Benefits and Limitations of Winch-Assist Technology for Skidding Operations

Skidders are very cost-effective extraction machines, and winch-assist systems may extend their operating range to increasingly steep terrain. The use of winch-assist skidder systems is relatively new, and little information is available about their operational efficiency and potential soil impact....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rien M. Visser, Raffaele Spinelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/14/2/296
_version_ 1797620952113086464
author Rien M. Visser
Raffaele Spinelli
author_facet Rien M. Visser
Raffaele Spinelli
author_sort Rien M. Visser
collection DOAJ
description Skidders are very cost-effective extraction machines, and winch-assist systems may extend their operating range to increasingly steep terrain. The use of winch-assist skidder systems is relatively new, and little information is available about their operational efficiency and potential soil impact. A productivity and soil disturbance study was carried out in Southland (New Zealand) to gauge the benefits of winch assistance by comparing the performance of the same two-axle skidder with and without winch assistance on increasingly steep trails (30 and 40% gradients). The delay-free productivity approached 100 m<sup>3</sup> solid volume over bark per productive machine hour (PMH) under the best conditions and declined with the extraction distance, reducing to approximately 40 m<sup>3</sup> PMH<sup>−1</sup> at 300 m. On the 30% slope trail, winch assistance allowed an 8% productivity gain through a significant increase in the payload size. However, on the 40% slope trail, the increased payload size allowed by winch assistance was unable to offset the much lower empty speed and, therefore, the control treatment (no winch assistance) performed better. A preliminary soil disturbance assessment was carried out over the whole harvest site using a line transect method. The assessment was conducted at the end of the harvest and reflected the impact of all the operational activities, including mechanised felling and skid trail construction, not just skidding. Soil disturbance appeared to be low, as ruts deeper than 15 cm covered only 2% of the inspected surface.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T08:48:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-62fdd36a9305405c9d977b80e9ede95a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4907
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T08:48:49Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Forests
spelling doaj.art-62fdd36a9305405c9d977b80e9ede95a2023-11-16T20:34:01ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072023-02-0114229610.3390/f14020296Benefits and Limitations of Winch-Assist Technology for Skidding OperationsRien M. Visser0Raffaele Spinelli1School of Forestry, University of Canterbury, 20 Kirkwood Avenue, Upper Riccarton, Christchurch 8041, New ZealandConsiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche—Istituto per la Bioeconomia (CNR IBE), Via Madonna del Piano 10, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino (FI), ItalySkidders are very cost-effective extraction machines, and winch-assist systems may extend their operating range to increasingly steep terrain. The use of winch-assist skidder systems is relatively new, and little information is available about their operational efficiency and potential soil impact. A productivity and soil disturbance study was carried out in Southland (New Zealand) to gauge the benefits of winch assistance by comparing the performance of the same two-axle skidder with and without winch assistance on increasingly steep trails (30 and 40% gradients). The delay-free productivity approached 100 m<sup>3</sup> solid volume over bark per productive machine hour (PMH) under the best conditions and declined with the extraction distance, reducing to approximately 40 m<sup>3</sup> PMH<sup>−1</sup> at 300 m. On the 30% slope trail, winch assistance allowed an 8% productivity gain through a significant increase in the payload size. However, on the 40% slope trail, the increased payload size allowed by winch assistance was unable to offset the much lower empty speed and, therefore, the control treatment (no winch assistance) performed better. A preliminary soil disturbance assessment was carried out over the whole harvest site using a line transect method. The assessment was conducted at the end of the harvest and reflected the impact of all the operational activities, including mechanised felling and skid trail construction, not just skidding. Soil disturbance appeared to be low, as ruts deeper than 15 cm covered only 2% of the inspected surface.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/14/2/296productivityloggingharvestingmountainsoil disturbance
spellingShingle Rien M. Visser
Raffaele Spinelli
Benefits and Limitations of Winch-Assist Technology for Skidding Operations
Forests
productivity
logging
harvesting
mountain
soil disturbance
title Benefits and Limitations of Winch-Assist Technology for Skidding Operations
title_full Benefits and Limitations of Winch-Assist Technology for Skidding Operations
title_fullStr Benefits and Limitations of Winch-Assist Technology for Skidding Operations
title_full_unstemmed Benefits and Limitations of Winch-Assist Technology for Skidding Operations
title_short Benefits and Limitations of Winch-Assist Technology for Skidding Operations
title_sort benefits and limitations of winch assist technology for skidding operations
topic productivity
logging
harvesting
mountain
soil disturbance
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/14/2/296
work_keys_str_mv AT rienmvisser benefitsandlimitationsofwinchassisttechnologyforskiddingoperations
AT raffaelespinelli benefitsandlimitationsofwinchassisttechnologyforskiddingoperations