Effects of fixed functional devices on patients’ oral health-related quality of life

Objective: To determine treatment expectations of patients and parents, and the initial effects of fixed functional devices on oral health-related quality of life. Materials and Method: The study comprised 50 patients (39 female, 11 male, mean age 16.24 years) with Angle Class II,1 malocclusion, wh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fatma Tekin, Burcu Baloş Tuncer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Gazi University 2022-09-01
Series:Acta Odontologica Turcica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1921299
_version_ 1797919095003283456
author Fatma Tekin
Burcu Baloş Tuncer
author_facet Fatma Tekin
Burcu Baloş Tuncer
author_sort Fatma Tekin
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To determine treatment expectations of patients and parents, and the initial effects of fixed functional devices on oral health-related quality of life. Materials and Method: The study comprised 50 patients (39 female, 11 male, mean age 16.24 years) with Angle Class II,1 malocclusion, who were planned to be treated with forsus fatigue resistant device (FFRD). Treatment expectations of the patients and their parents/legal guardians were assessed before the treatment. The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) was assessed 1-month after bonding (T1), and repeated 1-month after placement of FFRD (T2). Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon Signed Rank test for the evaluation of the differences in scores between treatment periods and Mann-Whitney U test for the evaluation of gender differences. Results: Main motivation for seeking orthodontic treatment was to improve dental appearance for the patients, and facial esthetics for their parents. Results declared that girls took their orthodontic problems more seriously than boys (p<0.05). The highest mean scores in OHIP-14 were achieved for “difficulty in eating”, and “feeling pain”. No significant difference between treatment periods was noted. Conclusion: This study highlighted the lack of serious adverse effects of the use of fixed functional devices on patients’ quality of life, and that patients might probably experience problems about physical status, mainly for functional limitations, rather than psychological status and social interactions. The findings may assist clinicians in understanding the concerns about these appliances.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T13:40:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-644742cc96784987bc3810a275cd9043
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2147-690X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T13:40:08Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Gazi University
record_format Article
series Acta Odontologica Turcica
spelling doaj.art-644742cc96784987bc3810a275cd90432023-02-15T16:11:12ZengGazi UniversityActa Odontologica Turcica2147-690X2022-09-01393525710.17214/gaziaot.98194729Effects of fixed functional devices on patients’ oral health-related quality of lifeFatma TekinBurcu Baloş Tuncer0GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ PR.Objective: To determine treatment expectations of patients and parents, and the initial effects of fixed functional devices on oral health-related quality of life. Materials and Method: The study comprised 50 patients (39 female, 11 male, mean age 16.24 years) with Angle Class II,1 malocclusion, who were planned to be treated with forsus fatigue resistant device (FFRD). Treatment expectations of the patients and their parents/legal guardians were assessed before the treatment. The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) was assessed 1-month after bonding (T1), and repeated 1-month after placement of FFRD (T2). Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon Signed Rank test for the evaluation of the differences in scores between treatment periods and Mann-Whitney U test for the evaluation of gender differences. Results: Main motivation for seeking orthodontic treatment was to improve dental appearance for the patients, and facial esthetics for their parents. Results declared that girls took their orthodontic problems more seriously than boys (p<0.05). The highest mean scores in OHIP-14 were achieved for “difficulty in eating”, and “feeling pain”. No significant difference between treatment periods was noted. Conclusion: This study highlighted the lack of serious adverse effects of the use of fixed functional devices on patients’ quality of life, and that patients might probably experience problems about physical status, mainly for functional limitations, rather than psychological status and social interactions. The findings may assist clinicians in understanding the concerns about these appliances.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1921299orthodonticsorthodontic appliancesfunctionalquality of lifeortodontiortodontik aletlerfonksiyonelyaşam kalitesi
spellingShingle Fatma Tekin
Burcu Baloş Tuncer
Effects of fixed functional devices on patients’ oral health-related quality of life
Acta Odontologica Turcica
orthodontics
orthodontic appliances
functional
quality of life
ortodonti
ortodontik aletler
fonksiyonel
yaşam kalitesi
title Effects of fixed functional devices on patients’ oral health-related quality of life
title_full Effects of fixed functional devices on patients’ oral health-related quality of life
title_fullStr Effects of fixed functional devices on patients’ oral health-related quality of life
title_full_unstemmed Effects of fixed functional devices on patients’ oral health-related quality of life
title_short Effects of fixed functional devices on patients’ oral health-related quality of life
title_sort effects of fixed functional devices on patients oral health related quality of life
topic orthodontics
orthodontic appliances
functional
quality of life
ortodonti
ortodontik aletler
fonksiyonel
yaşam kalitesi
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1921299
work_keys_str_mv AT fatmatekin effectsoffixedfunctionaldevicesonpatientsoralhealthrelatedqualityoflife
AT burcubalostuncer effectsoffixedfunctionaldevicesonpatientsoralhealthrelatedqualityoflife