Prognostic tools or clinical predictions: Which are better in palliative care?
<h4>Purpose</h4>The Palliative Prognostic (PaP) score; Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI); Feliu Prognostic Nomogram (FPN) and Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) have all been proposed as prognostic tools for palliative cancer care. However, clinical judgement remains the principal way by...
Main Authors: | P Stone, V Vickerstaff, A Kalpakidou, C Todd, J Griffiths, V Keeley, K Spencer, P Buckle, D Finlay, R Z Omar |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249763 |
Similar Items
-
The Prognosis in Palliative care Study II (PiPS2): A prospective observational validation study of a prognostic tool with an embedded qualitative evaluation.
by: P C Stone, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Prognostic models of survival in patients with advanced incurable cancer: the PiPS2 observational study
by: Patrick Stone, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01) -
The Prognosis in Palliative care Study II (PiPS2): study protocol for a multi-centre, prospective, observational, cohort study
by: Anastasia K. Kalpakidou, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01) -
Correction to: The prognosis in palliative care study II (PiPS2): study protocol for a multi-centre, prospective, observational, cohort study
by: Anastasia K. Kalpakidou, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
The accuracy of clinician predictions of survival in the Prognosis in Palliative care Study II (PiPS2): A prospective observational study.
by: Patrick C Stone, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)