Comparison of Coverage-Prediction Models for Modern Mobile Radio Networks

The accurate prediction of a signal’s attenuation is essential for the development of reliable, modern, mobile radio-communication networks. In this study, the accuracies of four propagation models in diverse terrains and environments were analyzed using field measurements along a comprehensive test...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tomi Mlinar, Urban Podgrajšek, Boštjan Batagelj
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-11-01
Series:Electronics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/12/22/4554
_version_ 1797459534451572736
author Tomi Mlinar
Urban Podgrajšek
Boštjan Batagelj
author_facet Tomi Mlinar
Urban Podgrajšek
Boštjan Batagelj
author_sort Tomi Mlinar
collection DOAJ
description The accurate prediction of a signal’s attenuation is essential for the development of reliable, modern, mobile radio-communication networks. In this study, the accuracies of four propagation models in diverse terrains and environments were analyzed using field measurements along a comprehensive test route. We evaluated the ability of the models—Egli, Okumura, Hata–Davidson, and Longley–Rice—to predict signal propagation in the Very-High-Frequency (VHF) and Ultra-High-Frequency (UHF) bands. Based on a meticulous comparison, we present valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of these models, enhancing coverage-prediction methodologies for evolving mobile radio networks. The Egli model, despite its simplicity, introduces significant inaccuracies due to its assumptions and a lack of consideration for the terrain. The Okumura model, which is widely used in urban areas, requires careful correction selection, while the Hata–Davidson model improves upon the former’s weaknesses. The Longley–Rice model excels in flexibility and accuracy, especially in the VHF bands, using topographical data, though it can overestimate the attenuation in shadowed areas. The study concluded that no single model was universally accurate, as each model has its strengths and limitations. It highlights the need for informed model selection based on the terrain’s characteristics and specific requirements. The results will be useful to network planners, helping them to design efficient, mobile communication networks with reliable coverage and optimal spectrum utilization. The Longley–Rice model emerged as particularly powerful, offering detailed predictions across diverse environments.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T16:52:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-63d438c76d9e45a6be17d73eae959677
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-9292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T16:52:45Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Electronics
spelling doaj.art-63d438c76d9e45a6be17d73eae9596772023-11-24T14:38:57ZengMDPI AGElectronics2079-92922023-11-011222455410.3390/electronics12224554Comparison of Coverage-Prediction Models for Modern Mobile Radio NetworksTomi Mlinar0Urban Podgrajšek1Boštjan Batagelj2Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Tržaška cesta 25, 1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaFaculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Tržaška cesta 25, 1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaFaculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Tržaška cesta 25, 1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaThe accurate prediction of a signal’s attenuation is essential for the development of reliable, modern, mobile radio-communication networks. In this study, the accuracies of four propagation models in diverse terrains and environments were analyzed using field measurements along a comprehensive test route. We evaluated the ability of the models—Egli, Okumura, Hata–Davidson, and Longley–Rice—to predict signal propagation in the Very-High-Frequency (VHF) and Ultra-High-Frequency (UHF) bands. Based on a meticulous comparison, we present valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of these models, enhancing coverage-prediction methodologies for evolving mobile radio networks. The Egli model, despite its simplicity, introduces significant inaccuracies due to its assumptions and a lack of consideration for the terrain. The Okumura model, which is widely used in urban areas, requires careful correction selection, while the Hata–Davidson model improves upon the former’s weaknesses. The Longley–Rice model excels in flexibility and accuracy, especially in the VHF bands, using topographical data, though it can overestimate the attenuation in shadowed areas. The study concluded that no single model was universally accurate, as each model has its strengths and limitations. It highlights the need for informed model selection based on the terrain’s characteristics and specific requirements. The results will be useful to network planners, helping them to design efficient, mobile communication networks with reliable coverage and optimal spectrum utilization. The Longley–Rice model emerged as particularly powerful, offering detailed predictions across diverse environments.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/12/22/4554propagation modelVHF and UHF frequency bandsignal attenuationradio waveEgliOkumura
spellingShingle Tomi Mlinar
Urban Podgrajšek
Boštjan Batagelj
Comparison of Coverage-Prediction Models for Modern Mobile Radio Networks
Electronics
propagation model
VHF and UHF frequency band
signal attenuation
radio wave
Egli
Okumura
title Comparison of Coverage-Prediction Models for Modern Mobile Radio Networks
title_full Comparison of Coverage-Prediction Models for Modern Mobile Radio Networks
title_fullStr Comparison of Coverage-Prediction Models for Modern Mobile Radio Networks
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Coverage-Prediction Models for Modern Mobile Radio Networks
title_short Comparison of Coverage-Prediction Models for Modern Mobile Radio Networks
title_sort comparison of coverage prediction models for modern mobile radio networks
topic propagation model
VHF and UHF frequency band
signal attenuation
radio wave
Egli
Okumura
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/12/22/4554
work_keys_str_mv AT tomimlinar comparisonofcoveragepredictionmodelsformodernmobileradionetworks
AT urbanpodgrajsek comparisonofcoveragepredictionmodelsformodernmobileradionetworks
AT bostjanbatagelj comparisonofcoveragepredictionmodelsformodernmobileradionetworks