Predicting the Most Common Incorrect Response: Metacognitive Advantage of Deliberative Over Intuitive Responders on Cognitive Reflection Test
In this study, we investigated the hypothesis that deliberative responders are at metacognitive advantage in comparison with intuitive responders because they are aware that there exists an appealing, but incorrect response, and that many would probably fall for it. A total of 169 participants solv...
Main Authors: | Lamija Šćeta, Josip Sliško, Nikola Erceg |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Slovak Academy of Sciences, Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences
2022-09-01
|
Series: | Studia Psychologica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.savba.sk/index.php/studiapsychologica/article/view/666 |
Similar Items
-
Intuitive and Deliberative Decision-Making in Negotiations
by: Zulauf Katrin, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01) -
Using metacognitive cues to infer others’ thinking
by: André Mata, et al.
Published: (2014-07-01) -
Using metacognitive
cues to infer others' thinking
by: André Mata, et al.
Published: (2014-07-01) -
Unconscious intuition or conscious analysis? Critical questions for the Deliberation-Without-Attention paradigm
by: Balazs Aczel, et al.
Published: (2011-06-01) -
Why Should We Study the Foreign Language Effect: Debiasing through Affecting Metacognition?
by: Michał Białek
Published: (2023-05-01)