Validity evidence of the brazilian version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)

Mindfulness is a skill that allows the practitioner to expand an existing space between stimulus and response, so he/she may make more conscious choices which in turn prevents the perpetuation of dysfunctional patterns of behaviors, contributing to the improvement of his/her well-being. The goal of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Víviam Vargas de Barros, Elisa Harumi Kozasa, Isabel Cristina Weiss de Souza, Telmo Mota Ronzani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2015-03-01
Series:Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722015000100087&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1811293203155910656
author Víviam Vargas de Barros
Elisa Harumi Kozasa
Isabel Cristina Weiss de Souza
Telmo Mota Ronzani
author_facet Víviam Vargas de Barros
Elisa Harumi Kozasa
Isabel Cristina Weiss de Souza
Telmo Mota Ronzani
author_sort Víviam Vargas de Barros
collection DOAJ
description Mindfulness is a skill that allows the practitioner to expand an existing space between stimulus and response, so he/she may make more conscious choices which in turn prevents the perpetuation of dysfunctional patterns of behaviors, contributing to the improvement of his/her well-being. The goal of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) in a sample with 395 participants divided into smokers, people from the general population, college students and meditators. They answered the MAAS and the Psychological Well-Being Scale (PWBS). An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to test the factor structure of the MAAS. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability and split half were respectively assessed with Cronbach's α and correlation coefficients. Construct validity was examined by correlating the MAAS with psychological well-being. Criterion validity was assessed by comparing the meditators' scores on the MAAS with the scores of other participants. After the exploratory factor analysis, the Brazilian MAAS remained a unidimensional scale. Reliability [α = .83; split half = .67 and test-retest = .80 (p < .001)] and validity measures were adequate, except the criterion validity which was not confirmed in the mentioned sample.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T04:58:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-633bf26d450c423b8011062e86de56df
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1678-7153
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T04:58:04Z
publishDate 2015-03-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica
spelling doaj.art-633bf26d450c423b8011062e86de56df2022-12-22T03:01:25ZengSpringerOpenPsicologia: Reflexão e Crítica1678-71532015-03-01281879510.1590/1678-7153.201528110S0102-79722015000100087Validity evidence of the brazilian version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)Víviam Vargas de BarrosElisa Harumi KozasaIsabel Cristina Weiss de SouzaTelmo Mota RonzaniMindfulness is a skill that allows the practitioner to expand an existing space between stimulus and response, so he/she may make more conscious choices which in turn prevents the perpetuation of dysfunctional patterns of behaviors, contributing to the improvement of his/her well-being. The goal of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) in a sample with 395 participants divided into smokers, people from the general population, college students and meditators. They answered the MAAS and the Psychological Well-Being Scale (PWBS). An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to test the factor structure of the MAAS. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability and split half were respectively assessed with Cronbach's α and correlation coefficients. Construct validity was examined by correlating the MAAS with psychological well-being. Criterion validity was assessed by comparing the meditators' scores on the MAAS with the scores of other participants. After the exploratory factor analysis, the Brazilian MAAS remained a unidimensional scale. Reliability [α = .83; split half = .67 and test-retest = .80 (p < .001)] and validity measures were adequate, except the criterion validity which was not confirmed in the mentioned sample.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722015000100087&lng=en&tlng=enAtenção plenaconsciência plenaMAASPsicometria
spellingShingle Víviam Vargas de Barros
Elisa Harumi Kozasa
Isabel Cristina Weiss de Souza
Telmo Mota Ronzani
Validity evidence of the brazilian version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)
Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica
Atenção plena
consciência plena
MAAS
Psicometria
title Validity evidence of the brazilian version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)
title_full Validity evidence of the brazilian version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)
title_fullStr Validity evidence of the brazilian version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)
title_full_unstemmed Validity evidence of the brazilian version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)
title_short Validity evidence of the brazilian version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)
title_sort validity evidence of the brazilian version of the mindful attention awareness scale maas
topic Atenção plena
consciência plena
MAAS
Psicometria
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722015000100087&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT viviamvargasdebarros validityevidenceofthebrazilianversionofthemindfulattentionawarenessscalemaas
AT elisaharumikozasa validityevidenceofthebrazilianversionofthemindfulattentionawarenessscalemaas
AT isabelcristinaweissdesouza validityevidenceofthebrazilianversionofthemindfulattentionawarenessscalemaas
AT telmomotaronzani validityevidenceofthebrazilianversionofthemindfulattentionawarenessscalemaas