Validation of geriatric depression and anxiety rating scales into Arabic
Abstract Introduction This study aimed to examine the validity and internal consistency of Arabic version of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (A‐CSDD) and compare it to the Geriatric Depression and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales. Methods Hundred fifty individuals were recruited;...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2018.06.006 |
_version_ | 1818209933152223232 |
---|---|
author | Georges Elie Karam Mohannad Nawaf Khandakji Nayri Sarkis Sahakian Jessica Christian Dandan Elie Georges Karam |
author_facet | Georges Elie Karam Mohannad Nawaf Khandakji Nayri Sarkis Sahakian Jessica Christian Dandan Elie Georges Karam |
author_sort | Georges Elie Karam |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Introduction This study aimed to examine the validity and internal consistency of Arabic version of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (A‐CSDD) and compare it to the Geriatric Depression and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales. Methods Hundred fifty individuals were recruited; they underwent a clinical interview and filled the A‐CSDD, Geriatric Depression Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The depression rating scales were validated against the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual disorders. Results A‐CSDD found to have sensitivity of 70%, specificity of 91%, and internal consistency of 0.89. The presence of depression was significantly associated with dementia. The associations of the A‐CSDD with Arabic Geriatric Depression Scale (r: 0.3) and Arabic Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (r: 0.4) were lower in the demented group than in the nondemented group (r: 0.7 and 0.8, respectively). Conclusion The diagnosis of depression in the context of dementia may be challenging. With this validated version, clinicians now have a tool helping them with the diagnosis. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-12T05:08:35Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6378eddb36074974bee724810d3f73ce |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2352-8729 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-12T05:08:35Z |
publishDate | 2018-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring |
spelling | doaj.art-6378eddb36074974bee724810d3f73ce2022-12-22T00:37:01ZengWileyAlzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring2352-87292018-01-0110179179510.1016/j.dadm.2018.06.006Validation of geriatric depression and anxiety rating scales into ArabicGeorges Elie Karam0Mohannad Nawaf Khandakji1Nayri Sarkis Sahakian2Jessica Christian Dandan3Elie Georges Karam4Institute for DevelopmentResearch, Advocacy and Applied Care (IDRAAC)BeirutLebanonDepartment of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsAmerican University of Beirut Medical CenterBeirutLebanonInstitute for DevelopmentResearch, Advocacy and Applied Care (IDRAAC)BeirutLebanonInstitute for DevelopmentResearch, Advocacy and Applied Care (IDRAAC)BeirutLebanonInstitute for DevelopmentResearch, Advocacy and Applied Care (IDRAAC)BeirutLebanonAbstract Introduction This study aimed to examine the validity and internal consistency of Arabic version of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (A‐CSDD) and compare it to the Geriatric Depression and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales. Methods Hundred fifty individuals were recruited; they underwent a clinical interview and filled the A‐CSDD, Geriatric Depression Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The depression rating scales were validated against the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual disorders. Results A‐CSDD found to have sensitivity of 70%, specificity of 91%, and internal consistency of 0.89. The presence of depression was significantly associated with dementia. The associations of the A‐CSDD with Arabic Geriatric Depression Scale (r: 0.3) and Arabic Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (r: 0.4) were lower in the demented group than in the nondemented group (r: 0.7 and 0.8, respectively). Conclusion The diagnosis of depression in the context of dementia may be challenging. With this validated version, clinicians now have a tool helping them with the diagnosis.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2018.06.006ArabicDementiaDepressionScalesCSDDValidation |
spellingShingle | Georges Elie Karam Mohannad Nawaf Khandakji Nayri Sarkis Sahakian Jessica Christian Dandan Elie Georges Karam Validation of geriatric depression and anxiety rating scales into Arabic Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring Arabic Dementia Depression Scales CSDD Validation |
title | Validation of geriatric depression and anxiety rating scales into Arabic |
title_full | Validation of geriatric depression and anxiety rating scales into Arabic |
title_fullStr | Validation of geriatric depression and anxiety rating scales into Arabic |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of geriatric depression and anxiety rating scales into Arabic |
title_short | Validation of geriatric depression and anxiety rating scales into Arabic |
title_sort | validation of geriatric depression and anxiety rating scales into arabic |
topic | Arabic Dementia Depression Scales CSDD Validation |
url | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2018.06.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT georgeseliekaram validationofgeriatricdepressionandanxietyratingscalesintoarabic AT mohannadnawafkhandakji validationofgeriatricdepressionandanxietyratingscalesintoarabic AT nayrisarkissahakian validationofgeriatricdepressionandanxietyratingscalesintoarabic AT jessicachristiandandan validationofgeriatricdepressionandanxietyratingscalesintoarabic AT eliegeorgeskaram validationofgeriatricdepressionandanxietyratingscalesintoarabic |