Relationship between journal impact factor and the thoroughness and helpfulness of peer reviews.
The Journal Impact Factor is often used as a proxy measure for journal quality, but the empirical evidence is scarce. In particular, it is unclear how peer review characteristics for a journal relate to its impact factor. We analysed 10,000 peer review reports submitted to 1,644 biomedical journals...
Main Authors: | Anna Severin, Michaela Strinzel, Matthias Egger, Tiago Barros, Alexander Sokolov, Julia Vilstrup Mouatt, Stefan Müller |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2023-08-01
|
Series: | PLoS Biology |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002238 |
Similar Items
-
Correction for Strinzel et al., “Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis”
by: Michaela Strinzel, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01) -
Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis
by: Michaela Strinzel, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Erratum for Strinzel et al., “Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis”
by: Michaela Strinzel, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
Thorough;
by: White, David Allen, M. Arch Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Published: (2021) -
Teneligliptin and “Thorough QTc study”: thorough enough?
by: Ghosal S
Published: (2019-07-01)