Emission factors of health‐ and climate‐relevant pollutants measured in home during a carbon‐finance‐approved cookstove intervention in rural India

Abstract We present results of an emission characterization effort, completed as part of a larger intervention trial, of a carbon‐finance‐approved program replacing traditional cookstoves with “rocket”‐style natural draft stoves. The 100 emission tests were conducted across 31 households in control...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew P. Grieshop, Grishma Jain, Karthik Sethuraman, Julian D. Marshall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2017-07-01
Series:GeoHealth
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GH000066
_version_ 1818295560576172032
author Andrew P. Grieshop
Grishma Jain
Karthik Sethuraman
Julian D. Marshall
author_facet Andrew P. Grieshop
Grishma Jain
Karthik Sethuraman
Julian D. Marshall
author_sort Andrew P. Grieshop
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We present results of an emission characterization effort, completed as part of a larger intervention trial, of a carbon‐finance‐approved program replacing traditional cookstoves with “rocket”‐style natural draft stoves. The 100 emission tests were conducted across 31 households in control and intervention groups, with repeated tests in most households during preintervention and postintervention periods. While mean fine particulate matter (PM2.5) emission factor for intervention stoves was significantly lower than for traditional stoves in baseline measurements, they were only marginally lower than traditional stoves during follow‐up. Intervention stove PM2.5 emissions had a larger contribution from light‐absorbing (elemental) carbon than traditional stoves. Repeated measurements in control households provide evidence for strong seasonality, likely due to differences in fuel moisture/types, in traditional stove emissions, with important implications for study design. Seasonality observed in control household emission factors (baseline > follow‐up) was in the opposite direction as that observed in indoor PM2.5 concentrations (baseline < follow‐up), highlighting that seasonally varying conditions (e.g., ventilation rates) may modify the link between emissions and exposures. Emission factor differences in paired (pre/post) tests from the same households were similar to differences in the medians of entire groups, suggesting variability is dominated by test‐to‐test variation. Emission reductions from intervention stoves were significantly smaller than laboratory performance would suggest or that are required to strongly reduce exposures. Field emissions assessment like that presented here should be prioritized early in technology assessment and development to provide rigorous estimates of the benefits reasonably expected from interventions with the potential for substantial benefits to human health and the environment.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T03:49:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-62fc6e32de2845acac9a4e171bf61729
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2471-1403
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T03:49:35Z
publishDate 2017-07-01
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
record_format Article
series GeoHealth
spelling doaj.art-62fc6e32de2845acac9a4e171bf617292022-12-22T00:00:44ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)GeoHealth2471-14032017-07-011522223610.1002/2017GH000066Emission factors of health‐ and climate‐relevant pollutants measured in home during a carbon‐finance‐approved cookstove intervention in rural IndiaAndrew P. Grieshop0Grishma Jain1Karthik Sethuraman2Julian D. Marshall3Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering North Carolina State University at Raleigh Raleigh North Carolina USAResource Optimization Initiative Bangalore IndiaResource Optimization Initiative Bangalore IndiaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Washington Seattle Washington USAAbstract We present results of an emission characterization effort, completed as part of a larger intervention trial, of a carbon‐finance‐approved program replacing traditional cookstoves with “rocket”‐style natural draft stoves. The 100 emission tests were conducted across 31 households in control and intervention groups, with repeated tests in most households during preintervention and postintervention periods. While mean fine particulate matter (PM2.5) emission factor for intervention stoves was significantly lower than for traditional stoves in baseline measurements, they were only marginally lower than traditional stoves during follow‐up. Intervention stove PM2.5 emissions had a larger contribution from light‐absorbing (elemental) carbon than traditional stoves. Repeated measurements in control households provide evidence for strong seasonality, likely due to differences in fuel moisture/types, in traditional stove emissions, with important implications for study design. Seasonality observed in control household emission factors (baseline > follow‐up) was in the opposite direction as that observed in indoor PM2.5 concentrations (baseline < follow‐up), highlighting that seasonally varying conditions (e.g., ventilation rates) may modify the link between emissions and exposures. Emission factor differences in paired (pre/post) tests from the same households were similar to differences in the medians of entire groups, suggesting variability is dominated by test‐to‐test variation. Emission reductions from intervention stoves were significantly smaller than laboratory performance would suggest or that are required to strongly reduce exposures. Field emissions assessment like that presented here should be prioritized early in technology assessment and development to provide rigorous estimates of the benefits reasonably expected from interventions with the potential for substantial benefits to human health and the environment.https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GH000066environmental healthindoor air qualityintervention trialCDMhousehold energyhousehold air pollution
spellingShingle Andrew P. Grieshop
Grishma Jain
Karthik Sethuraman
Julian D. Marshall
Emission factors of health‐ and climate‐relevant pollutants measured in home during a carbon‐finance‐approved cookstove intervention in rural India
GeoHealth
environmental health
indoor air quality
intervention trial
CDM
household energy
household air pollution
title Emission factors of health‐ and climate‐relevant pollutants measured in home during a carbon‐finance‐approved cookstove intervention in rural India
title_full Emission factors of health‐ and climate‐relevant pollutants measured in home during a carbon‐finance‐approved cookstove intervention in rural India
title_fullStr Emission factors of health‐ and climate‐relevant pollutants measured in home during a carbon‐finance‐approved cookstove intervention in rural India
title_full_unstemmed Emission factors of health‐ and climate‐relevant pollutants measured in home during a carbon‐finance‐approved cookstove intervention in rural India
title_short Emission factors of health‐ and climate‐relevant pollutants measured in home during a carbon‐finance‐approved cookstove intervention in rural India
title_sort emission factors of health and climate relevant pollutants measured in home during a carbon finance approved cookstove intervention in rural india
topic environmental health
indoor air quality
intervention trial
CDM
household energy
household air pollution
url https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GH000066
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewpgrieshop emissionfactorsofhealthandclimaterelevantpollutantsmeasuredinhomeduringacarbonfinanceapprovedcookstoveinterventioninruralindia
AT grishmajain emissionfactorsofhealthandclimaterelevantpollutantsmeasuredinhomeduringacarbonfinanceapprovedcookstoveinterventioninruralindia
AT karthiksethuraman emissionfactorsofhealthandclimaterelevantpollutantsmeasuredinhomeduringacarbonfinanceapprovedcookstoveinterventioninruralindia
AT juliandmarshall emissionfactorsofhealthandclimaterelevantpollutantsmeasuredinhomeduringacarbonfinanceapprovedcookstoveinterventioninruralindia