The natural history of sound localization in mammals – a story of neuronal inhibition
Our concepts of sound localization in the vertebrate brain are widely based on the general assumption that both the ability to detect air-borne sounds and the neuronal processing are homologous in archosaurs (present day crocodiles and birds) and mammals. Yet studies repeatedly report conflicting re...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014-10-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Neural Circuits |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncir.2014.00116/full |
_version_ | 1811224714539958272 |
---|---|
author | Benedikt eGrothe Michael ePecka |
author_facet | Benedikt eGrothe Michael ePecka |
author_sort | Benedikt eGrothe |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Our concepts of sound localization in the vertebrate brain are widely based on the general assumption that both the ability to detect air-borne sounds and the neuronal processing are homologous in archosaurs (present day crocodiles and birds) and mammals. Yet studies repeatedly report conflicting results on the neuronal circuits and mechanisms, in particular the role of inhibition, as well as the coding strategies between avian and mammalian model systems.Here we argue that mammalian and avian phylogeny of spatial hearing is characterized by a convergent evolution of hearing air-borne sounds rather than by homology. In particular, the different evolutionary origins of tympanic ears and the different availability of binaural cues in early mammals and archosaurs imposed distinct constraints on the respective binaural processing mechanisms. The role of synaptic inhibition in generating binaural spatial sensitivity in mammals is highlighted, as it reveals a unifying principle of mammalian circuit design for encoding sound position. Together, we combine evolutionary, anatomical and physiological arguments for making a clear distinction between mammalian processing mechanisms and coding strategies and those of archosaurs. We emphasize that a consideration of the convergent nature of neuronal mechanisms will significantly increase the explanatory power of studies of spatial processing in both mammals and birds. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T08:53:55Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-64367d653b3342a1bcd1a1f0236e5c6f |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1662-5110 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T08:53:55Z |
publishDate | 2014-10-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Neural Circuits |
spelling | doaj.art-64367d653b3342a1bcd1a1f0236e5c6f2022-12-22T03:39:29ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neural Circuits1662-51102014-10-01810.3389/fncir.2014.00116109960The natural history of sound localization in mammals – a story of neuronal inhibitionBenedikt eGrothe0Michael ePecka1Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Biocenter Dept. II, NeurobiologyLudwig-Maximilians University Munich, Biocenter Dept. II, NeurobiologyOur concepts of sound localization in the vertebrate brain are widely based on the general assumption that both the ability to detect air-borne sounds and the neuronal processing are homologous in archosaurs (present day crocodiles and birds) and mammals. Yet studies repeatedly report conflicting results on the neuronal circuits and mechanisms, in particular the role of inhibition, as well as the coding strategies between avian and mammalian model systems.Here we argue that mammalian and avian phylogeny of spatial hearing is characterized by a convergent evolution of hearing air-borne sounds rather than by homology. In particular, the different evolutionary origins of tympanic ears and the different availability of binaural cues in early mammals and archosaurs imposed distinct constraints on the respective binaural processing mechanisms. The role of synaptic inhibition in generating binaural spatial sensitivity in mammals is highlighted, as it reveals a unifying principle of mammalian circuit design for encoding sound position. Together, we combine evolutionary, anatomical and physiological arguments for making a clear distinction between mammalian processing mechanisms and coding strategies and those of archosaurs. We emphasize that a consideration of the convergent nature of neuronal mechanisms will significantly increase the explanatory power of studies of spatial processing in both mammals and birds.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncir.2014.00116/fullBirdsGlycineMammalsevolutionGABAneuronal circuits |
spellingShingle | Benedikt eGrothe Michael ePecka The natural history of sound localization in mammals – a story of neuronal inhibition Frontiers in Neural Circuits Birds Glycine Mammals evolution GABA neuronal circuits |
title | The natural history of sound localization in mammals – a story of neuronal inhibition |
title_full | The natural history of sound localization in mammals – a story of neuronal inhibition |
title_fullStr | The natural history of sound localization in mammals – a story of neuronal inhibition |
title_full_unstemmed | The natural history of sound localization in mammals – a story of neuronal inhibition |
title_short | The natural history of sound localization in mammals – a story of neuronal inhibition |
title_sort | natural history of sound localization in mammals a story of neuronal inhibition |
topic | Birds Glycine Mammals evolution GABA neuronal circuits |
url | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncir.2014.00116/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benediktegrothe thenaturalhistoryofsoundlocalizationinmammalsastoryofneuronalinhibition AT michaelepecka thenaturalhistoryofsoundlocalizationinmammalsastoryofneuronalinhibition AT benediktegrothe naturalhistoryofsoundlocalizationinmammalsastoryofneuronalinhibition AT michaelepecka naturalhistoryofsoundlocalizationinmammalsastoryofneuronalinhibition |