Metabolic cost of unloading pedalling in different groups of patients with pulmonary hypertension and volunteers

Abstract Recently, the parameter internal work (IW) has been introduced as change in oxygen uptake (VO2) between resting and unloading workload in cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). The proportional IW (PIW) was defined as IW divided by VO2 at peak exercise. A second option is to calculate the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Till Ittermann, Sabine Kaczmarek, Anne Obst, Raik Könemann, Martin Bahls, Marcus Dörr, Beate Stubbe, Alexander Heine, Dirk Habedank, Ralf Ewert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2024-03-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55980-z
_version_ 1827327445048492032
author Till Ittermann
Sabine Kaczmarek
Anne Obst
Raik Könemann
Martin Bahls
Marcus Dörr
Beate Stubbe
Alexander Heine
Dirk Habedank
Ralf Ewert
author_facet Till Ittermann
Sabine Kaczmarek
Anne Obst
Raik Könemann
Martin Bahls
Marcus Dörr
Beate Stubbe
Alexander Heine
Dirk Habedank
Ralf Ewert
author_sort Till Ittermann
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Recently, the parameter internal work (IW) has been introduced as change in oxygen uptake (VO2) between resting and unloading workload in cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). The proportional IW (PIW) was defined as IW divided by VO2 at peak exercise. A second option is to calculate the PIW based on the workload [PIW (Watt)] by considering the aerobic efficiency. The aim of our study was to investigate whether IW and PIW differ between patients with and without pulmonary hypertension and healthy controls. Our study population consisted of 580 patients and 354 healthy controls derived from the Study of Health in Pomerania. The PIW was slightly lower in patients (14.2%) than in healthy controls (14.9%; p = 0.030), but the PIW (Watt) was higher in patients (18.0%) than in the healthy controls (15.9%; p = 0.001). Such a difference was also observed, when considering only the submaximal workload up to the VAT (19.8% in patients and 15.1% in healthy controls; p < 0.001). Since the PIW (Watt) values were higher in patients with pulmonary hypertension, this marker may serve as a useful CPET parameter in clinical practice. In contrast to most of the currently used CPET parameters, the PIW does not require a maximal workload for the patient. Further studies are needed to validate the prognostic significance of the PIW.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T15:01:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-63bd9cc212ba42329744dd7f7490a93d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T15:01:19Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-63bd9cc212ba42329744dd7f7490a93d2024-03-05T19:08:30ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222024-03-011411910.1038/s41598-024-55980-zMetabolic cost of unloading pedalling in different groups of patients with pulmonary hypertension and volunteersTill Ittermann0Sabine Kaczmarek1Anne Obst2Raik Könemann3Martin Bahls4Marcus Dörr5Beate Stubbe6Alexander Heine7Dirk Habedank8Ralf Ewert9Institute for Community Medicine - SHIP Clinical-Epidemiological Research, University Medicine GreifswaldGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site GreifswaldDepartment of Internal Medicine B, University Medicine GreifswaldDepartment of Internal Medicine B, University Medicine GreifswaldGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site GreifswaldGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site GreifswaldDepartment of Internal Medicine B, University Medicine GreifswaldDepartment of Internal Medicine B, University Medicine GreifswaldDepartment of Internal Medicine, DRK Krankenhaus BerlinDepartment of Internal Medicine B, University Medicine GreifswaldAbstract Recently, the parameter internal work (IW) has been introduced as change in oxygen uptake (VO2) between resting and unloading workload in cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). The proportional IW (PIW) was defined as IW divided by VO2 at peak exercise. A second option is to calculate the PIW based on the workload [PIW (Watt)] by considering the aerobic efficiency. The aim of our study was to investigate whether IW and PIW differ between patients with and without pulmonary hypertension and healthy controls. Our study population consisted of 580 patients and 354 healthy controls derived from the Study of Health in Pomerania. The PIW was slightly lower in patients (14.2%) than in healthy controls (14.9%; p = 0.030), but the PIW (Watt) was higher in patients (18.0%) than in the healthy controls (15.9%; p = 0.001). Such a difference was also observed, when considering only the submaximal workload up to the VAT (19.8% in patients and 15.1% in healthy controls; p < 0.001). Since the PIW (Watt) values were higher in patients with pulmonary hypertension, this marker may serve as a useful CPET parameter in clinical practice. In contrast to most of the currently used CPET parameters, the PIW does not require a maximal workload for the patient. Further studies are needed to validate the prognostic significance of the PIW.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55980-z
spellingShingle Till Ittermann
Sabine Kaczmarek
Anne Obst
Raik Könemann
Martin Bahls
Marcus Dörr
Beate Stubbe
Alexander Heine
Dirk Habedank
Ralf Ewert
Metabolic cost of unloading pedalling in different groups of patients with pulmonary hypertension and volunteers
Scientific Reports
title Metabolic cost of unloading pedalling in different groups of patients with pulmonary hypertension and volunteers
title_full Metabolic cost of unloading pedalling in different groups of patients with pulmonary hypertension and volunteers
title_fullStr Metabolic cost of unloading pedalling in different groups of patients with pulmonary hypertension and volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Metabolic cost of unloading pedalling in different groups of patients with pulmonary hypertension and volunteers
title_short Metabolic cost of unloading pedalling in different groups of patients with pulmonary hypertension and volunteers
title_sort metabolic cost of unloading pedalling in different groups of patients with pulmonary hypertension and volunteers
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55980-z
work_keys_str_mv AT tillittermann metaboliccostofunloadingpedallingindifferentgroupsofpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionandvolunteers
AT sabinekaczmarek metaboliccostofunloadingpedallingindifferentgroupsofpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionandvolunteers
AT anneobst metaboliccostofunloadingpedallingindifferentgroupsofpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionandvolunteers
AT raikkonemann metaboliccostofunloadingpedallingindifferentgroupsofpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionandvolunteers
AT martinbahls metaboliccostofunloadingpedallingindifferentgroupsofpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionandvolunteers
AT marcusdorr metaboliccostofunloadingpedallingindifferentgroupsofpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionandvolunteers
AT beatestubbe metaboliccostofunloadingpedallingindifferentgroupsofpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionandvolunteers
AT alexanderheine metaboliccostofunloadingpedallingindifferentgroupsofpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionandvolunteers
AT dirkhabedank metaboliccostofunloadingpedallingindifferentgroupsofpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionandvolunteers
AT ralfewert metaboliccostofunloadingpedallingindifferentgroupsofpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionandvolunteers