Validation of geriatric depression and anxiety rating scales into Arabic

Abstract Introduction This study aimed to examine the validity and internal consistency of Arabic version of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (A‐CSDD) and compare it to the Geriatric Depression and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales. Methods Hundred fifty individuals were recruited;...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Georges Elie Karam, Mohannad Nawaf Khandakji, Nayri Sarkis Sahakian, Jessica Christian Dandan, Elie Georges Karam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2018.06.006
_version_ 1818209933152223232
author Georges Elie Karam
Mohannad Nawaf Khandakji
Nayri Sarkis Sahakian
Jessica Christian Dandan
Elie Georges Karam
author_facet Georges Elie Karam
Mohannad Nawaf Khandakji
Nayri Sarkis Sahakian
Jessica Christian Dandan
Elie Georges Karam
author_sort Georges Elie Karam
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction This study aimed to examine the validity and internal consistency of Arabic version of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (A‐CSDD) and compare it to the Geriatric Depression and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales. Methods Hundred fifty individuals were recruited; they underwent a clinical interview and filled the A‐CSDD, Geriatric Depression Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The depression rating scales were validated against the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual disorders. Results A‐CSDD found to have sensitivity of 70%, specificity of 91%, and internal consistency of 0.89. The presence of depression was significantly associated with dementia. The associations of the A‐CSDD with Arabic Geriatric Depression Scale (r: 0.3) and Arabic Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (r: 0.4) were lower in the demented group than in the nondemented group (r: 0.7 and 0.8, respectively). Conclusion The diagnosis of depression in the context of dementia may be challenging. With this validated version, clinicians now have a tool helping them with the diagnosis.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T05:08:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6378eddb36074974bee724810d3f73ce
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-8729
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T05:08:35Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
spelling doaj.art-6378eddb36074974bee724810d3f73ce2022-12-22T00:37:01ZengWileyAlzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring2352-87292018-01-0110179179510.1016/j.dadm.2018.06.006Validation of geriatric depression and anxiety rating scales into ArabicGeorges Elie Karam0Mohannad Nawaf Khandakji1Nayri Sarkis Sahakian2Jessica Christian Dandan3Elie Georges Karam4Institute for DevelopmentResearch, Advocacy and Applied Care (IDRAAC)BeirutLebanonDepartment of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsAmerican University of Beirut Medical CenterBeirutLebanonInstitute for DevelopmentResearch, Advocacy and Applied Care (IDRAAC)BeirutLebanonInstitute for DevelopmentResearch, Advocacy and Applied Care (IDRAAC)BeirutLebanonInstitute for DevelopmentResearch, Advocacy and Applied Care (IDRAAC)BeirutLebanonAbstract Introduction This study aimed to examine the validity and internal consistency of Arabic version of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (A‐CSDD) and compare it to the Geriatric Depression and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales. Methods Hundred fifty individuals were recruited; they underwent a clinical interview and filled the A‐CSDD, Geriatric Depression Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The depression rating scales were validated against the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual disorders. Results A‐CSDD found to have sensitivity of 70%, specificity of 91%, and internal consistency of 0.89. The presence of depression was significantly associated with dementia. The associations of the A‐CSDD with Arabic Geriatric Depression Scale (r: 0.3) and Arabic Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (r: 0.4) were lower in the demented group than in the nondemented group (r: 0.7 and 0.8, respectively). Conclusion The diagnosis of depression in the context of dementia may be challenging. With this validated version, clinicians now have a tool helping them with the diagnosis.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2018.06.006ArabicDementiaDepressionScalesCSDDValidation
spellingShingle Georges Elie Karam
Mohannad Nawaf Khandakji
Nayri Sarkis Sahakian
Jessica Christian Dandan
Elie Georges Karam
Validation of geriatric depression and anxiety rating scales into Arabic
Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
Arabic
Dementia
Depression
Scales
CSDD
Validation
title Validation of geriatric depression and anxiety rating scales into Arabic
title_full Validation of geriatric depression and anxiety rating scales into Arabic
title_fullStr Validation of geriatric depression and anxiety rating scales into Arabic
title_full_unstemmed Validation of geriatric depression and anxiety rating scales into Arabic
title_short Validation of geriatric depression and anxiety rating scales into Arabic
title_sort validation of geriatric depression and anxiety rating scales into arabic
topic Arabic
Dementia
Depression
Scales
CSDD
Validation
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2018.06.006
work_keys_str_mv AT georgeseliekaram validationofgeriatricdepressionandanxietyratingscalesintoarabic
AT mohannadnawafkhandakji validationofgeriatricdepressionandanxietyratingscalesintoarabic
AT nayrisarkissahakian validationofgeriatricdepressionandanxietyratingscalesintoarabic
AT jessicachristiandandan validationofgeriatricdepressionandanxietyratingscalesintoarabic
AT eliegeorgeskaram validationofgeriatricdepressionandanxietyratingscalesintoarabic