Shear Behavior of Geopolymer Concrete Slender Beams

This study investigates the shear behavior of slender steel-reinforced geopolymer concrete (GPC) beams with the shear span to effective depth ratio (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi&g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhammad Tauqir, Asad Ullah Qazi, Qasim S. Khan, Muhammad Junaid Munir, Syed Minhaj Saleem Kazmi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-04-01
Series:Buildings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/5/1191
_version_ 1797600775978876928
author Muhammad Tauqir
Asad Ullah Qazi
Qasim S. Khan
Muhammad Junaid Munir
Syed Minhaj Saleem Kazmi
author_facet Muhammad Tauqir
Asad Ullah Qazi
Qasim S. Khan
Muhammad Junaid Munir
Syed Minhaj Saleem Kazmi
author_sort Muhammad Tauqir
collection DOAJ
description This study investigates the shear behavior of slender steel-reinforced geopolymer concrete (GPC) beams with the shear span to effective depth ratio (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>a</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>d</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>) of 4.5 and 5.0. To investigate the effect of shear reinforcement, two ordinary Portland cement concrete (OPC) beams and two GPC beams without shear reinforcement, and two OPC beams and two GPC beams reinforced with shear stirrups were cast. All beams were 150 mm wide and 225 mm deep with lengths of 1770 mm (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>a</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>d</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>4.5</mn></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>) and 1950 mm (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>a</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>d</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>5</mn></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>). The beams were tested under a three-point bending test. The experimental results showed that OPC and GPC beams without and with shear reinforcements exhibited similar crack propagation and failure mechanism. The midspan deflections of GPC beams were greater than OPC beams. The normalized shear resistance of OPC and GPC beams with <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>a</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>d</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> ratio 4.5 was greater than 4% and 30%, respectively, than beams with <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>a</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>d</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> ratio 5. OPC beams showed a greater decrease in shear resistance with an increasing <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>a</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>d</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> ratio compared to GPC beams. The shear resistances computed using empirical relationships available in various OPC design codes including AC1-318-14, AC1-318-19, fib-10 and JSCE-07 underestimated the experimental shear resistance of both OPC and GPC beams. In addition, the environmental assessment of OPC and GPC beams exhibited that GPC beams emit about 34% lower embodied CO<sub>2</sub> emissions than OPC beams.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T03:52:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6453793e1b0849ff90563305f8259ebb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-5309
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T03:52:42Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Buildings
spelling doaj.art-6453793e1b0849ff90563305f8259ebb2023-11-18T00:44:50ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092023-04-01135119110.3390/buildings13051191Shear Behavior of Geopolymer Concrete Slender BeamsMuhammad Tauqir0Asad Ullah Qazi1Qasim S. Khan2Muhammad Junaid Munir3Syed Minhaj Saleem Kazmi4Civil Engineering Department, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54890, Punjab, PakistanCivil Engineering Department, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54890, Punjab, PakistanCivil Engineering Department, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54890, Punjab, PakistanSchool of Engineering, RMIT University, 376-392 Swanston Street, Melbourne, VIC 3001, AustraliaSchool of Engineering, RMIT University, 376-392 Swanston Street, Melbourne, VIC 3001, AustraliaThis study investigates the shear behavior of slender steel-reinforced geopolymer concrete (GPC) beams with the shear span to effective depth ratio (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>a</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>d</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>) of 4.5 and 5.0. To investigate the effect of shear reinforcement, two ordinary Portland cement concrete (OPC) beams and two GPC beams without shear reinforcement, and two OPC beams and two GPC beams reinforced with shear stirrups were cast. All beams were 150 mm wide and 225 mm deep with lengths of 1770 mm (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>a</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>d</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>4.5</mn></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>) and 1950 mm (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>a</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>d</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>5</mn></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>). The beams were tested under a three-point bending test. The experimental results showed that OPC and GPC beams without and with shear reinforcements exhibited similar crack propagation and failure mechanism. The midspan deflections of GPC beams were greater than OPC beams. The normalized shear resistance of OPC and GPC beams with <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>a</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>d</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> ratio 4.5 was greater than 4% and 30%, respectively, than beams with <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>a</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>d</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> ratio 5. OPC beams showed a greater decrease in shear resistance with an increasing <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>a</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>d</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> ratio compared to GPC beams. The shear resistances computed using empirical relationships available in various OPC design codes including AC1-318-14, AC1-318-19, fib-10 and JSCE-07 underestimated the experimental shear resistance of both OPC and GPC beams. In addition, the environmental assessment of OPC and GPC beams exhibited that GPC beams emit about 34% lower embodied CO<sub>2</sub> emissions than OPC beams.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/5/1191geopolymer concreteshear behaviorshear spanslender beamsestimated shear resistance
spellingShingle Muhammad Tauqir
Asad Ullah Qazi
Qasim S. Khan
Muhammad Junaid Munir
Syed Minhaj Saleem Kazmi
Shear Behavior of Geopolymer Concrete Slender Beams
Buildings
geopolymer concrete
shear behavior
shear span
slender beams
estimated shear resistance
title Shear Behavior of Geopolymer Concrete Slender Beams
title_full Shear Behavior of Geopolymer Concrete Slender Beams
title_fullStr Shear Behavior of Geopolymer Concrete Slender Beams
title_full_unstemmed Shear Behavior of Geopolymer Concrete Slender Beams
title_short Shear Behavior of Geopolymer Concrete Slender Beams
title_sort shear behavior of geopolymer concrete slender beams
topic geopolymer concrete
shear behavior
shear span
slender beams
estimated shear resistance
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/5/1191
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammadtauqir shearbehaviorofgeopolymerconcreteslenderbeams
AT asadullahqazi shearbehaviorofgeopolymerconcreteslenderbeams
AT qasimskhan shearbehaviorofgeopolymerconcreteslenderbeams
AT muhammadjunaidmunir shearbehaviorofgeopolymerconcreteslenderbeams
AT syedminhajsaleemkazmi shearbehaviorofgeopolymerconcreteslenderbeams