Density and genetic diversity of grizzly bears at the northern edge of their distribution

Abstract Species at the periphery of their range are typically limited in density by poor habitat quality. As a result, the central–marginal hypothesis (CMH) predicts a decline in genetic diversity of populations toward the periphery of a species' range. Grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) once ranged...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mirjam Barrueto, Tyler D. Jessen, Rianne Diepstraten, Marco Musiani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-06-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4523
_version_ 1797219389206953984
author Mirjam Barrueto
Tyler D. Jessen
Rianne Diepstraten
Marco Musiani
author_facet Mirjam Barrueto
Tyler D. Jessen
Rianne Diepstraten
Marco Musiani
author_sort Mirjam Barrueto
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Species at the periphery of their range are typically limited in density by poor habitat quality. As a result, the central–marginal hypothesis (CMH) predicts a decline in genetic diversity of populations toward the periphery of a species' range. Grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) once ranged throughout most of North America but have been extirpated from nearly half of their former range, mainly in the south. They are considered a species at risk even in Canada's remote North, where they occupy the northernmost edge of the species' continental distribution in a low‐productivity tundra environment. With climate change, one of their main prey species in the tundra (caribou), which has always shown yearly fluctuations, is declining, but simultaneously, grizzlies appear to be expanding their range northward in the same tundra environment. Yet, a lack of population density estimates across the North is hindering effective conservation action. The CMH has implications for the viability of peripheral populations, and the links between population fluctuations, potential bottlenecks, and genetic diversity need to be determined to contribute to species' conservation. Using noninvasive genetic sampling from 2012 to 2014 and autosomal DNA genotyping (via microsatellites), we estimated bear density using a spatial capture–recapture framework and analyzed genetic diversity using observed heterozygosity (Ho), allelic richness (AR), and expected heterozygosity (He). We compared our findings to other studies that used comparable methodologies on grizzly bears and a related species (black bears; Ursus americanus). We found densities of grizzly bears that were low for the species but characteristic for the region (5.9 ± 0.4 bears/1000 km2), but with high Ho (0.81 ± 0.05), AR (7 ± 0.78), and He (0.71 ± 0.03), despite a signal of recent bottlenecks. In both species, peripherality was not correlated with Ho but was negatively correlated with density. We suggest that the apparent growth of this expanding population of grizzlies offsets the negative impacts of recent bottlenecks on Ho. Indigenous knowledge provides historical context (on the order of centuries, e.g., arctic large mammal fluctuations, grizzly bear bottlenecks) for the current bear population dynamics (on the order of decades, e.g., climate change, northern grizzly bear expansion).
first_indexed 2024-03-13T02:34:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6379b9022dde4235afeaeb0892a45ecd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2150-8925
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T12:32:52Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecosphere
spelling doaj.art-6379b9022dde4235afeaeb0892a45ecd2024-04-07T23:33:20ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252023-06-01146n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.4523Density and genetic diversity of grizzly bears at the northern edge of their distributionMirjam Barrueto0Tyler D. Jessen1Rianne Diepstraten2Marco Musiani3Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science University of Calgary Calgary Alberta CanadaDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences University of Victoria Victoria British Columbia CanadaFaculty of Environmental Design University of Calgary Calgary Alberta CanadaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science University of Calgary Calgary Alberta CanadaAbstract Species at the periphery of their range are typically limited in density by poor habitat quality. As a result, the central–marginal hypothesis (CMH) predicts a decline in genetic diversity of populations toward the periphery of a species' range. Grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) once ranged throughout most of North America but have been extirpated from nearly half of their former range, mainly in the south. They are considered a species at risk even in Canada's remote North, where they occupy the northernmost edge of the species' continental distribution in a low‐productivity tundra environment. With climate change, one of their main prey species in the tundra (caribou), which has always shown yearly fluctuations, is declining, but simultaneously, grizzlies appear to be expanding their range northward in the same tundra environment. Yet, a lack of population density estimates across the North is hindering effective conservation action. The CMH has implications for the viability of peripheral populations, and the links between population fluctuations, potential bottlenecks, and genetic diversity need to be determined to contribute to species' conservation. Using noninvasive genetic sampling from 2012 to 2014 and autosomal DNA genotyping (via microsatellites), we estimated bear density using a spatial capture–recapture framework and analyzed genetic diversity using observed heterozygosity (Ho), allelic richness (AR), and expected heterozygosity (He). We compared our findings to other studies that used comparable methodologies on grizzly bears and a related species (black bears; Ursus americanus). We found densities of grizzly bears that were low for the species but characteristic for the region (5.9 ± 0.4 bears/1000 km2), but with high Ho (0.81 ± 0.05), AR (7 ± 0.78), and He (0.71 ± 0.03), despite a signal of recent bottlenecks. In both species, peripherality was not correlated with Ho but was negatively correlated with density. We suggest that the apparent growth of this expanding population of grizzlies offsets the negative impacts of recent bottlenecks on Ho. Indigenous knowledge provides historical context (on the order of centuries, e.g., arctic large mammal fluctuations, grizzly bear bottlenecks) for the current bear population dynamics (on the order of decades, e.g., climate change, northern grizzly bear expansion).https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4523Arcticdensitygenetic bottleneckgenetic diversitygrizzly bearhair‐snagging
spellingShingle Mirjam Barrueto
Tyler D. Jessen
Rianne Diepstraten
Marco Musiani
Density and genetic diversity of grizzly bears at the northern edge of their distribution
Ecosphere
Arctic
density
genetic bottleneck
genetic diversity
grizzly bear
hair‐snagging
title Density and genetic diversity of grizzly bears at the northern edge of their distribution
title_full Density and genetic diversity of grizzly bears at the northern edge of their distribution
title_fullStr Density and genetic diversity of grizzly bears at the northern edge of their distribution
title_full_unstemmed Density and genetic diversity of grizzly bears at the northern edge of their distribution
title_short Density and genetic diversity of grizzly bears at the northern edge of their distribution
title_sort density and genetic diversity of grizzly bears at the northern edge of their distribution
topic Arctic
density
genetic bottleneck
genetic diversity
grizzly bear
hair‐snagging
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4523
work_keys_str_mv AT mirjambarrueto densityandgeneticdiversityofgrizzlybearsatthenorthernedgeoftheirdistribution
AT tylerdjessen densityandgeneticdiversityofgrizzlybearsatthenorthernedgeoftheirdistribution
AT riannediepstraten densityandgeneticdiversityofgrizzlybearsatthenorthernedgeoftheirdistribution
AT marcomusiani densityandgeneticdiversityofgrizzlybearsatthenorthernedgeoftheirdistribution