Comparison of Megavoltage Electron Dosimetry Beams in Radiation Therapy Using Different Protocols

Background: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and American Association of physicist in Medicine (AAPM) have introduced new protocols for dosimetry of electron and photon megavoltage beams and increased them to more than five protocols at the beginning of new decade. Selecting a protocol by m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zahra Jomehzadeh, Ali Jomehzadeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2024-03-01
Series:Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jkmu.kmu.ac.ir/article_92433_108d0de754a4588d4a6ef93de4e46a30.pdf
_version_ 1827310858466754560
author Zahra Jomehzadeh
Ali Jomehzadeh
author_facet Zahra Jomehzadeh
Ali Jomehzadeh
author_sort Zahra Jomehzadeh
collection DOAJ
description Background: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and American Association of physicist in Medicine (AAPM) have introduced new protocols for dosimetry of electron and photon megavoltage beams and increased them to more than five protocols at the beginning of new decade. Selecting a protocol by medical physicists and acquiring skill for using reference conditions and recommended formulation by each protocol necessitate recognition of various dosimetry protocols. The aim of this study was to compare the protocols TRS-277, TRS-381, and TRS-398 of IAEA for megavoltage electron beams used in radiation therapy.Methods: Comparison of TRS-398 with other protocols was done as follows:1. Measurement and estimation of the absorbed dose of 6MeV Neptun 10 linear accelerator through ionization chamber with parallel NACP plates in water phantom and acrylic.2- Measurement of the absorbed dose in 17MeV Saturn 20 linear accelerator through ionization chamber with parallel NACP plates in water phantomResults: The results indicated that the differences observed between the protocols compared to TRS-398 protocol was between -4.9 and 0.2%; the highest difference was related to 17 MeV electron beam using TRS-277 protocol.Conclusions: According to the results, the considerable difference observed in 17MeV electrons was related to TRS-277 and TRS-388 protocols. Given that calibration ratio of the absorbed dose in air is used in the TRS-277 protocol, the difference obtained was related to the application of secondary calibration used in this research.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T20:06:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-63dce9b4fa9e4d1584f03aae7ee5fa54
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1023-9510
2008-2843
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T20:06:42Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-63dce9b4fa9e4d1584f03aae7ee5fa542024-03-24T05:09:53ZengKerman University of Medical SciencesJournal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences1023-95102008-28432024-03-01311172210.34172/jkmu.2024.0392433Comparison of Megavoltage Electron Dosimetry Beams in Radiation Therapy Using Different ProtocolsZahra Jomehzadeh0Ali Jomehzadeh1Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IranDepartment of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IranBackground: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and American Association of physicist in Medicine (AAPM) have introduced new protocols for dosimetry of electron and photon megavoltage beams and increased them to more than five protocols at the beginning of new decade. Selecting a protocol by medical physicists and acquiring skill for using reference conditions and recommended formulation by each protocol necessitate recognition of various dosimetry protocols. The aim of this study was to compare the protocols TRS-277, TRS-381, and TRS-398 of IAEA for megavoltage electron beams used in radiation therapy.Methods: Comparison of TRS-398 with other protocols was done as follows:1. Measurement and estimation of the absorbed dose of 6MeV Neptun 10 linear accelerator through ionization chamber with parallel NACP plates in water phantom and acrylic.2- Measurement of the absorbed dose in 17MeV Saturn 20 linear accelerator through ionization chamber with parallel NACP plates in water phantomResults: The results indicated that the differences observed between the protocols compared to TRS-398 protocol was between -4.9 and 0.2%; the highest difference was related to 17 MeV electron beam using TRS-277 protocol.Conclusions: According to the results, the considerable difference observed in 17MeV electrons was related to TRS-277 and TRS-388 protocols. Given that calibration ratio of the absorbed dose in air is used in the TRS-277 protocol, the difference obtained was related to the application of secondary calibration used in this research.https://jkmu.kmu.ac.ir/article_92433_108d0de754a4588d4a6ef93de4e46a30.pdfdosimetry protocolselectronradiation therapy
spellingShingle Zahra Jomehzadeh
Ali Jomehzadeh
Comparison of Megavoltage Electron Dosimetry Beams in Radiation Therapy Using Different Protocols
Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences
dosimetry protocols
electron
radiation therapy
title Comparison of Megavoltage Electron Dosimetry Beams in Radiation Therapy Using Different Protocols
title_full Comparison of Megavoltage Electron Dosimetry Beams in Radiation Therapy Using Different Protocols
title_fullStr Comparison of Megavoltage Electron Dosimetry Beams in Radiation Therapy Using Different Protocols
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Megavoltage Electron Dosimetry Beams in Radiation Therapy Using Different Protocols
title_short Comparison of Megavoltage Electron Dosimetry Beams in Radiation Therapy Using Different Protocols
title_sort comparison of megavoltage electron dosimetry beams in radiation therapy using different protocols
topic dosimetry protocols
electron
radiation therapy
url https://jkmu.kmu.ac.ir/article_92433_108d0de754a4588d4a6ef93de4e46a30.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT zahrajomehzadeh comparisonofmegavoltageelectrondosimetrybeamsinradiationtherapyusingdifferentprotocols
AT alijomehzadeh comparisonofmegavoltageelectrondosimetrybeamsinradiationtherapyusingdifferentprotocols