The imprint of exile through the plot of the narratives
Exile is a circumstance different from other migrations, although it resembles them in the possible insertion or alienation from the receiving society. It is with no a doubt a forced migration process which is always accompanied by an idea and an imaginary: the disappearrance of the conditions that...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina
2010-06-01
|
| Series: | Antíteses |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/4759/4922 |
| _version_ | 1818019688338161664 |
|---|---|
| author | Silvia Dutrénit Bielous |
| author_facet | Silvia Dutrénit Bielous |
| author_sort | Silvia Dutrénit Bielous |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Exile is a circumstance different from other migrations, although it resembles them in the possible insertion or alienation from the receiving society. It is with no a doubt a forced migration process which is always accompanied by an idea and an imaginary: the disappearrance of the conditions that forced to exile and thus, the return.Although it is not possible to generalize, because there is no one single experience of exile and the subjectivities that compose it are diverse, it undoubtedly produces a sensation of alienation, which can lead to the rejection of the cultural norms of society; it is part of a process of “being in one place, but thinking about another.” However, as exile is prolonged, the experience of adaptation for the different generations involved becomes diversified, communication vessels develop, feelings of inclusion, of adaptation, of attachment with the social and cultural environment that the place of refuge offered.The present text builds on testimonies of Uruguayans exiled in Mexico who have returned to their country. In their narrative, the meanings that relate to the subjective perspective that provoked the “return” to their country of origin as being viable and a palpable event are perceived. In summary, an incursion through the testimonial plot explains to what extent the return is a recovery of the space of identity longed for and the subsequent abandonment of the foreign space, in other words, it adds to the perspective of identity as a dynamic and relational construction. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-14T07:55:39Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-634ad7e56a5a423b91b5f70ec63143cc |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1984-3356 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-14T07:55:39Z |
| publishDate | 2010-06-01 |
| publisher | Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Antíteses |
| spelling | doaj.art-634ad7e56a5a423b91b5f70ec63143cc2022-12-22T02:05:04ZengUniversidade Estadual de LondrinaAntíteses1984-33562010-06-0135513528The imprint of exile through the plot of the narrativesSilvia Dutrénit BielousExile is a circumstance different from other migrations, although it resembles them in the possible insertion or alienation from the receiving society. It is with no a doubt a forced migration process which is always accompanied by an idea and an imaginary: the disappearrance of the conditions that forced to exile and thus, the return.Although it is not possible to generalize, because there is no one single experience of exile and the subjectivities that compose it are diverse, it undoubtedly produces a sensation of alienation, which can lead to the rejection of the cultural norms of society; it is part of a process of “being in one place, but thinking about another.” However, as exile is prolonged, the experience of adaptation for the different generations involved becomes diversified, communication vessels develop, feelings of inclusion, of adaptation, of attachment with the social and cultural environment that the place of refuge offered.The present text builds on testimonies of Uruguayans exiled in Mexico who have returned to their country. In their narrative, the meanings that relate to the subjective perspective that provoked the “return” to their country of origin as being viable and a palpable event are perceived. In summary, an incursion through the testimonial plot explains to what extent the return is a recovery of the space of identity longed for and the subsequent abandonment of the foreign space, in other words, it adds to the perspective of identity as a dynamic and relational construction.http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/4759/4922ExileidentitynarrationUruguayMexico |
| spellingShingle | Silvia Dutrénit Bielous The imprint of exile through the plot of the narratives Antíteses Exile identity narration Uruguay Mexico |
| title | The imprint of exile through the plot of the narratives |
| title_full | The imprint of exile through the plot of the narratives |
| title_fullStr | The imprint of exile through the plot of the narratives |
| title_full_unstemmed | The imprint of exile through the plot of the narratives |
| title_short | The imprint of exile through the plot of the narratives |
| title_sort | imprint of exile through the plot of the narratives |
| topic | Exile identity narration Uruguay Mexico |
| url | http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/4759/4922 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT silviadutrenitbielous theimprintofexilethroughtheplotofthenarratives AT silviadutrenitbielous imprintofexilethroughtheplotofthenarratives |