Significance of acPWV for Survival of Hemodialysis Patients

Background and Objectives: Abnormal arterial stiffness (AS) is a major complication in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients treated by dialysis. Our study aimed to determine the significance of AS for survival of prevalent dialysis patients, as well as its association with cardiovascular paramet...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marko Petrovic, Marko Baralic, Voin Brkovic, Aleksandra Arsenovic, Vesna Stojanov, Natasa Lalic, Dejana Stanisavljevic, Aleksandar Jankovic, Nenad Radivojevic, Svetlana Pejanovic, Ivko Maric, Visnja Lezaic
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-08-01
Series:Medicina
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1010-660X/56/9/435
_version_ 1797728133387911168
author Marko Petrovic
Marko Baralic
Voin Brkovic
Aleksandra Arsenovic
Vesna Stojanov
Natasa Lalic
Dejana Stanisavljevic
Aleksandar Jankovic
Nenad Radivojevic
Svetlana Pejanovic
Ivko Maric
Visnja Lezaic
author_facet Marko Petrovic
Marko Baralic
Voin Brkovic
Aleksandra Arsenovic
Vesna Stojanov
Natasa Lalic
Dejana Stanisavljevic
Aleksandar Jankovic
Nenad Radivojevic
Svetlana Pejanovic
Ivko Maric
Visnja Lezaic
author_sort Marko Petrovic
collection DOAJ
description Background and Objectives: Abnormal arterial stiffness (AS) is a major complication in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients treated by dialysis. Our study aimed to determine the significance of AS for survival of prevalent dialysis patients, as well as its association with cardiovascular parameters or vascular calcification promoters/inhibitors or both and AS. Materials and Methods: The study involved 80 adult hemodialysis patients. Besides standard laboratory analyses, we also determined promoters and inhibitors of vascular calcification (bone biomarkers): serum levels of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), soluble Klotho, intact parathormone (iPTH), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, osteoprotegerin, sclerostin, AS measured as ankle carotid pulse wave velocity (acPWV), Ankle Brachial Index (ABI), and vascular calcification (VC) score. Patients were monitored for up to 28 months. According to the median acPWV value, we divided patients into a group with acPWV ≤ 8.8 m/s, and a group with acPWV > 8.8 m/s, and the two groups were compared. Results: Values for bone biomarkers were similar in both groups. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), central systolic and diastolic brachial blood pressure, heart rate, and pulse pressure were higher in the group with acPWV > 8.8 m/s than in the group with acPWV ≤ 8.8 m/s. The mortality was higher for patients with acPWV > 8.8 m/s at any given time over 28 months of follow-up. In multivariable analysis, predictors of higher acPWV were age >60.5, higher pulse rate, and higher central systolic or brachial diastolic blood pressure. Conclusions: According to our results, we advise the measurement of acPWV preferentially in younger dialysis patients for prognosis, as well as intervention planning before the development of irreversible changes in blood vessels. In addition, measuring central systolic blood pressure seems to be useful for monitoring AS in prevalent hemodialysis patients.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T11:09:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-630b05bbc74449e3af5914b51700a67a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1010-660X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T11:09:30Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Medicina
spelling doaj.art-630b05bbc74449e3af5914b51700a67a2023-09-02T03:12:51ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X2020-08-015643543510.3390/medicina56090435Significance of acPWV for Survival of Hemodialysis PatientsMarko Petrovic0Marko Baralic1Voin Brkovic2Aleksandra Arsenovic3Vesna Stojanov4Natasa Lalic5Dejana Stanisavljevic6Aleksandar Jankovic7Nenad Radivojevic8Svetlana Pejanovic9Ivko Maric10Visnja Lezaic11Clinical Centre of Serbia, Department of Nephrology, 11000 Belgrade, SerbiaClinical Centre of Serbia, Department of Nephrology, 11000 Belgrade, SerbiaClinical Centre of Serbia, Department of Nephrology, 11000 Belgrade, SerbiaSpecial Hospital for Endemic Nephropathy, 11555 Lazarevac, SerbiaSchool of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, SerbiaClinical Centre of Serbia, Centre for Medical Biochemistry, 11000 Belgrade, SerbiaInstitute for Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, SerbiaClinical Department for Renal Diseases, Zvezdara University Medical Center, 11000 Belgrade, SerbiaClinical Centre of Serbia, Department of Cardiology, 11000 Belgrade, SerbiaClinical Centre of Serbia, Department of Nephrology, 11000 Belgrade, SerbiaSpecial Hospital for Endemic Nephropathy, 11555 Lazarevac, SerbiaClinical Centre of Serbia, Department of Nephrology, 11000 Belgrade, SerbiaBackground and Objectives: Abnormal arterial stiffness (AS) is a major complication in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients treated by dialysis. Our study aimed to determine the significance of AS for survival of prevalent dialysis patients, as well as its association with cardiovascular parameters or vascular calcification promoters/inhibitors or both and AS. Materials and Methods: The study involved 80 adult hemodialysis patients. Besides standard laboratory analyses, we also determined promoters and inhibitors of vascular calcification (bone biomarkers): serum levels of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), soluble Klotho, intact parathormone (iPTH), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, osteoprotegerin, sclerostin, AS measured as ankle carotid pulse wave velocity (acPWV), Ankle Brachial Index (ABI), and vascular calcification (VC) score. Patients were monitored for up to 28 months. According to the median acPWV value, we divided patients into a group with acPWV ≤ 8.8 m/s, and a group with acPWV > 8.8 m/s, and the two groups were compared. Results: Values for bone biomarkers were similar in both groups. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), central systolic and diastolic brachial blood pressure, heart rate, and pulse pressure were higher in the group with acPWV > 8.8 m/s than in the group with acPWV ≤ 8.8 m/s. The mortality was higher for patients with acPWV > 8.8 m/s at any given time over 28 months of follow-up. In multivariable analysis, predictors of higher acPWV were age >60.5, higher pulse rate, and higher central systolic or brachial diastolic blood pressure. Conclusions: According to our results, we advise the measurement of acPWV preferentially in younger dialysis patients for prognosis, as well as intervention planning before the development of irreversible changes in blood vessels. In addition, measuring central systolic blood pressure seems to be useful for monitoring AS in prevalent hemodialysis patients.https://www.mdpi.com/1010-660X/56/9/435prevalent hemodialysis patientsarterial stiffnessbiomarkerscardiovascular assessmentoutcome
spellingShingle Marko Petrovic
Marko Baralic
Voin Brkovic
Aleksandra Arsenovic
Vesna Stojanov
Natasa Lalic
Dejana Stanisavljevic
Aleksandar Jankovic
Nenad Radivojevic
Svetlana Pejanovic
Ivko Maric
Visnja Lezaic
Significance of acPWV for Survival of Hemodialysis Patients
Medicina
prevalent hemodialysis patients
arterial stiffness
biomarkers
cardiovascular assessment
outcome
title Significance of acPWV for Survival of Hemodialysis Patients
title_full Significance of acPWV for Survival of Hemodialysis Patients
title_fullStr Significance of acPWV for Survival of Hemodialysis Patients
title_full_unstemmed Significance of acPWV for Survival of Hemodialysis Patients
title_short Significance of acPWV for Survival of Hemodialysis Patients
title_sort significance of acpwv for survival of hemodialysis patients
topic prevalent hemodialysis patients
arterial stiffness
biomarkers
cardiovascular assessment
outcome
url https://www.mdpi.com/1010-660X/56/9/435
work_keys_str_mv AT markopetrovic significanceofacpwvforsurvivalofhemodialysispatients
AT markobaralic significanceofacpwvforsurvivalofhemodialysispatients
AT voinbrkovic significanceofacpwvforsurvivalofhemodialysispatients
AT aleksandraarsenovic significanceofacpwvforsurvivalofhemodialysispatients
AT vesnastojanov significanceofacpwvforsurvivalofhemodialysispatients
AT natasalalic significanceofacpwvforsurvivalofhemodialysispatients
AT dejanastanisavljevic significanceofacpwvforsurvivalofhemodialysispatients
AT aleksandarjankovic significanceofacpwvforsurvivalofhemodialysispatients
AT nenadradivojevic significanceofacpwvforsurvivalofhemodialysispatients
AT svetlanapejanovic significanceofacpwvforsurvivalofhemodialysispatients
AT ivkomaric significanceofacpwvforsurvivalofhemodialysispatients
AT visnjalezaic significanceofacpwvforsurvivalofhemodialysispatients