Less Is More – Estimation of the Number of Strides Required to Assess Gait Variability in Spatially Confined Settings

Background: Gait variability is an established marker of gait function that can be assessed using sensor-based approaches. In clinical settings, spatial constraints and patient condition impede the execution of longer distance walks for the recording of gait parameters. Turning paradigms are often u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Kroneberg, Morad Elshehabi, Anne-Christiane Meyer, Karen Otte, Sarah Doss, Friedemann Paul, Susanne Nussbaum, Daniela Berg, Andrea A. Kühn, Walter Maetzler, Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00435/full
_version_ 1819016987024556032
author Daniel Kroneberg
Morad Elshehabi
Morad Elshehabi
Anne-Christiane Meyer
Karen Otte
Sarah Doss
Friedemann Paul
Friedemann Paul
Friedemann Paul
Susanne Nussbaum
Daniela Berg
Daniela Berg
Andrea A. Kühn
Andrea A. Kühn
Andrea A. Kühn
Andrea A. Kühn
Walter Maetzler
Walter Maetzler
Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch
Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch
author_facet Daniel Kroneberg
Morad Elshehabi
Morad Elshehabi
Anne-Christiane Meyer
Karen Otte
Sarah Doss
Friedemann Paul
Friedemann Paul
Friedemann Paul
Susanne Nussbaum
Daniela Berg
Daniela Berg
Andrea A. Kühn
Andrea A. Kühn
Andrea A. Kühn
Andrea A. Kühn
Walter Maetzler
Walter Maetzler
Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch
Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch
author_sort Daniel Kroneberg
collection DOAJ
description Background: Gait variability is an established marker of gait function that can be assessed using sensor-based approaches. In clinical settings, spatial constraints and patient condition impede the execution of longer distance walks for the recording of gait parameters. Turning paradigms are often used to overcome these constraints and commercial gait analysis systems algorithmically exclude turns for gait parameters calculations. We investigated the effect of turns in sensor-based assessment of gait variability.Methods: Continuous recordings from 31 patients with movement disorders (ataxia, essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease) and 162 healthy elderly (HE) performing level walks including 180° turns were obtained using an inertial sensor system. Accuracy of the manufacturer’s algorithm of turn-detection was verified by plotting stride time series. Strides before and after turn events were extracted and compared to respective average of all strides. Coefficient of variation (CoV) of stride length and stride time was calculated for entire set of strides, segments between turns and as cumulative values. Their variance and congruency was used to estimate the number of strides required to reliably assess the magnitude of stride variability.Results: Non-detection of turns in 5.8% of HE lead to falsely increased CoV for these individuals. Even after exclusion of these, strides before/after turns tended to be spatially shorter and temporally longer in all groups, contributing to an increase of CoV at group level and widening of confidence margins with increasing numbers of strides. This could be attenuated by a more generous turn excision as an alternative approach. Correlation analyses revealed excellent consistency for CoVs after at most 20 strides in all groups. Respective stride counts were even lower in patients using a more generous turn excision.Conclusion: Including turns to increase continuous walking distance in spatially confined settings does not necessarily improve the validity and reliability of gait variability measures. Specifically with gait pathology, perturbations of stride characteristics before/after algorithmically excised turns were observed that may increase gait variability with this paradigm. We conclude that shorter distance walks of around 15 strides suffice for reliable and valid recordings of gait variability in the groups studied here.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T02:56:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-63451ad904f14dc4a5c07242164cae7b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1663-4365
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T02:56:21Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-63451ad904f14dc4a5c07242164cae7b2022-12-21T19:18:19ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience1663-43652019-01-011010.3389/fnagi.2018.00435389096Less Is More – Estimation of the Number of Strides Required to Assess Gait Variability in Spatially Confined SettingsDaniel Kroneberg0Morad Elshehabi1Morad Elshehabi2Anne-Christiane Meyer3Karen Otte4Sarah Doss5Friedemann Paul6Friedemann Paul7Friedemann Paul8Susanne Nussbaum9Daniela Berg10Daniela Berg11Andrea A. Kühn12Andrea A. Kühn13Andrea A. Kühn14Andrea A. Kühn15Walter Maetzler16Walter Maetzler17Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch18Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch19Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Neurology, Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, GermanyDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Center for Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, GermanyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Neurology, Berlin, GermanyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Neurocure Cluster of Excellence, Berlin, GermanyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Neurology, Berlin, GermanyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Neurology, Berlin, GermanyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Neurocure Cluster of Excellence, Berlin, GermanyExperimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Center for Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, GermanyDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Center for Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, GermanyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Neurology, Berlin, GermanyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Neurocure Cluster of Excellence, Berlin, GermanyExperimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, GermanyBerlin School of Mind and Brain, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, GermanyDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Center for Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, GermanyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Neurocure Cluster of Excellence, Berlin, GermanyExperimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, GermanyBackground: Gait variability is an established marker of gait function that can be assessed using sensor-based approaches. In clinical settings, spatial constraints and patient condition impede the execution of longer distance walks for the recording of gait parameters. Turning paradigms are often used to overcome these constraints and commercial gait analysis systems algorithmically exclude turns for gait parameters calculations. We investigated the effect of turns in sensor-based assessment of gait variability.Methods: Continuous recordings from 31 patients with movement disorders (ataxia, essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease) and 162 healthy elderly (HE) performing level walks including 180° turns were obtained using an inertial sensor system. Accuracy of the manufacturer’s algorithm of turn-detection was verified by plotting stride time series. Strides before and after turn events were extracted and compared to respective average of all strides. Coefficient of variation (CoV) of stride length and stride time was calculated for entire set of strides, segments between turns and as cumulative values. Their variance and congruency was used to estimate the number of strides required to reliably assess the magnitude of stride variability.Results: Non-detection of turns in 5.8% of HE lead to falsely increased CoV for these individuals. Even after exclusion of these, strides before/after turns tended to be spatially shorter and temporally longer in all groups, contributing to an increase of CoV at group level and widening of confidence margins with increasing numbers of strides. This could be attenuated by a more generous turn excision as an alternative approach. Correlation analyses revealed excellent consistency for CoVs after at most 20 strides in all groups. Respective stride counts were even lower in patients using a more generous turn excision.Conclusion: Including turns to increase continuous walking distance in spatially confined settings does not necessarily improve the validity and reliability of gait variability measures. Specifically with gait pathology, perturbations of stride characteristics before/after algorithmically excised turns were observed that may increase gait variability with this paradigm. We conclude that shorter distance walks of around 15 strides suffice for reliable and valid recordings of gait variability in the groups studied here.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00435/fullgait variabilitygait analysisturn detectionhealthy elderlymovement disorders
spellingShingle Daniel Kroneberg
Morad Elshehabi
Morad Elshehabi
Anne-Christiane Meyer
Karen Otte
Sarah Doss
Friedemann Paul
Friedemann Paul
Friedemann Paul
Susanne Nussbaum
Daniela Berg
Daniela Berg
Andrea A. Kühn
Andrea A. Kühn
Andrea A. Kühn
Andrea A. Kühn
Walter Maetzler
Walter Maetzler
Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch
Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch
Less Is More – Estimation of the Number of Strides Required to Assess Gait Variability in Spatially Confined Settings
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
gait variability
gait analysis
turn detection
healthy elderly
movement disorders
title Less Is More – Estimation of the Number of Strides Required to Assess Gait Variability in Spatially Confined Settings
title_full Less Is More – Estimation of the Number of Strides Required to Assess Gait Variability in Spatially Confined Settings
title_fullStr Less Is More – Estimation of the Number of Strides Required to Assess Gait Variability in Spatially Confined Settings
title_full_unstemmed Less Is More – Estimation of the Number of Strides Required to Assess Gait Variability in Spatially Confined Settings
title_short Less Is More – Estimation of the Number of Strides Required to Assess Gait Variability in Spatially Confined Settings
title_sort less is more estimation of the number of strides required to assess gait variability in spatially confined settings
topic gait variability
gait analysis
turn detection
healthy elderly
movement disorders
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00435/full
work_keys_str_mv AT danielkroneberg lessismoreestimationofthenumberofstridesrequiredtoassessgaitvariabilityinspatiallyconfinedsettings
AT moradelshehabi lessismoreestimationofthenumberofstridesrequiredtoassessgaitvariabilityinspatiallyconfinedsettings
AT moradelshehabi lessismoreestimationofthenumberofstridesrequiredtoassessgaitvariabilityinspatiallyconfinedsettings
AT annechristianemeyer lessismoreestimationofthenumberofstridesrequiredtoassessgaitvariabilityinspatiallyconfinedsettings
AT karenotte lessismoreestimationofthenumberofstridesrequiredtoassessgaitvariabilityinspatiallyconfinedsettings
AT sarahdoss lessismoreestimationofthenumberofstridesrequiredtoassessgaitvariabilityinspatiallyconfinedsettings
AT friedemannpaul lessismoreestimationofthenumberofstridesrequiredtoassessgaitvariabilityinspatiallyconfinedsettings
AT friedemannpaul lessismoreestimationofthenumberofstridesrequiredtoassessgaitvariabilityinspatiallyconfinedsettings
AT friedemannpaul lessismoreestimationofthenumberofstridesrequiredtoassessgaitvariabilityinspatiallyconfinedsettings
AT susannenussbaum lessismoreestimationofthenumberofstridesrequiredtoassessgaitvariabilityinspatiallyconfinedsettings
AT danielaberg lessismoreestimationofthenumberofstridesrequiredtoassessgaitvariabilityinspatiallyconfinedsettings
AT danielaberg lessismoreestimationofthenumberofstridesrequiredtoassessgaitvariabilityinspatiallyconfinedsettings
AT andreaakuhn lessismoreestimationofthenumberofstridesrequiredtoassessgaitvariabilityinspatiallyconfinedsettings
AT andreaakuhn lessismoreestimationofthenumberofstridesrequiredtoassessgaitvariabilityinspatiallyconfinedsettings
AT andreaakuhn lessismoreestimationofthenumberofstridesrequiredtoassessgaitvariabilityinspatiallyconfinedsettings
AT andreaakuhn lessismoreestimationofthenumberofstridesrequiredtoassessgaitvariabilityinspatiallyconfinedsettings
AT waltermaetzler lessismoreestimationofthenumberofstridesrequiredtoassessgaitvariabilityinspatiallyconfinedsettings
AT waltermaetzler lessismoreestimationofthenumberofstridesrequiredtoassessgaitvariabilityinspatiallyconfinedsettings
AT tanjaschmitzhubsch lessismoreestimationofthenumberofstridesrequiredtoassessgaitvariabilityinspatiallyconfinedsettings
AT tanjaschmitzhubsch lessismoreestimationofthenumberofstridesrequiredtoassessgaitvariabilityinspatiallyconfinedsettings