The use of remote sensing to quantify wetland loss in the Choke Mountain range, Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia

Wetlands provide multiple ecosystem services such as storing and regulating water flows and water quality, providing unique habitats to flora and fauna, and regulating micro-climatic conditions. Conversion of wetlands for agricultural use is a widespread practice in Ethiopia, particularly in the sou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. Teferi, S. Uhlenbrook, W. Bewket, J. Wenninger, B. Simane
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2010-12-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/14/2415/2010/hess-14-2415-2010.pdf
_version_ 1818937446662930432
author E. Teferi
S. Uhlenbrook
W. Bewket
J. Wenninger
B. Simane
author_facet E. Teferi
S. Uhlenbrook
W. Bewket
J. Wenninger
B. Simane
author_sort E. Teferi
collection DOAJ
description Wetlands provide multiple ecosystem services such as storing and regulating water flows and water quality, providing unique habitats to flora and fauna, and regulating micro-climatic conditions. Conversion of wetlands for agricultural use is a widespread practice in Ethiopia, particularly in the southwestern part where wetlands cover large areas. Although there are many studies on land cover and land use changes in this region, comprehensive studies on wetlands are still missing. Hence, extent and rate of wetland loss at regional scales is unknown. The objective of this paper is to quantify wetland dynamics and estimate wetland loss in the Choke Mountain range (area covering 17 443 km<sup>2</sup>) in the Upper Blue Nile basin, a key headwater region of the river Nile. Therefore, satellite remote sensing imagery of the period 1986–2005 were considered. To create images of surface reflectance that are radiometrically consistent, a combination of cross-calibration and atmospheric correction (Vogelman-DOS3) methods was used. A hybrid supervised/unsupervised classification approach was used to classify the images. Overall accuracies of 94.1% and 93.5% and Kappa Coefficients of 0.908 and 0.913 for the 1986 and 2005 imageries, respectively were obtained. The results showed that 607 km<sup>2</sup> of seasonal wetland with low moisture and 22.4 km<sup>2</sup> of open water are lost in the study area during the period 1986 to 2005. The current situation in the wetlands of Choke Mountain is characterized by further degradation which calls for wetland conservation and rehabilitation efforts through incorporating wetlands into watershed management plans.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T05:52:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6400b601a49344c3b907ced6ac9090a0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T05:52:06Z
publishDate 2010-12-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
spelling doaj.art-6400b601a49344c3b907ced6ac9090a02022-12-21T19:51:09ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382010-12-0114122415242810.5194/hess-14-2415-2010The use of remote sensing to quantify wetland loss in the Choke Mountain range, Upper Blue Nile basin, EthiopiaE. TeferiS. UhlenbrookW. BewketJ. WenningerB. SimaneWetlands provide multiple ecosystem services such as storing and regulating water flows and water quality, providing unique habitats to flora and fauna, and regulating micro-climatic conditions. Conversion of wetlands for agricultural use is a widespread practice in Ethiopia, particularly in the southwestern part where wetlands cover large areas. Although there are many studies on land cover and land use changes in this region, comprehensive studies on wetlands are still missing. Hence, extent and rate of wetland loss at regional scales is unknown. The objective of this paper is to quantify wetland dynamics and estimate wetland loss in the Choke Mountain range (area covering 17 443 km<sup>2</sup>) in the Upper Blue Nile basin, a key headwater region of the river Nile. Therefore, satellite remote sensing imagery of the period 1986–2005 were considered. To create images of surface reflectance that are radiometrically consistent, a combination of cross-calibration and atmospheric correction (Vogelman-DOS3) methods was used. A hybrid supervised/unsupervised classification approach was used to classify the images. Overall accuracies of 94.1% and 93.5% and Kappa Coefficients of 0.908 and 0.913 for the 1986 and 2005 imageries, respectively were obtained. The results showed that 607 km<sup>2</sup> of seasonal wetland with low moisture and 22.4 km<sup>2</sup> of open water are lost in the study area during the period 1986 to 2005. The current situation in the wetlands of Choke Mountain is characterized by further degradation which calls for wetland conservation and rehabilitation efforts through incorporating wetlands into watershed management plans.http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/14/2415/2010/hess-14-2415-2010.pdf
spellingShingle E. Teferi
S. Uhlenbrook
W. Bewket
J. Wenninger
B. Simane
The use of remote sensing to quantify wetland loss in the Choke Mountain range, Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
title The use of remote sensing to quantify wetland loss in the Choke Mountain range, Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia
title_full The use of remote sensing to quantify wetland loss in the Choke Mountain range, Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia
title_fullStr The use of remote sensing to quantify wetland loss in the Choke Mountain range, Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed The use of remote sensing to quantify wetland loss in the Choke Mountain range, Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia
title_short The use of remote sensing to quantify wetland loss in the Choke Mountain range, Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia
title_sort use of remote sensing to quantify wetland loss in the choke mountain range upper blue nile basin ethiopia
url http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/14/2415/2010/hess-14-2415-2010.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT eteferi theuseofremotesensingtoquantifywetlandlossinthechokemountainrangeupperbluenilebasinethiopia
AT suhlenbrook theuseofremotesensingtoquantifywetlandlossinthechokemountainrangeupperbluenilebasinethiopia
AT wbewket theuseofremotesensingtoquantifywetlandlossinthechokemountainrangeupperbluenilebasinethiopia
AT jwenninger theuseofremotesensingtoquantifywetlandlossinthechokemountainrangeupperbluenilebasinethiopia
AT bsimane theuseofremotesensingtoquantifywetlandlossinthechokemountainrangeupperbluenilebasinethiopia
AT eteferi useofremotesensingtoquantifywetlandlossinthechokemountainrangeupperbluenilebasinethiopia
AT suhlenbrook useofremotesensingtoquantifywetlandlossinthechokemountainrangeupperbluenilebasinethiopia
AT wbewket useofremotesensingtoquantifywetlandlossinthechokemountainrangeupperbluenilebasinethiopia
AT jwenninger useofremotesensingtoquantifywetlandlossinthechokemountainrangeupperbluenilebasinethiopia
AT bsimane useofremotesensingtoquantifywetlandlossinthechokemountainrangeupperbluenilebasinethiopia