN IN THE CONTEXT OF HIV IN A KENYAN SETTING
by: Rachel Maina, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

“As-You-Go” Instead of “After-the-Fact”: A Network Approach to Scholarly Communication and Evaluation
by: Chris H. J. Hartgerink, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01)

Earnings Management, Enterprise Scale and Enterprise Value—Research Based on Data and Statistical Analysis Tools
by: Mengxiao Yang
Published: (2021-01-01)

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic value of optokinetic after-nystagmus in vestibular disorders
by: Marie Reynders, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01)

Psychometric evaluation of the computerized battery for neuropsychological evaluation of children (BENCI) among school aged children in the context of HIV in an urban Kenyan setting
by: Maina Rachel, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01)

Novelty detection with multivariate extreme value statistics
by: Clifton, D, et al.
Published: (2010)

Inferential Statistics Is an Unfit Tool for Interpreting Data
by: Anders Sand
Published: (2022-07-01)

Basic statistical tools in research and data analysis
by: Zulfiqar Ali, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Statistics : tools for understanding data in the behavioral sciences /
by: 240088 Vaughan, Eva D.
Published: (1998)

Detection statistics for multichannel data
Published: (2004)

Descriptive statistics for symbolic interval-valued data
by: H K RANGANATH, et al.
Published: (2014-03-01)

Erratum: Basic statistical tools in research and data analysis
Published: (2016-01-01)

Electrothermal Actuators for SiO2 Photonic MEMS
by: Tjitte-Jelte Peters, et al.
Published: (2016-11-01)