Cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer

BackgroundThe efficiency and safety of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) for the therapy of hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (BC) has been demonstrated. The aim of this study is to evaluate its cost-effectiveness on HR+/HER2- metastatic BC...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Demin Shi, Yan Li, Xueyan Liang, Lingyuan Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1162360/full
_version_ 1797828930922610688
author Demin Shi
Yan Li
Xueyan Liang
Lingyuan Chen
author_facet Demin Shi
Yan Li
Xueyan Liang
Lingyuan Chen
author_sort Demin Shi
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundThe efficiency and safety of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) for the therapy of hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (BC) has been demonstrated. The aim of this study is to evaluate its cost-effectiveness on HR+/HER2- metastatic BC from the third-party payer perspective in the United States.MethodsWe performed the cost-effectiveness of SG and chemotherapy using a partitioned survival model. TROPiCS-02 provided clinical patients for this study. We evaluated the robustness of this study by one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Subgroup analyses were also conducted. The outcomes were costs, life-years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), incremental net health benefit (INHB), and incremental net monetary benefit (INMB).ResultsSG treatment was related to an increase of 0.284 life years and 0.217 QALYs over chemotherapy, as well as a cost increase of $132,689, reaching an ICER of $612,772/QALY. The INHB was -0.668 QALYs, and the INMB was -$100,208. SG was not cost-effective at the willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000/QALY. The outcomes were sensitive to patient body weight and cost of SG. SG may be cost-effective at the WTP threshold of $150,000/QALY if the price is less than $3.997/mg or the weight of patients is under 19.88 kg. Based on the subgroup analysis, SG did not prove cost-effective in all subgroups at the WTP threshold of $150,000/QALY.ConclusionFrom a third-party payer standpoint in the United States, SG was not cost-effective, even though it had a clinically significant advantage over chemotherapy for the treatment of HR+/HER2- metastatic BC. The cost-effectiveness of SG can be improved if the price is substantially reduced.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T13:12:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-632d5c887efa4f399fe1f791726381e5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-943X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T13:12:19Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj.art-632d5c887efa4f399fe1f791726381e52023-05-12T06:25:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2023-05-011310.3389/fonc.2023.11623601162360Cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancerDemin Shi0Yan Li1Xueyan Liang2Lingyuan Chen3Department of Reproductive Medicine, The People’s Hospital of Hechi, Hechi, Guangxi, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and the People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and the People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, The People’s Hospital of Hechi, Hechi, Guangxi, ChinaBackgroundThe efficiency and safety of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) for the therapy of hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (BC) has been demonstrated. The aim of this study is to evaluate its cost-effectiveness on HR+/HER2- metastatic BC from the third-party payer perspective in the United States.MethodsWe performed the cost-effectiveness of SG and chemotherapy using a partitioned survival model. TROPiCS-02 provided clinical patients for this study. We evaluated the robustness of this study by one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Subgroup analyses were also conducted. The outcomes were costs, life-years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), incremental net health benefit (INHB), and incremental net monetary benefit (INMB).ResultsSG treatment was related to an increase of 0.284 life years and 0.217 QALYs over chemotherapy, as well as a cost increase of $132,689, reaching an ICER of $612,772/QALY. The INHB was -0.668 QALYs, and the INMB was -$100,208. SG was not cost-effective at the willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000/QALY. The outcomes were sensitive to patient body weight and cost of SG. SG may be cost-effective at the WTP threshold of $150,000/QALY if the price is less than $3.997/mg or the weight of patients is under 19.88 kg. Based on the subgroup analysis, SG did not prove cost-effective in all subgroups at the WTP threshold of $150,000/QALY.ConclusionFrom a third-party payer standpoint in the United States, SG was not cost-effective, even though it had a clinically significant advantage over chemotherapy for the treatment of HR+/HER2- metastatic BC. The cost-effectiveness of SG can be improved if the price is substantially reduced.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1162360/fullcost-effectivenesssacituzumab govitecanbreast cancerhormone receptor-positivehuman epidermal receptor 2-negativepartitioned survival model
spellingShingle Demin Shi
Yan Li
Xueyan Liang
Lingyuan Chen
Cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer
Frontiers in Oncology
cost-effectiveness
sacituzumab govitecan
breast cancer
hormone receptor-positive
human epidermal receptor 2-negative
partitioned survival model
title Cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer
title_full Cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer
title_short Cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer
title_sort cost effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan in hormone receptor positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative metastatic breast cancer
topic cost-effectiveness
sacituzumab govitecan
breast cancer
hormone receptor-positive
human epidermal receptor 2-negative
partitioned survival model
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1162360/full
work_keys_str_mv AT deminshi costeffectivenessofsacituzumabgovitecaninhormonereceptorpositivehumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2negativemetastaticbreastcancer
AT yanli costeffectivenessofsacituzumabgovitecaninhormonereceptorpositivehumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2negativemetastaticbreastcancer
AT xueyanliang costeffectivenessofsacituzumabgovitecaninhormonereceptorpositivehumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2negativemetastaticbreastcancer
AT lingyuanchen costeffectivenessofsacituzumabgovitecaninhormonereceptorpositivehumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2negativemetastaticbreastcancer