Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound in a Tertiary Medical Intensive Care Unit

Objective:. Critical care echocardiography (CCE) is a useful tool for managing critically ill patients in intensive care. However, concerns exist regarding the accuracy of CCE examinations because of operator dependence. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of CCE examinations compared with cardiology...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Steven Fox, MD, Mahmoud Alwakeel, MD, Xiaofeng Wang, PhD, Siddharth Dugar, MD, Neal Chaisson, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2023-12-01
Series:Critical Care Explorations
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001019
_version_ 1797375041010139136
author Steven Fox, MD
Mahmoud Alwakeel, MD
Xiaofeng Wang, PhD
Siddharth Dugar, MD
Neal Chaisson, MD
author_facet Steven Fox, MD
Mahmoud Alwakeel, MD
Xiaofeng Wang, PhD
Siddharth Dugar, MD
Neal Chaisson, MD
author_sort Steven Fox, MD
collection DOAJ
description Objective:. Critical care echocardiography (CCE) is a useful tool for managing critically ill patients in intensive care. However, concerns exist regarding the accuracy of CCE examinations because of operator dependence. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of CCE examinations compared with cardiology-performed transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). Design, Setting, and Subjects:. We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients in a medical ICU in a large academic medical center in the United States. We compared CCE examinations performed by a fellow and reviewed by a staff physician between May 5, 2020, and December 31, 2021, to TTE obtained within 24 hours of the CCE examination. Intervention, Measurements, and Main Results:. We developed a standardized process for documentation of all CCE examinations performed in the medical ICU. We assessed agreement (kappa statistic), sensitivity and specificity of CCE examination compared with TTE. Features included left ventricle (LV) systolic function, right ventricle (RV) size, RV systolic function, pericardial effusion, mitral insufficiency, tricuspid insufficiency, and aortic insufficiency. The study analyzed 504 pairs of CCE and TTE examinations. Kappa statistics for detecting LV and RV systolic dysfunction, pericardial effusion, and RV size ranged from 0.60 to 0.74. CCE showed high sensitivity and specificity for detecting LV and RV systolic dysfunction and pericardial effusion, with values ranging from 0.85 to 0.99. The kappa statistic for detecting RV dilation was 0.59, with a sensitivity of 0.71 and a specificity of 0.85. In contrast, CCE examinations were nondiagnostic for mitral, tricuspid, or aortic insufficiency in 60–70% of cases, whereas TTE examinations were nondiagnostic in 20–30% of cases. Kappa statistics for mitral, tricuspid, and aortic insufficiency ranged from 0.32 to 0.42. Conclusions:. CCE is a reliable tool for assessing LV and RV systolic function, pericardial effusion, and RV size. However, CCE may be limited in its ability to detect mitral, tricuspid, or aortic insufficiency.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:16:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-642ee6f74201481dba1ca5f2db2e42ee
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2639-8028
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:16:28Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series Critical Care Explorations
spelling doaj.art-642ee6f74201481dba1ca5f2db2e42ee2023-12-27T06:49:38ZengWolters KluwerCritical Care Explorations2639-80282023-12-01512e101910.1097/CCE.0000000000001019202312000-00015Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound in a Tertiary Medical Intensive Care UnitSteven Fox, MD0Mahmoud Alwakeel, MD1Xiaofeng Wang, PhD2Siddharth Dugar, MD3Neal Chaisson, MD41 Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.1 Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.2 Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.1 Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.1 Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.Objective:. Critical care echocardiography (CCE) is a useful tool for managing critically ill patients in intensive care. However, concerns exist regarding the accuracy of CCE examinations because of operator dependence. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of CCE examinations compared with cardiology-performed transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). Design, Setting, and Subjects:. We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients in a medical ICU in a large academic medical center in the United States. We compared CCE examinations performed by a fellow and reviewed by a staff physician between May 5, 2020, and December 31, 2021, to TTE obtained within 24 hours of the CCE examination. Intervention, Measurements, and Main Results:. We developed a standardized process for documentation of all CCE examinations performed in the medical ICU. We assessed agreement (kappa statistic), sensitivity and specificity of CCE examination compared with TTE. Features included left ventricle (LV) systolic function, right ventricle (RV) size, RV systolic function, pericardial effusion, mitral insufficiency, tricuspid insufficiency, and aortic insufficiency. The study analyzed 504 pairs of CCE and TTE examinations. Kappa statistics for detecting LV and RV systolic dysfunction, pericardial effusion, and RV size ranged from 0.60 to 0.74. CCE showed high sensitivity and specificity for detecting LV and RV systolic dysfunction and pericardial effusion, with values ranging from 0.85 to 0.99. The kappa statistic for detecting RV dilation was 0.59, with a sensitivity of 0.71 and a specificity of 0.85. In contrast, CCE examinations were nondiagnostic for mitral, tricuspid, or aortic insufficiency in 60–70% of cases, whereas TTE examinations were nondiagnostic in 20–30% of cases. Kappa statistics for mitral, tricuspid, and aortic insufficiency ranged from 0.32 to 0.42. Conclusions:. CCE is a reliable tool for assessing LV and RV systolic function, pericardial effusion, and RV size. However, CCE may be limited in its ability to detect mitral, tricuspid, or aortic insufficiency.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001019
spellingShingle Steven Fox, MD
Mahmoud Alwakeel, MD
Xiaofeng Wang, PhD
Siddharth Dugar, MD
Neal Chaisson, MD
Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound in a Tertiary Medical Intensive Care Unit
Critical Care Explorations
title Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound in a Tertiary Medical Intensive Care Unit
title_full Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound in a Tertiary Medical Intensive Care Unit
title_fullStr Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound in a Tertiary Medical Intensive Care Unit
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound in a Tertiary Medical Intensive Care Unit
title_short Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound in a Tertiary Medical Intensive Care Unit
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of cardiac point of care ultrasound in a tertiary medical intensive care unit
url http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001019
work_keys_str_mv AT stevenfoxmd diagnosticaccuracyofcardiacpointofcareultrasoundinatertiarymedicalintensivecareunit
AT mahmoudalwakeelmd diagnosticaccuracyofcardiacpointofcareultrasoundinatertiarymedicalintensivecareunit
AT xiaofengwangphd diagnosticaccuracyofcardiacpointofcareultrasoundinatertiarymedicalintensivecareunit
AT siddharthdugarmd diagnosticaccuracyofcardiacpointofcareultrasoundinatertiarymedicalintensivecareunit
AT nealchaissonmd diagnosticaccuracyofcardiacpointofcareultrasoundinatertiarymedicalintensivecareunit