Comment on ‘Does replacing coal with wood lower CO2 emissions? Dynamic lifecycle analysis of wood bioenergy’

An analysis by Sterman et al (2018 Environ. Res. Lett. 13 015007) suggests that use of wood for bioenergy production results in a worse climate outcome than from using coal. However, many of the assumptions on which their primary wood bioenergy scenario is based are not realistic and therefore are n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephen P Prisley, Caroline Gaudreault, Patrick Lamers, William Stewart, Reid Miner, H M Junginger, Elaine Oneil, Robert Malmsheimer, Timothy A Volk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2018-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf203
_version_ 1797748139391713280
author Stephen P Prisley
Caroline Gaudreault
Patrick Lamers
William Stewart
Reid Miner
H M Junginger
Elaine Oneil
Robert Malmsheimer
Timothy A Volk
author_facet Stephen P Prisley
Caroline Gaudreault
Patrick Lamers
William Stewart
Reid Miner
H M Junginger
Elaine Oneil
Robert Malmsheimer
Timothy A Volk
author_sort Stephen P Prisley
collection DOAJ
description An analysis by Sterman et al (2018 Environ. Res. Lett. 13 015007) suggests that use of wood for bioenergy production results in a worse climate outcome than from using coal. However, many of the assumptions on which their primary wood bioenergy scenario is based are not realistic and therefore are not informative. Assumptions of uncharacteristically long rotations for southern pine plantations, no utilization of wood for longer-duration products, and a single harvest over 100 years understate the carbon performance of current forest management practices. We provide references that support realistic modeling of forest carbon dynamics that are reflective of current practice and therefore more informative.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T16:00:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-64364e2316754682bfef9a9cb6901d4b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T16:00:36Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-64364e2316754682bfef9a9cb6901d4b2023-08-09T14:39:21ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262018-01-01131212800210.1088/1748-9326/aaf203Comment on ‘Does replacing coal with wood lower CO2 emissions? Dynamic lifecycle analysis of wood bioenergy’Stephen P Prisley0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7393-7879Caroline Gaudreault1Patrick Lamers2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8142-5024William Stewart3Reid Miner4H M Junginger5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5010-2051Elaine Oneil6Robert Malmsheimer7Timothy A Volk8Principal Research Scientist, NCASI, 541 Washington Ave SW, Roanoke, VA 24016, United States of AmericaProgram Manager- Sustainable Manufacturing and Climate, NCASI, 1010 Sherbrooke Street West, Suite 1800, Montreal, QC H3A 2R7, CanadaSystems Level Analysis Lead, National Renewable Energy Laboratory,15013 Denver W Pkwy, Golden, CO 80401, United States of AmericaForestry Specialist, Co-Director, Berkeley Forests, University of California , Berkeley, 130 Mulford Hall, MC #3114, Berkeley, CA 94720-3114, United States of AmericaSenior Fellow, NCASI, 1513 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Cary, NC 27511, United States of AmericaProfessor Bio-Based Economy, Utrecht University , Vening Meinesz building 8.94, Princetonlaan 8a, 3584 CB Utrecht (NL), NetherlandsDirector of Science and Sustainability, CORRIM -The Consortium for Research on Renewable Industrial Materials, PO Box 2432, Corvalis, OR 97339-2432, United States of AmericaProfessor of Forest Policy and Law, Department of Forest and Natural Resources Management, SUNY ESF, 305 Bray Hall; One Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States of AmericaSenior Research Associate, Department of Forest and Natural Resources Management, SUNY ESF, 346 Illick Hall; One Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States of AmericaAn analysis by Sterman et al (2018 Environ. Res. Lett. 13 015007) suggests that use of wood for bioenergy production results in a worse climate outcome than from using coal. However, many of the assumptions on which their primary wood bioenergy scenario is based are not realistic and therefore are not informative. Assumptions of uncharacteristically long rotations for southern pine plantations, no utilization of wood for longer-duration products, and a single harvest over 100 years understate the carbon performance of current forest management practices. We provide references that support realistic modeling of forest carbon dynamics that are reflective of current practice and therefore more informative.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf203biomass energyforest managementCO2 emissions
spellingShingle Stephen P Prisley
Caroline Gaudreault
Patrick Lamers
William Stewart
Reid Miner
H M Junginger
Elaine Oneil
Robert Malmsheimer
Timothy A Volk
Comment on ‘Does replacing coal with wood lower CO2 emissions? Dynamic lifecycle analysis of wood bioenergy’
Environmental Research Letters
biomass energy
forest management
CO2 emissions
title Comment on ‘Does replacing coal with wood lower CO2 emissions? Dynamic lifecycle analysis of wood bioenergy’
title_full Comment on ‘Does replacing coal with wood lower CO2 emissions? Dynamic lifecycle analysis of wood bioenergy’
title_fullStr Comment on ‘Does replacing coal with wood lower CO2 emissions? Dynamic lifecycle analysis of wood bioenergy’
title_full_unstemmed Comment on ‘Does replacing coal with wood lower CO2 emissions? Dynamic lifecycle analysis of wood bioenergy’
title_short Comment on ‘Does replacing coal with wood lower CO2 emissions? Dynamic lifecycle analysis of wood bioenergy’
title_sort comment on does replacing coal with wood lower co2 emissions dynamic lifecycle analysis of wood bioenergy
topic biomass energy
forest management
CO2 emissions
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf203
work_keys_str_mv AT stephenpprisley commentondoesreplacingcoalwithwoodlowerco2emissionsdynamiclifecycleanalysisofwoodbioenergy
AT carolinegaudreault commentondoesreplacingcoalwithwoodlowerco2emissionsdynamiclifecycleanalysisofwoodbioenergy
AT patricklamers commentondoesreplacingcoalwithwoodlowerco2emissionsdynamiclifecycleanalysisofwoodbioenergy
AT williamstewart commentondoesreplacingcoalwithwoodlowerco2emissionsdynamiclifecycleanalysisofwoodbioenergy
AT reidminer commentondoesreplacingcoalwithwoodlowerco2emissionsdynamiclifecycleanalysisofwoodbioenergy
AT hmjunginger commentondoesreplacingcoalwithwoodlowerco2emissionsdynamiclifecycleanalysisofwoodbioenergy
AT elaineoneil commentondoesreplacingcoalwithwoodlowerco2emissionsdynamiclifecycleanalysisofwoodbioenergy
AT robertmalmsheimer commentondoesreplacingcoalwithwoodlowerco2emissionsdynamiclifecycleanalysisofwoodbioenergy
AT timothyavolk commentondoesreplacingcoalwithwoodlowerco2emissionsdynamiclifecycleanalysisofwoodbioenergy