Complete versus culprit-only revascularization in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease
Introduction/Objective. The optimal percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with non-STelevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) is still not clear. The aim of our study was to examine intrahospital and long-term major adverse cardiovascular a...
Main Authors: | Jaraković Milana, Petrović Milovan, Ivanišević Dragan, Mihajlović Bojan, Kovačević Mila, Popov Iva |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Serbian Medical Society
2023-01-01
|
Series: | Srpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvo |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0370-8179/2023/0370-81792300002J.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Staged revascularization vs. culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease in elderly patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
by: Jiachun Lang, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
Complete versus culprit-only revascularization during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease: A meta-analysis
by: Cong Lu, et al.
Published: (2013-03-01) -
Optimal Revascularization Strategy in Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Culprit‐Only Versus One‐Stage Versus Multistage Revascularization
by: Min Chul Kim, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01) -
Culprit vessel vs. immediate multivessel vs. out-of-hospital staged intervention for patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease
by: Chen Wang, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01) -
Clinical effectiveness of complete revascularization versus infarct-related artery-only percutaneous coronary revascularization for multivessel disease ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
by: Joshua Chadwick Jayaraj
Published: (2018-01-01)